Comments by "Titanium Rain" (@ChucksSEADnDEAD) on "" video.

  1. Lmao they were "arguing" for almost a decade? Laughable. The US builds 130-140 F-35s a year.
    5
  2. Poland had a program to use Sparrow missiles in Kub launchers in the 2000s. They probably used that as basis for the Buk/Sea Sparrow conversion.
    4
  3. Massive intakes facing forward would ruin stealth. They'd have use ducting to mask the blades if they were planning on it.
    3
  4. And?
    3
  5. The US invented stealth aircraft
    3
  6. Lmao
    3
  7.  @DIREWOLFx75  "will be put in production by 2025 or maybe 2026" - Just like the thousand Armatas by 2020? "Irrelevant comparison as the Su-57" - It isn't. It doesn't matter which aircraft is comparable to the Su-57, the fact is that the US could get the show on the road and produce more F-35s in one year than Russia can produce in decades. The F-22 program was killed off too early because there were no threats that could match it. And even then, you're admitting that Russia today cannot beat the US production 20 years ago.
    2
  8. ​ @F22Lover  Hypersonic speeds will make objects look like a meteorite in the sky. The opposite of stealth. The heat and noise will broadcast the position.
    2
  9. But the Mosquito's wood construction gave it the same characteristic. When everyone is stealth, nobody is.
    2
  10.  @no-one_no1406  The Ho 229 failed basic stealth with the exposed engine blades at the front.
    2
  11. ​ @olderchin1558  Problem with lasers is the thermal affected area. Material properties are degraded by heat. However there's a machine now that combines a water jet with a laser, and the water jet cools the edges.
    2
  12. It was a microphone probe tied to a balloon. It wasn't a craft of any sort, just a nuke blast sensor.
    2
  13. Marketing wank by Saab.
    2
  14. Spiders Georg is an outlier who must not be counted.
    2
  15.  @DIREWOLFx75  "The Russian Army initially planned to acquire 2,300 T-14s between 2015 and 2020.[11][12][13] By 2018, production and fiscal shortfalls delayed this to 2025,[14] before Russia announced the apparent cancellation of the main production run on 30 July 2018.[15] However, as of 2021, the Russian state-owned TASS media agency claimed the Armata had been expected to begin serial production in 2022, with delivery of a test batch of 100 to the 2nd Guards Tamanskaya Motor Rifle Division expected to begin in 2022.[16]" - The Armata was meant to be in mass production right now.
    1
  16.  @DIREWOLFx75  "you can buy a squadron of SAAB Gripen for the purchase price of each F-22." - And the Gripen isn't meant to win wars. It's meant to "Winter War" the Russians. Basically Sweden loses, but retains independence by using Gripens in a guerrilla war against the Russian air forces. The Gripen is something you get when you know you can't defeat the enemy. That someone was Pierre Sprey, who was a jazz music producer. He hadn't worked with the military for decades. The F-35 has fought with 2,000lb bombs against F-16s with no weapons.
    1
  17.  @DIREWOLFx75  What reality check? The Gripen has failed almost every evaluation it took part it.
    1
  18.  @DIREWOLFx75  You said it wasn't meant to be mass produced, I pulled the evidence to show the Russians claimed it would be, now you're pretending you didn't get BTFO. You got demolished son, try again. How can it proven to be mass produced if they're not mass producing it? Working by hand is what they're doing with Su-57s. The pictures of the facility show that there's no assembly line.
    1
  19. ​ @galvinstanley3235  Jamming cannot predict what a radar will do. Unless time travel becomes real, a jammer will always be behind what the radar is doing.
    1
  20. Their SAMs have been hit by ATACMS and modified S-200 missiles.
    1
  21. I live in the EU. You're wasting your money buying organic. The existence of rules does not mean they are followed.
    1
  22. Pilots have actually said that once they had F-22s on visual, they had trouble getting weapons lock.
    1
  23.  @wind_runner6836  Typically when cutting something and the friction heats up the material or blade, there's coolants splashed on the blade.
    1
  24. The shape is the worst part because of the huge intakes in nthe front.
    1
  25. So Russia goes for power but their engines are weaker than Western ones. They go for maneuverability when maneuverability has been countered by tactics in the Pacific and Vietnam. They go for close in fighting in the age of BVR, and they brag about the R-37M missile... Seems like it's just cope. They don't have a different philosophy. They're just poor.
    1
  26. No. Both sides use the same frequency ranges. Early warning radar can "see" stealth but can't shoot weapons. It's not accurate.
    1
  27. Star Wars ripped off Dambusters and 633 Squadron. It was Lucas who stole the trench run from aviation movies.
    1