Comments by "Titanium Rain" (@ChucksSEADnDEAD) on "Sky News Australia" channel.

  1.  @NeffSang  If people have weak immune systems they should be under lockdown, not the healthy. You're the one who's naive if you think the pharma companies don't like. You hide your opinions behind the credibility of "medical professionals" but it's people in suits selling you the vaccine. Not people in lab coats.
    9
  2. "Let's try these nightmare vision goggles." "Everything looks exactly the same."
    9
  3.  @passivehouseaustralia4406  If you crater a whole country in your physics experiment, the doing good excuse sort of fades away. If you can't keep your research under control you don't get to violate others' rights to keep doing it. You get shut down. At least in a sane world.
    8
  4.  @randomuser4201  233 people cared. Also you, because you cared enough to respond.
    6
  5.  @futurepk1701  "if you catch the virus, and your body combats it on its own, your immune system, during its fight with the invading virus or bacteria, could raise your body temperature, give you a fever, inflame your blood vessels, in an attempt to kill the virus" - This also happens when you take the second shot. That's why they are not giving it to people with known allergies or pregnant women.
    4
  6. Most convictions are probably based on circumstantial evidence. If your finger prints are in a knife and you're seen leaving the location the body was found after the victim's scream, there's no actual direct proof you plunged the knife into the person. We made an inference that you did from the circumstantial evidence.
    4
  7. The lab worked with bats and footage of it was scrubbed off the internet, only available today because people saved it.
    4
  8. To be fair, rather be an anarchist than a pig for the state.
    4
  9.  @Amy-qc2qq  Plenty of people have been off work 11 months.
    3
  10.  @karter969  You let hundreds of people die every year without a care. You just care this time because the TV told you to.
    3
  11.  @letsbehonest4221  "a vaccination needs to be wide spread for it to realy be affective" - This one is between 42-49% "affective", buddy. You can vaccinate every single last human and you still have half the population spreading.
    3
  12.  @toe395  Power also comes with responsibility. We've seen a bunch of power being used with zero responsibility.
    2
  13.  @nomorewar4189  I agree with you, but listing the US's history won't get you any far when the military involved here is Australian. American ships have USS in front of the name, not HMAS.
    2
  14.  @mellowman1020  And the CDC admitted that 94 percent of those numbers were fudged because they ignored all the other causes of death.
    2
  15.  @LondonSteveLee  "assuming stealth works - which it doesn't" - Why are Russian and Chinese arms manufacturers making them, then?
    2
  16.  @herzkine  lol
    2
  17. Because he had his own production company.
    2
  18. Russia can't ultimately win. They're going to be a pariah state, if not actually break apart.
    2
  19.  @LondonSteveLee  The teen series fighters had hundreds scrapped in accidents and dozens of pilots killed. The F-35 only had one loss of life incident so far, a couple crashes and a couple ground fires.
    1
  20.  @LondonSteveLee  Okay. So the old teen series were known for having about 50 crashes and half a dozen pilots killed because we halved the first decade to 5 years. The F-35 still seems to beat them.
    1
  21. That's just 50 more for the meat grinder. 50 people who can operate a defensive missile battery are worth their weight in gold because enemy attacks from the air can wipe out more than 50 infantrymen in a single pass. Those 50 people can prevent the meat grinder. Not to mention that 50 people in the front will not be able to win much of a war if an enemy can simply fly over your factories and power plants unopposed. What point is 50 extra people in the frontline if the enemy can win by simply erasing your entire economy and sending you back to the stone age?
    1
  22.  @simpslayer7839  We've seen Russian-built systems get demolished by Azerbaijan with drones and the Russian-operated defenses in Syria get penetrated by B-1Bs with standoff weapons. Whatever they have, I'm not sold on it.
    1
  23. There's no such thing as depleted uranium bombs. Depleted uranium is used as a penetrator core in armor piercing rounds. Countries either use depleted uranium or tungsten carbide. They're both equally toxic heavy metals. Russia uses tungsten carbine, the UK uses tungsten carbide, I bet that Serbian weapons use tungsten too. The US didn't take Kosovo from Serbia. Serbia was genociding Kosovars and the US stopped it. Years later they declared independence.
    1
  24. It was legal. Serbia was told to stop the genocide. They had a history of taking peacekeepers as hostages. We did what had to be done.
    1
  25. ​ @BarriosGroupie  "AI says" isn't law. Also, you said the bombing was illegal. Now you're arguing certain targets were illegal. That's different. A target can be illegal to hit, but you claimed the intervention was illegal. It wasn't. We cowered and allowed Srebrenica to happen in 1995. It was shameful. In 1999 we weren't cowards.
    1
  26. Putin tore his security to shreds by killing his own armed forces. He has nobody to blame but himself.
    1
  27.  @OtjPlateo  Yes, people should refuse to answer questions that are out of their wheelhouse.
    1
  28. They are losing.
    1
  29. Europe doesn't need Russian energy to exist. Supporting Ukraine means securing our survival. If we give up, we all crumble to nuclear blackmail.
    1
  30. Still quoting Pierre Sprey?
    1
  31. Is the 22% peak efficiency? Because I can see how a fixed panel will not operate at peak efficiency during all hours of daylight.
    1
  32. What he's probably referencing are the intelligence reports. He can't say "we had Agent XYZ in contact with people in the Chinese health department and they thought it came from the lab". Saying too much about the reports could help other nations try to figure out where intelligence leaks are coming from.
    1
  33. No, he banned pro-Russian parties and news outlets. It's a crime to be a traitor.
    1
  34. Nobody is asking for American children. Just weapons. We'll fight and we'll die, we're not asking of the Americans to lose a single life. But we need weapons.
    1
  35. Nah. Mearsheimer is a fool.
    1
  36. They're not holding the Donbas.
    1
  37.  @jensb6522  Ukraine is taking Russian territory and making it theirs.
    1
  38. Putin hired nazis to kill Ukrainians. Look at Wagner, Rusich, etc.
    1
  39. lmao Russia lost all dignity in a war they started
    1
  40.  @godkingemperor9782  Nobody cares. Ukraine can just take the area. Russia can't even take Mykolaiv, how are they going to take Odessa?
    1
  41. Lives will not be lost once the killers are wiped out. Weapons tend to help with that. Kissinger already walked back his claims, by the way.
    1
  42. Russia isn't smiling. Their industry needs Western components. Europe can buy energy. Russia devastated Ukraine. That's what they've done for centuries. They want to do this to Ukrainians, even their literary heroes say it.
    1
  43. He's put the full weight behind the war. They're using S-300 anti-air missiles as ground attack missiles because they can't keep up with the expenditure of cruise and ballistic missiles. They're sending men to the front without armor or helmets.
    1
  44. To be fair, in the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict slow ass drones gave anti-air missiles hell.
    1
  45. The genius killed his own army.
    1
  46.  @TheUtuber999  It's not meant to go to court, it's meant to make the doctor refuse to sign.
    1
  47. No, if you fail an invasion you lose.
    1
  48. How was Georgia demilitarized? They're not neutral - they force Russians that flee to sign a document saying that Russia is at fault. Georgia hates Russia for what they've done, they're not neutral.
    1
  49. There is no shaking hands. Russians have tried to exterminate Ukrainians for centuries. That's not Western propaganda.
    1
  50. Russians are fleeing to the West to avoid Putin's war LMAO
    1
  51. Russia started it by invading in 2014.
    1
  52.  @daviddoran3673  Everything they say is a lie.
    1
  53. "The columns that support the wind mills can be made from stone" - Too heavy. There's a reason skyscrapers aren't made of stone. "These should be designed by governments" - Governments are inherently garbage at producing anything.
    1
  54.  @daguard411  "The devices aren't meant to be portable," - Actually, they are. They have to be shipped to location and assembled. "so weight doesn't matter" - Weight of any construction does matter. Please don't try to argue against basic engineering. "The final line of your comment is only true when it is allowed to happen." - Governments allow themselves to allow it to happen. Since when does the government ask you permission?
    1
  55.  @daguard411  "Well, they don't have to be portable all of the time." - But they have to be portable when being built at factories, transported and assembled, which are critical phases of a final product's lifetime. You can't just think of the finished product, you have to think of every single step. For example the auxiliary solid rockets for the Space Shuttle were supposed to have a larger diameter because that's what the designers figured was the optimal size. But they were made smaller because they had to fit through a tunnel when transported by train. You have to think of the whole picture and how things fit together, not think of the static object. "As for governments asking all of us for permission, I think those are called elections." - Sure. After you give "permission" through voting, is the government going to ask you for input on how to design wind turbines. No, you'll have a few years of them doing whatever they want and then when those years are up your choice will be to let a party you hate win or vote again for the people you gave "permission" to all those years ago. If voting did anything they'd have made it illegal. Stop fooling yourself and thinking you're given importance and power of decision for filling out a ballot.
    1
  56. Ukraine also has orthodox christians fighting the Russians...
    1
  57. The pipeline was stopped. The US had nothing to gain by attacking a pipeline that was not being used.
    1
  58.  @LondonSteveLee  The F-35 is more affordable than 4th gen aircraft. It has a ludicrous combat range on internal tank only. 4 AMRAAMs is plenty. It has performance for days. The F-35 doesn't need satellite communication. It uses a more developed network system than Link16.
    1
  59.  @LondonSteveLee  "you think on day two of open conflict with China or Russia there will be a single GPS or communications satellite left in the sky?" - Aircraft use precise INS. Within range of the DAS+EOTS there's very little drift. So you can tag GPS coordinates using the aircraft and those coordinates are read by the INS without requiring GPS satellites. "Laser-guided iron bombs usually requiring a lump of flesh on the ground or a drone to guide them to target!" - Self-lasing has been a thing for decades. "Something a pair of $100,000 drones can deliver." - Not without getting shot down.
    1
  60.  @LondonSteveLee  "Saudi shot down practically nothing!" - And you expect everyone to be Saudis? "Military air defence systems are designed to deal with conventional aircraft" - Not true. Modern SHORAD is not only set up to target incoming cruise missiles but also glide bombs. "rely completely on satellites" - Not true. Even GPS guided bombs have INS backup. "The west needs to design a simple fast to produce mach 3+ plane" - Why? Going that fast is lighting up a "I'M HERE" sign and burning fuel like there's no tomorrow. "have a thousands of them instead of 100 F-35s" - The F-35 program is 1700 airframes strong, 1500 if they end up cutting back on purchases. Over 625 delivered worldwide. "Active tracking is so last century - your target can see you and it coming from your radar emissions being used to paint the target" - Not true. Low probability of intercept radar makes use of all the background energy that's being blasted across the sky to make emissions difficult to filter. Also, the F-35 can use cues other than radar to obtain lock. "While your emissions are screaming "I'M OVER HERE!!"" - They won't. Not only can the F-35 fire a weapon at a target being painted by some other radar somewhere else, it also has alternate means of detection. And additionally LPI radar is a thing now and RWR is now behind the curve. "A Typhoon or Rafale for instance will automatically immediately mark the radar source" - Not gonna work if the source is an AWACS outside missile range or a bait F-35. Or if the DAS/EOTS is used to obtain the track. "meanwhilte you’re still flying towards him and his missile trying to paint the target for AMRAAM mid-course guidance!" - Not true. Not only are you ignorant of basic procedures like using the full extent of your radar limits to continue a track without flying towards incoming missiles, you also forget that the F-35 can use another aircraft's radar to provide the AMRAAM mid course updates. And failing that, the missile will go pitbull. "You are not going to defeat a modern IR missile fired under 30Kms – it will kill you" - The F-35 also has IR missiles. What the actual hell are you talking about? "Active seeking is pointless/The US should have pursued Pheonix" - The hell? The Phoenix has an active seeker for terminal guidance. "AMRAAM is a joke - you are not going to get a kill with AMRAAM unless you are fighting novice jockeys flying planes from the 90s!" - Novice F-35 pilots wipe the floor with experienced F-15/F-16 pilots in exercises. "I mean, having to guide a missile within the kill zone of the enemy! What year is this again? " - Again, the hell are you talking about?
    1
  61.  @LondonSteveLee  Escaping from missiles doesn't make sense. The SR-71 did it because it flew at extremely high speeds DURING operations. Going from a 0.82 Mach cruise to Mach 3 will take several minutes of acceleration. If you were relying on Mach 3 to escape the missile, the Mach 4 missile already hit you before you got past Mach 1.3. "modern systems can distinguish where radar emissions arrived to each sensor within a few nanoseconds – by triangulating that data it can calculate where it came from" - The problem isn't triangulating where something comes from. It's knowing it's there at all. The skies are constantly being beamed with energy from all directions and because there are limits to receiver antennas and processing power, it's more difficult for a RWR to notice there's an extra signal in the sky than it is for the emitter to hop frequencies in an encrypted pattern. "can shoot down a (not exactly stealthy) AWAC painting it from 200+ KMs away" - Okay. And how do you get within 200 km of an AWACS without a flight of F-35s meeting you? "The reality is F-35 cannot sneak up and deliver an AMRAAM outside the kill-zone of an IR missile without being detected" - It does it on the regular at Red Flag. "unless you fire at point black range most modern aircraft and pilots will escape an AMRAAM" - Not if they're unaware. And we know that in air combat most kills are scored against the unaware. "You’re now in the same airspace as cheaper conventional “proper” fighters" - They're not cheaper. "hinders both production volumes and availability" - With 700 F-35s delivered, there's almost as many F-35s as there are Eurofighters and Rafales combined. "the same reason F-22 is obsolete" - The F-35 is not built to the same standards as the F-22. Over a hundred Block II F-35s have been converted to Block III. The issue with the F-22 was recognized and addressed to make the F-35 more flexible.
    1
  62.  @letsbehonest4221  Okay, call me when they're on the tenth iteration or something. The first nine will probably need the progress.
    1
  63. What do you mean? At this point it's Russia that has to surrender.
    1
  64. "How can burning forests to produce electricity be cleaner than natural gas." - Forests are part of a cycle (as long as you replant) and natural gas is essentially plants that got trapped millions of years ago and didn't fully decompose. When burning a forest you're adding CO2 that gets absorbed by the newer trees, when you burn natural gas you're adding CO2 that didn't exist before to the atmosphere. The thing is, I don't trust the fuel suppliers' promises that the replanting is being done properly. A lot of things can go wrong and we should be planting more, not cutting down.
    1
  65. They are joining the EU and will join NATO when the war is over.
    1
  66. Putin wasn't satisfied. Zelensky walked back the desire to join NATO if it prevented the invasion.
    1
  67. Iron Dome is severely limited, it's designed to counter the massed rocket attacks and not ballistic missiles. Israel uses other missile systems to protect themselves from ballistic missiles which are not Iron Dome.
    1
  68. Is 23% peak efficiency? I could see how a fixed angle panel would have an 8% efficiency through the entire day (daylight).
    1
  69. All totalitarian states can be easily overthrown. They just take steps to make sure they aren't. The people who burned alive were part of a massive street battle (which began when a Russian protester fired an AK at a crowd) where both sides were throwing molotov cocktails. The Russians are in peril? Putin killed them. The Russians in Ukraine are beat into unconsciousness, handcuffed, and sent to the front to be bullet sponges.
    1
  70. Russia is sending 300k to replace 150k troops. That means they most likely suffered 50 thousand KIA and 100 thousand wounded. Russia was killed. Not Ukraine.
    1
  71. All missiles have a Pk, there's no workaround except firing in ripples.
    1
  72.  @KathiWildo  Putin's stooges are castrating capturing Ukrainian soldiers. It's baffling that they would do it, film it, and also release it online, but the only reasonable conclusion is that now that Kherson is cut off, Putin's shock troopers want the Ukrainians mad. And by making Ukrainians mad, the Russians at Kherson will be afraid of getting captured and having them same done to them. Your dear leader, the freedom loving Putin, the European in culture Putin, wants his men to fight to the death at Kherson. And he's telling his minions to commit war crimes in Ukraine to enrage his own enemy.
    1
  73.  @KathiWildo  Stop listening to Russian shills.
    1
  74.  @ARUNMANOJ86  Russia isn't retaliating. They're just bullying others as usual.
    1
  75. Russia isn't recovering. Their industry is grinding to a halt because they need western components.
    1
  76. Ukraine is militarizing. Russia's army is being destroyed. The West is consolidating and we're more united than we were in the past.
    1
  77. It's not a scam at the individual level but it is one at the government level. Also, do your calculations include any subsidies? Would you still get the 30% interest on investment if you had to pay the real market price for panels and installation?
    1
  78. Russia bombed Syria.
    1
  79. The EU isn't splitting, China and India have asked for the war to stop, Turkey is only being self-serving and they sell weapons to Ukrainians too.
    1
  80.  @heliopyre  Look up Modern Monetary Theory. They'll just keep borrowing money from central banks.
    1
  81.  @alexbork4250  There's plenty of black suns in Wagner and Rusich. Ukraine will not pay. Russia is paying. And Putin is to blame.
    1
  82.  @Ben-xe8ps  Yes there have. The Norwegian pharmaceutical authority, whatever it's called in Norwegian, issued a warning regarding the vaccination of the elderly because the reaction to the shot could kill them. Healthcare workers were warned to take the second shot on a Friday if possible because the reaction is severe enough they'd have to miss work. If a healthy person can get knocked out of action for a day, it's obvious that the elderly will have a tougher time resisting.
    1
  83.  @jaredhonusankrom  literally just looking up "wuhan bats" will yield tons of results, you know damned well that posting links gets comments spamfiltered.
    1
  84. Nonsense. The war was won in the early days before Ukraine received American weapons. Russia is Muhammed Ali if he was a terrible fighter. Russia's professional army was destroyed in Ukraine, now they need to send in the amateurs.
    1
  85. But that's fine. I like the idea of solar for energy independence. I don't like the idea of huge solar farms anywhere that isn't a desert.
    1
  86.  @justcurious1157  "I just don't recall anyone bringing all the dead killed in war back to life. Does that mean it is "fine"?" - Right. Russia killed those people. We can't bring Ukrainians back to life. But we can wipe out the killers. Most of them already have been.
    1
  87. And yet Russia begs like a child for sanctions relief.
    1
  88. It was the year before.
    1
  89. They can't reverse engineer the weapons lol who cares? Their industry is toast.
    1
  90. You support a loser ahahah
    1
  91. Russia depends more on gas sales to Europe than Europe depends on purchasing gas from Russia.
    1
  92.  @klokoloko2114  How did nuclear tests reduce the temperature?
    1
  93.  @jimbo8651  how does a person pay 9 million in taxes? Wasn't Biden retired from any political office? And how does someone who was earning 200k-400k a year from politics pay 9 million?
    1
  94.  @jimbo8651  This isn't about net worth, this is about income taxes. Even discarding the lower tax brackets, he'd be paying the highest tax rate on at least 8 million dollars. Where did he earn 16 million dollars in a single year from?
    1
  95.  @jimbo8651  So in a single year Biden got enough from books and speeches to pay 9 mil in taxes? Can we get links to those speeches and titles of books? What businesses does he own? Plus, speeches and book deals are a known form of corruption. You can't buy a politician directly, so you use book deals and speeches to pay them.
    1
  96. Putin didn't have to invade.
    1