Comments by "Titanium Rain" (@ChucksSEADnDEAD) on "Ukraine's river crossing can change the war" video.

  1. Russia depleted Kharkiv out of troops to reinforce Kherson to keep it at all costs. The proverbial more mouths to feed arrived right before Ukraine kicked the dinner table down. No such thing is happening here.
    7
  2. Russia filled Kherson with manpower prior to the bridges being struck. That means that right before Ukraine depleted their resource supply rate, Russia dramatically increased their need for resources in Kherson. It was a one-two punch combo that rocked them. Ukraine is not over filling their bridgehead with troops in a desperate attempt to hold, nor are they hinging on two easily struck crossings. There's no right cross to the jaw. There isn't even a jab that lifts the head and exposes the chin. The double whammy Russia got in Kherson is not here.
    4
  3. They couldn't hold the bridgehead because they depleted the Kharkiv front to fill Kherson with manpower. They increased their resource consumption rate, and Ukraine struck their resource supply rate. If Ukraine has a force properly sized to match the supply, they cannot be driven out the same way.
    3
  4. Trump only has cultists by his side now, and Trump would make it seem like giving Ukraine aid was his idea to begin with.
    1
  5. Does that mean Russia will be winning soon?
    1
  6.  @blackcatdungeonmastersfami5311  How is it a cope? If the Kherson bridgehead is so easy to clear, why hasn't Russia done it?
    1