Comments by "Titanium Rain" (@ChucksSEADnDEAD) on "Why haven't we seen WW2-style mass tank offensives in Ukraine?" video.

  1. Last time I checked, if you send 100% military age men to war you'll have no men in the workforce.
    2
  2. ​ @TheRealBillBob  But Russians complain that because of Ukrainian drone videos, they're using drones for grenade drops instead of recon. They fell for the psyops.
    1
  3.  @TheRealBillBob  What translator?
    1
  4. Yet Kharkiv was retaken with a tank thrust.
    1
  5. ​ @phil4818  Do not change the subject. Immigration is not related to the war.
    1
  6. ​ @Ghastly_Grinner  the Ghost of Kiev was made up by the internet. The Ukrainian air force said he wasn't real but represented the spirit of the pilots
    1
  7. ​ @Ghastly_Grinner  Russia started with 200k and 50k DPR/LPR. Then Russia used regular troops to make up for losses. Then Russia mobilized 300k. It's estimated Russia has used 500 to 700 thousand troops.
    1
  8. ​​ @myronplatte8354  If they're not in a hurry to take territory, why are they doing frontal assaults on Bakhmut? They tried to encircle the city and Ukraine reinforced the flanks to stop the capture of the city. So they were forced to do what they didn't want to do, attack the city itself. That means they want territory at all costs.
    1
  9. ​@Marie Tsuki Equipment "reserves" has two meanings. There's stuff in storage WE DON'T USE AT ALL and need to be dismantled. There's the reserves of ammunition which exist to have enough for training and emergencies. We didn't empty the equipment reserves, and the ammo reserves will be replenished by increased production.
    1
  10. @Marie Tsuki Did you read my comment?
    1
  11. So they switched to attrition, but then attrited their own forces with frontal assaults...?
    1
  12. ​ @JeRefuseDeBienPrononcerBaleine  Western sources focus on Russia proper, Ukraine counts Russians and separatists.
    1