Comments by "Titanium Rain" (@ChucksSEADnDEAD) on "Russia has produced more combat jets than it lost in Ukraine in 2023" video.

  1. No, they didn't. They told you that in close up trench fighting in Bakhmut, shovels were used. Your either pretend to not understand, or you actually lack the capacity to do so.
    7
  2. ​ @TheZachary86  the US produces over a hundred F-35s per year. Russia's capacity is indeed laughable.
    6
  3. Russia is getting aid from Iran and North Korea.
    5
  4. But they're not. A lot of the manufacturing in Russia during WWII was American, a lot of resources were American, and a lot of finished products were American or British in origin. Then during the Cold War the production was spread around the USSR and Warsaw Pact, for example many Soviet ships were built by Ukraine and Poland. In terms of aviation their "mass production" can't match America, look up how many F-35s are built per year.
    4
  5. ​ @Antiteshmis  Russia is using T-54s while the US has a desert full of Abrams sitting around.
    3
  6. ​ @AspieTrips  He's wrong because Russia is getting military aid from North Korea and Iran. That's like having to cheat at school by copying the special ed kids. Russia was taken seriously before 2022.
    2
  7. ​ @Antiteshmis  Russia's GDP growth is entirely measured by Rosstat, the Russian state's own statistics department. There is no independent confirmation of their numbers.
    2
  8. ​ @theeternalsuperstar3773  Novorossiya doesn't exist. They conscripted the men and used them as cannon fodder. Recently deceased Murz said as such.
    1
  9. How many losses in a week?
    1
  10.  @aniksamiurrahman6365  What happened to the A-50, Sergei?
    1
  11. Here comes the Storm Z reject squad.
    1
  12. ​ @Slavic_Goblin  Glide bombs were dropped outside Ukraine for over a year. I'm sure Kiyv Post reported on it then. Saying it is happening "now" is propaganda as it intends to convey improvement. There isn't. Belgorod was bombed multiple times because the shoddy guidance kits fell off and the live bomb just dropped into cities.
    1
  13.  @ViolentCabbage-ym7ko  Russia hasn't crumbled because of Iran and North Korea.
    1
  14.  @andrewscott8892  They're giving away their reserves, always a good sign.
    1
  15. ​ @nunya___  The reserves sit on a decaying area. It's like the Anerican rust belt but actually war torn.
    1
  16. Why? Only naval forces and training squadrons fly MiGs. They retired the majority of MiG-29s because it's less powerful and has less range than the Flanker.
    1
  17.  @milsimmaniac711  That makes no sense. The MiG-35 program was scrapped precisely because they had no foreign buyers and thus couldn't afford it. The MiG-29 production could be restored but the MiG-35 production would have to be built from scratch.
    1
  18. ​ @AspieTrips  Protecting Bosnians from Serb genocidal maniacs.
    1
  19. ​ @aniksamiurrahman6365  Nice cope. The Russian offensive was stalled before Starlink or lethal aid.
    1
  20. They did run out, which is why they switched to Shaheds and S-300s to produce more. There's a manufacturing rate and an expenditure rate, whenever your expenditure rate is greater than the manufacturing you are running out. Using alternative forms of attack gains you time to produce more by making the expenditure rate go to 0.
    1