Comments by "Titanium Rain" (@ChucksSEADnDEAD) on "America's Insane Plan for Nuclear Powered Planes" video.

  1. ITT: flagrant targeting of innocent civilians is excused by people who dismiss war crimes due to "context".
    5
  2.  @dragonsystems5973  yes, the blatant targeting of civilians was unecessary. Especially in Europe, since the Reich fought to the bitter end, making all the civilian deaths useless.
    2
  3. Vehicles in direct contact with and ocean's supply of water can deal with meltdowns much better than air-cooled ones. Also a ships can malfunction in the middle of the ocean and still be rescued. An airplane that dies mid-air will splatter the nuclear reactor into the ground.
    1
  4.  @happydemon3038  that's why i said "malfunction" and not "lose power" because losing power is one thing and losing authority over the plane is another. "landing in bodies of water" - can still lead to the plane breaking apart, and planes often fly over land "with a ruptured hull." - a sunk ship would have a dead man switch that triggered a core shutdown, or the crew's last actions before drowning could be ensuring the core will not enter a meltdown in case of the damage prevents cooling. An airplane falling out of the sky will drive the core into the ground and break through the shielding.
    1
  5. Not the enemy. Innocent civilians.
    1
  6.  @Flashblade  that's a fucking lie. It was a deliberate choice that made no actual difference in the outcome in the war.
    1
  7.  @DavidVercettiMovies  so planes lever land or crash?
    1