Comments by "Titanium Rain" (@ChucksSEADnDEAD) on "Brandon Herrera"
channel.
-
287
-
285
-
194
-
59
-
42
-
34
-
31
-
22
-
18
-
16
-
15
-
15
-
14
-
13
-
13
-
@theosvult4857 the problem is, we have a system that basically looks if you've ever been committed to a mental hospital or if a psychologist flagged you as a dangerous person. If you make people take a test before getting the gun... then they can ban guns without actually banning guns. Just make the "sanity check" almost impossible to pass. My girlfriend tried to join my country's equivalent of the FBI and she failed selection in the psychological evaluation. The problem? The standards are so strict that they considered that she was "not trusting enough". You'd think they want investigators who don't believe suspects testimonies and verify the facts, right? Either way, imagine they just put those standards on the sanity check. Oh, you don't trust the government? You're crazy, no gun. Oh, you trust the government too much? That's crazy, no gun. Do you trust random people? No? That's crazy, you're paranoid. Oh, you trust them? That's naive, you're crazy.
12
-
12
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@devildog1989 The prices drop with mass manufacture.
The 6.8 SPCII has existed for 20 years, and it sucked for all of them. If you're hunting with hollowpoints it's actually great, but as a military caliber it was evaluated by SOCOM and dropped.
There's no such thing as bolt and barrel swaps. Unfortunately I don't remember when, must have been in a Q&A, but Ian McCollum has delivered one of the best explanations about how conversions can have almost everything go wrong. You won't save billions. First of all, it's a worse cartridge than 5.56. Second, it's going to go wrong. Even the M21 program was a failure. The Mk14 EBR was another shitshow. This obsession with "saving money" by trying to polish turds has not saved any money at all.
Gold Dot is by Speer. Either way, the 77gr SMK on Mk262 has a G7 = .185 if you want to chase BCs, you won't beat that with a 90gr 6.8. The issue with the BC argument is that high BC bullets for 6.8 are naturally heavier or too long to fit the AR magazine format. Heavy bullets is going 7.62x39 after trying 5.45 - experience tells us it's a mistake and a step backwards. You gain BC, but you lose in velocity which means it's still arcing more than 5.56. You could do a light for caliber load, but that's to increase short range performance without gaining 400+ yard performance. Okay, M855A1 already did that. 6.8 SPC is completely irrelevant in terms of a military load, which is why official adoption only came from the DEA and gate guards in Middle Eastern oil states. If you want to shoot a guy driving a VBIED before he can get close to an oil sheik, a 6.8 hollow point does the trick.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
"If you were to modyfi a pistol with a longer barel and a bipod and a stock. It would become more "effektive" at longer ranges, while "still" beeing a pistol" - Okay, but pistols are more regulated than rifles. Why not start from a rifle?
"Explain to me how switzerland can have higher gun desity than the US" - It actually doesn't. Switzerland has 45.7 guns per 100 people, the US has over 100 guns per 100 people. The number is not actually known.
"Where im from (norway), you need a legitimate reason to own a gun, be it for competition or hunting. And you need proof that you are using the gun for what it is registerd for, or else your gun permit is invalid" - Okay. In the US you don't need a reason. It's a right. This is not negotiable with with all due respect, we don't care how it's done in other countries.
"If you are using it for just shooting, having the ammo only at the range would not be a problem." - So why keep it at home, then? Without ammo it's a paper weight, just display.
"And are more or less the reason why people think they need a gun for protection, since that sketchy neighbour has a gun for no "legitimate" reason." - Not true at all. Most people trust their neighbors. Also, the gun isn't to protect against guns. It's to protect against taller and heavier people who can kill me with their bare hands. Knives. Bats. Tire irons. I have the right to have an unfair advantage over an attacker who wants to harm me.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1