Comments by "Titanium Rain" (@ChucksSEADnDEAD) on "" video.

  1.  @marealnamenott  that would be measurements that seem irrational in metric but are clear once converted to inch.
    13
  2. Already exists: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Po7sX-rKuQs
    2
  3.  @RevRaptor898  How do you make the bending dies or the hydraulic press out of those tools?
    2
  4.  @TheRockyRacoon92  "if they decide to regulate all main parts (barrel, bolt ...) and not only the receiver ( like they do in europe), it's really hard to produce anything shooting high pressure ammo." - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Po7sX-rKuQs this was designed SPECIFICALLY for Europe and it takes ZERO gun parts.
    2
  5. You only need something as strong is you need to maintain measurements. If you can make the parts thicker, strain is force divided by area. Increase the area and you can apply the same force on a material with lower strain limits. And yes, there's a composite improvement to the plastikov which involves fiberglassing certain areas.
    2
  6. The trunnion isn't "impacted" per se, it's being pushed to the rear. If your trunnion is getting impacted you have fucked up headspacing issues.
    1
  7.  @knottheory79220  The issue is that it's not strictly necessary to 3d print metal. In the FGC-9 the barrel is made from Chinese hydraulic pipe rifled using a 3d printed mandrel and electric current. The trunnion is three shaft collars. The bolt is two pieces of steel tubing with a crude weld joining them, epoxied to a 3d printed bolt "carrier" and a weld blob added to the bottom to create the cartridge pick up. It's caveman simple, if alibaba or metal suppliers carry the tubes and bar stock there's no need to print them.
    1
  8. You don't need to print metal as long as steel tubes and bar stock is on sale on literally any supplier.
    1
  9. The DetDisp designs are meant to be printed on PLA.
    1
  10. I hope this is satire. It's not a "better" or "worse" problem, it's that you can't just mix both when they were designed for one standard. Also, the inch is defined by the metric system. Imperial is just metric with a conversion applied to it.
    1
  11. "Guys in caves with no shoes build these" - No, they don't. If you look at the Izhmash factory tour by Larry you'll see a room with probably 1-2 million dollars in forging equipment.
    1
  12.  @MadMetalShop  You didn't hand build them. The trunnions and bolts were forged in expensive machines paid for by the Soviet state. Yeah, the Khyber Pass guns are notorious for requiring hand-loaded ammunition that is purposefully weak. Look at the ammo they're manufacturing, it looks like they're loading the cartridges with weed. That's how nasty the powder they're using is. If you fire a real factory round in one of those babies it's game over.
    1
  13.  @MadMetalShop  It's not a strawman. You said they're built in caves. Sure, you can bend a flat in a cave. Actually make the damned thing? No. "The ak is an extremely simple weapon to make" - I have the blueprints on my computer. It's not simple at all. How do you make the 3mm helical pitch in the trunnion locking lugs in a cave? (visual example of the feature I'm talking about: https://www.akfiles.com/forums/showthread.php?t=237810) "Do you know why you don't have to actually make the parts? Because the world market is literally flooded with them." - It used to be. Parts kits were dirt cheap compared to now. But the issue still stands, you can't claim the AK is a simple weapon when you rely on factory parts. The receiver is simple. Big whoop. One would hope it would be, to limit the complex operations to the trunnion. "How much you be willing to pay for this receiver after all the R and D?" - The point isn't paying for a finished product. It's proving that it can be done. And it has been done: https://youtu.be/0_gjwGNkVX8?t=27 Brandon just so happened to find issues because he was talking to someone he thought was Ivan who gave him a 4 month old file that didn't have the final revisions, inch rails instead of metric and from what I've gathered his print seemed to have underextrusion issues. Do it right and it works. Do it wrong and it craps out on you.
    1
  14. How would it be intentional?
    1
  15. Kalashnikovs are not KISS. In fact it took years for the Russians to get stamped receivers right. Also, be it technical drawings, CAD models or CNC tool paths nearly everything comes from a "damn computer".
    1
  16. If your designs are that good make them yourself and beat the competition.
    1
  17. It's actually weaker.
    1
  18. Nah, Ivan simply doesn't tolerate mouthbreathing retards. In fact he accepted an improvement on the FCG-9 ejector which is going to be present on the next release with the HK-style charging handle I believe.
    1
  19. All guns are untraceable until they're sitting in evidence lockers.
    1
  20.  @9996741699  Your disagreement doesn't mean shit. Creating a firearm doesn't require a 4473.
    1
  21. It isn't.
    1
  22. It's going to get significantly more expensive once you abandon the plastic realm.
    1
  23. "Stay away from 3d printed guns" - No. "You might as well lern how to stamp sheet metal parts" - You're not staping parts at home. Bending flats? Sure. Stamping? You ain't getting that type of press inside a home. "By this time, you should have enough money to buy yourself a lathe, a mill" - How do you get those on the 6th floor of an Asian/European apartment building?
    1
  24. Making guns is legal.
    1
  25. Registries don't mean shit. If he had taken a registered weapon, the only point at which it would matter would be when he's already in custody and the weapon introduced into the evidence locker. A number and a name in a computer doesn't do anything.
    1
  26. nope: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Po7sX-rKuQs
    1
  27. Mixing stuff into the polymer can actually weaken it in some aspects.
    1
  28.  @paulrobbins4879  It works in a way that isn't suitable for the home gamer. The metal 3d printers especially use powdered metal, which due to the heat involved needs to be kept in an inert atmosphere or else it can catch fire.
    1
  29. Nah it's these: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Po7sX-rKuQs https://gunstreamer.com/watch/freeman-039-s-glock-3d-printed-g17-frame-release-trailer_ZO6FRcDzlImML6q.html
    1
  30. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Po7sX-rKuQs
    1
  31.  @WojciechP915  Still needs trunnions, barrels and bolts which are not legal in Europe because the receiver isn't conmsidered the gun, the pressure bearing parts are.
    1
  32. Almost everyone except the former Eastern Bloc uses feet for altitude in aviation and nautical miles for navigation.
    1
  33. It's not cheap at all. It's only "cheap" because millions of government rifles were pulled out of storage in the Eastern Bloc or manufactured on decades old plants already paid by the state.
    1
  34. Running those machines costs money. I'm not sure General Dynamics or Lockheed Martin are gonna just let people drop by and print stuff on their million dollar machine.
    1
  35. What do you mean 2-3 years? https://youtu.be/0_gjwGNkVX8?t=37
    1
  36. No.
    1
  37. In Europe the receiver isn't regulated, the bolt and barrel are.
    1
  38. The cast AKs use castings on the locking lugs, bolt lugs, etc. This uses real AMD-65 forged parts which are safe.
    1
  39. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Po7sX-rKuQs
    1
  40. We have a video by ivan where it works fine, and a video by Brandon in which he admits he built it incorrectly where it doesn't work. Hmmmmm.
    1
  41. Do you have the money to rent those babies from major corporations like GE or Lockheed Martin?
    1
  42. Ender 3 is like 180 bucks on sale. Stop being poor. Buy more money.
    1