Comments by "Titanium Rain" (@ChucksSEADnDEAD) on "Ukraine's Offensive Coincides with US $3 Billion+ Aid Package - Russian Ops in Ukraine Sep. 9, 2022" video.

  1. 70km is far too deep for elastic defense. There were almost no losses to the attackers, they took a ton of POWs and captured artillery, ammo and APCs.
    6
  2. Meanwhile Russia reports the capture of Pisky 8 times.
    5
  3. Foolish tactic, because they allowed Ukrainians to cut off Izyum. They also dropped the weapons and ammo on the way out, so it would be difficult to do any killing.
    5
  4. No, they've essentially cut off Izyum.
    4
  5. Because they'd be blown out of the sky by S-300s.
    3
  6. Actually they cut off Izyum. Bye bye.
    3
  7. Your anxiety will return as soon as you realize it wasn't misinformation. Russia is losing.
    3
  8. If they continue in this trajectory, they'll have Crimea back by mid 2023. They're slashing through the Izyum axis.
    3
  9. They didn't. They abandoned the weapons, APCs and ammo. They didn't have the means to surround or destroy anything. They fled.
    3
  10. Russia can't even with the war.
    3
  11. @Dawn Razor It speaks volumes about Russia's inability to manufacture drones.
    2
  12. The big picture is that frontline collapses will keep happening.
    2
  13.  Zoomer Stasi  Amazing how operators who can't use weapons stalled out Russia's advance with 4 HIMARS and 2 M270s.
    2
  14. Nah, Strelkov predicted Russia's failure and people mocked him for saying the truth. Now everyone knows he was right.
    2
  15.  @HenningYT  They tried the north and got their ass kicked
    2
  16. There's no buffer zone with Finland in NATO.
    2
  17.  @Bayethe  Billions spent on homelessness every year - no result.
    2
  18.  @VladK-1  It's not a cauldron because the Ukrainians are capturing tons of APCs, artillery and ammo left behind in a hurry. They can't spring a trap without weapons. Also, the advance covered almost 70km in 3-4 days and is threatening to cut off Izyum. You don't let your enemy slash your supply lines in a silly trap.
    2
  19. Izyum was encircled.
    2
  20. The bear was overhype all along.
    2
  21. Can't refine tactics if Russia and its simps refuse to admit their loss.
    2
  22. Major cope.
    2
  23.  @user-yh7fc7wt6v  lel cope harder z boy The biolabs will never go away
    2
  24. If it works, it works.
    2
  25. "they need to take out the Kiev Govt buildings, their command control and decision centers" - This was done the night of the start of the war. Their weapons are just garbage and miss or fail to detonate, or they hit but the command and control/people were in secure locations as they were tipped off of the attack. Russia already tried the C&C and decision centers. They failed. They have nothing else.
    2
  26. They still got plenty of steam bub.
    1
  27. The Third Army Corps? They're a poorly trained understrength division, which is now being sent to plug gaps instead of offensive operations as they can't do concentration of forces. Seems like there's no plan. Oh well!
    1
  28. @Dawn Razor Why? Make it make sense. If it was a friendly gesture, they'd have bought the drones before. If they need them mid-war, it's because they don't have enough.
    1
  29.  @anceldesingano8687  It is special. Russia has a ton of drones. But they use commercial ones which have been hacked, military ones which can be jammed into crashing into the ground, and had to pull drones from their civil protection agency. Drones meant to serve as forest surveillance against fires are used in battle. Now that they have failed and lost a ton of drones, they're asking Iran for some. Which is good news for the Ukrainians, if you watch the Iranian drone demos they put explosives in the targets and detonate them to pretend they hit when they actually missed.
    1
  30.  @Dangling-Pointer  The Soviets couldn't handle the goat herders.
    1
  31. "test out a handfull of newer weapons" - We know the Javelin works (90s), we know Stingers work (Russia's foe from Afghanistan), we know StarStreak works (1980s). The HARMs we sent have a manufacturing date of 1991, which is just precious. We're sending 30-40 year old weapons we've already used in combat. The MLRS systems we sent are based on 1980s tech, with a 2005 guidance system. We've used HIMARS against Wagner mercenaries in Syria back in 2018. We slaughtered them and posted the video online if you want to watch. We don't need the tests, we've already ran the tests decades ago and we've drawn real blood in real battle. We don't need Ukraine to test anything. We're sending the weapons so that they can fulfill their original purpose.
    1
  32.  @vladimirvojtaml  But he's still right.
    1
  33.  @jaypeters5224  And yet they can't use it to win against Ukraine, but Ukraine receiving GPS guided HIMARS stalled the Russian offensive. Funny, Russia has all that equipment and can't do anything other than slowly inching forward, Ukraine is repeatedly hitting ammo depots and HQs.
    1
  34.  @No-timeforimbeciles  The inept Ukrainians are just punching Russia's teeth in. If they're inept, how bad are the Russians at this?
    1
  35.  @A.B.5KRVw  A) the fact that there's almost no fighting and settlements are captured within hours. Everyone is smiling in pictures and the videos show Ukrainians being welcomed by the elderly who are surprised to see Ukrainian forces so soon. If there were battles, people would be hiding. B) I've seen 6 in a single video. And I've seen a lot of videos. There's even one where they feed hot sauce to a Russian POW. C) Drowned APCs? The Ukrainians are driving the ones on the roads. I'm getting the information from everywhere. You only get it from Russian approved sources.
    1
  36. The US spends trillions on US citizens. What's a few billion between friends?
    1
  37. Not if the rail line is under fire control of the Ukrainian Armed Forces. Anything coming in gets struck by 155mm.
    1
  38. The panic is warranted.
    1
  39.  @johnmakinta2591  Last Winter bit Russia pretty bad.
    1
  40.  @briancarno8837  The videos and photos show that the Russians are leaving the artillery behind. Plus the LDPR and Rosgvardia troops are poorly trained with heavy weapons.
    1
  41.  @chrismiles6010  Air lifting is an incredibly poor way to reinforce anything. There's no long convoy, that's just a staged propaganda shoot.
    1
  42. Taiwan isn't a part of China. It's the remnant of China. They are the Republic of China, which had to flee due to Mao's rise to power. They are a country in exile from their homeland in an island across the strait. The PRC took over their land. Ukraine wasn't part of Soviet Russia. They were part of the Soviet UNION. It as the Ukraine SSR. They were a separate republic from Russia.
    1
  43. No, Russia is fighting just Ukraine.
    1
  44. Okay, look at the Russian information - they're claiming the armed forces left Izyum due to threat of encirclement.
    1
  45. 20 hours later... they weren't in favorable positions. The Ukrainian forces weren't destroyed. Artillery wasn't working.
    1
  46. Except that Russia allowed Ukraine to go so far, supply lines were cut. Letting someone inside your house and then offering them your neck to let them strangle you is not a sound tactical choice.
    1
  47. Good. Let them dishearten you. The Russians are not on top of the situation. The daily reports should be troubling. The Russians are collapsing. The tide is turning.
    1
  48. No trap. Russians got slaughtered. Seems like God has chosen Ukraine.
    1
  49. lel meanwhile Russia is forcing the DPR and LPR men to die for their pointless war of expansionist gains.
    1
  50.  @sixmillionsilencedaccounts3517  Those people now know that Russia is the real enemy, for Russia killed them.
    1
  51. Time to forget what you've learned, Diane. Russia is getting defeated.
    1
  52. The panic attacks will return. Your army is dying and fleeing. Time to wake up and smell the coffee, Olga.
    1
  53.  @Vladviking  NATO didn't invade Iraq or Syria. Libya was a no fly zone requested by the Arab League and sanctioned by the UN.
    1
  54.  @Vladviking  It's not a NATO operation just because there's nations involved in it. Is the Ukrainian war a CSTO operation?
    1
  55.  @Vladviking  The UN has China and Russia in the security council.
    1
  56. They should. Russian leadership is in denial. Maybe they shouldn't. You're right. Glad the Russian leadership keeps lying to itself and refuses to hear the pleas of those getting crushed in the field.
    1
  57. lmao there's no cauldron, Russian milbloggers are reporting that Russia left Izyum.
    1
  58.  @joeya6795  Don't know a thing about projection my guy, but Russia is getting curb stomped. This is a failure that may actually break up the Russian Federation.
    1
  59. How many rubles is it costing per Russian death?
    1
  60. They are very pessimistic because they are realizing they're losing. Your faith means nothing. Patience means nothing. The more you cling, the more the inevitability of Russia's loss will hurt you. Give up.
    1
  61.  @vaska1999  But they would. Russia bombarded Kiev from day one. What a bad excuse.
    1