Comments by "Titanium Rain" (@ChucksSEADnDEAD) on "Ukraine's Offensives vs. Russian Mobilization" video.

  1.  @wilhallman2890  Lie lol. Russia was offering MASSIVE salaries for volunteers. Only a few thousand took them. Now they declared mandatory service and reduced pay. Why would people volunteer for LESS money?
    3
  2. 20:1 kill ratio and Ukraine still advancing lol
    3
  3.  @Conserpov  They're already being captured and dying in Ukraine. Some check up.
    2
  4.  @meddy833  But the Russian army was destroyed.
    2
  5. In October 6th Ukraine will still be winning. What would be the next cope?
    2
  6. They're losing the regions.
    2
  7. Okay, but Ukraine got the chainsaw and started cutting off Mike Tyson's arms and legs.
    2
  8.  @klwthe3rd  He's not right. Stop waiting. Russia isn't bouncing back.
    2
  9.  @roseeann2184  You love Russia but your love will die. You can still change sides. We won't forget those who backed our enemies.
    2
  10. "Peace loving" lol then encourages genocide You're a legit psychopath
    1
  11.  @wilhallman2890  What does Robert Barnes know?
    1
  12. They're mobilized. They're civilians drafted into the war, not professional.
    1
  13. There is no panic lol They were mostly mobilized lol Artillery and aviation is working lol >>>YOU ARE HERE<<< We abandoned another position lol
    1
  14.  @junaidmuhammed5740  The weather punished Russia in February.
    1
  15.  @Conserpov  They are not irrelevant. Severodonetsk has no rail coming from the East because it ends around Donetsk.
    1
  16.  @joethekinghawk7514  But Ukrainians are shooting down aircraft, and using artillery to destroy Russian artillery.
    1
  17. Because Ukraine shoots down aircraft.
    1
  18. But they aren't. Stop listening to Russian cope. They're encircling settlements instead of direct assaults. Choke the Russians out, they'll leave.
    1
  19.  @joethekinghawk7514  "one day or else...!" And Ukraine still advances
    1
  20. NATO said Ukraine would win the war before they could finish the paperwork. But keep coping.
    1
  21. There's hundreds of HIMARS in service. If the US thinks Ukraine needs more, they'll just send some from existing stock and wait for them to be produced to have a replacement.
    1
  22. Ironic that Ukraine is using hundreds of Russian tanks to kill Russians.
    1
  23.  @popebiscuit3443  Why slow down? Whenever they advance the Russians retreat into roads that are under Ukrainian fire control. Cause massive casualties. Wait until the Russians reach a new defensive position. Encircle it. Russians retreat. Dish out the punishment. Let them fix on the next position. Encircle them. Let them retreat. Fire for effect.
    1
  24.  @sigmasix3719  Winter punished Russia in Ukraine. Remember all the columns of destroyed Russian vehicles?
    1
  25.  @imoneixusa9742  They don't have 800,000. Sorry, it's all for show.
    1
  26.  @christophmahler  The "allied" losses were massive. Ukrainians happy and simging, filming the Highways of Death. Come back to reality.
    1
  27. What will the pro Russian people say when they watch the widely available videos of Ukrainians celebrating next to Russisn corpses? The Russians look like bums, the Ukrainians happy.
    1
  28. Bakhmut is useless if Ukraine is just going to hook around Severodonetsk lmao
    1
  29. The Russian withdrawls are a massacre. Footage from the roads heading out of the cities they abandon are full of corpses and limbs.
    1
  30. S-300s would easily shoot them down.
    1
  31. The road out of Lyman is littered with Russian corpses. The victory isn't political - Ukraine lets Russians retreat and then slaughters them as they flee.
    1
  32.  @peteredimo9420  in his mind
    1
  33.  @andreafalconiero9089  Ukraine captured the T-80s from the 1st Guards Tank Army. The Ukrainian 93rd Mechanized fought the premier tank unit Russia had and beat them so hard in Kharkiv they abandoned tanks. Now the 93rd uses Russian tanks to hunt the Russian soldiers. Ukraine also received updated T-72s from Poland and the T-55s are no longer T-55s. They have upgrades that bring them to 1990s standard - 105mm NATO gun, ERA, laser sensors and automatic smoke deployment, more powerful engine.
    1
  34.  @johnbest6987  Cope lol they're Ukrainians.
    1
  35. Traidor lol vai viver para as terras do Putin.
    1
  36.  @Conserpov  we understand the Russian military has lied about everything so far
    1
  37. Sure. Russia leaves all Ukrainian territory as defined in 1991, they surrender war criminals, return the 2.5 million Ukrainian refugees, and pay for the reparations. Then peace will be achieved.
    1
  38. Peskov said he doesn't know.
    1
  39.  @Olegstuff21986  The mobilized will be slaughtered
    1
  40. Scrap metal and cannon fodder.
    1
  41. The mobilized are cannon fodder.
    1
  42. Russia obliges because they have no choice. Russia has been defeated, they're just in denial.
    1
  43. Heavy bombers are easily shot down by S-300 or Buk.
    1
  44. Ukraine purposefully targets troops away from the front lines. You won't fight directly? The missiles and artillery still rain on you. Take out one logistics trooper, you starve out 10 frontline soldiers.
    1
  45.  @kishanchali8752  Huh, think a little. They use shoulder fired missiles because Russians fly low. Why do Russians fly low? Because of Ukrainian AD. If Ukraine only had shoulder fire weapons, they'd be unable to target high flying aircraft. Russia canno fly high. Ukraine has S-300s. The Kharkiv offensive also showed mobile Buk launchers following the advance to bring down aircraft that tried to defend Balakliia or Izyum.
    1
  46.  @kishanchali8752  If Ukraine doesn't have functional AD systems, why are Russian aircraft avoiding Ukrainian airspace? Shouder-fired missiles are only effective when the enemy has to fly under AD. When the Soviets gave Vietnam S-75s, the US started suffering more shootdowns from anti-air artillery. By your logic, if Vietnam had functional AD, they wouldn't need AAA. Turns out that AD forces the enemy to react by flying lower. Alternatively - if Ukraine had no AD, why is Russia suffering losses from shoulder launched missiles? They could just fly above MANPADS range.
    1
  47.  @kishanchali8752  How does that have anything to do with what I said? I asked why aren't fixed wing assets flying above MANPADS range like the US did in Desert Storm after the AD network was taken down.
    1
  48.  @kishanchali8752  In Mariupol, which was surrounded by Russian territory with no Ukrainian defenses. Why aren't Tu-95s flying over Kiev and Lviv? Why aren't paratroopers being dropped in Odessa?
    1
  49.  @kleanthisxanthopoulos4697  Ukraine is more militarized than ever.
    1
  50. Can't wait to see F-16s score air to air kills.
    1
  51. They already tried. East Ukraine has no water due to Russian attacks.
    1
  52. And yet Peskov says he doesn't know where the borders are. Aka "If we draw a line Ukraine will cross it and capture our land, so we can't say anything"
    1
  53. One of the hypersonic missiles crashed in Russian territory. Their stuff sucks.
    1
  54. Please, I want to see S-300s smacking those bombers. I want to see the crash sites full of charred crewmen.
    1
  55. The Poles are buying Abrams to replace them.
    1
  56. kek meanwhile Ukraine recovers in a week more land than Russia can take in three months
    1
  57.  @Migsie73  It's lasting long. Russia plays the long game of suffering economically, wasting its demographics on a pointless conflict, and not having manpower.
    1
  58. NATO has not sent a single naval vessel, aircraft or Western tank. How are we depleting everything? We still have JDAMs, Tomahawks, F-16s, Typhoons, Mirages, Abrams, Leopard 2, etc.
    1
  59. What do you mean? The roads are littered with Russian corpses.
    1