Comments by "Titanium Rain" (@ChucksSEADnDEAD) on "The Dark side of Science: The horror of the Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment (Short Documentary)" video.

@scottydu81 And John Money.
21
@nahoj.2569 Don't ask questions, just wait for next variant and get excited for next booster. Why would Pfizer unblind the trials after 6 months? Why would they lie about the number of excess deaths they had versus the control group? Why would Moderna claim they made their shot in 48 hours when we know they sent samples for shot candidates to the University of North Carolina in the 12th of December 2019? Why was the person who received those candidates Ralph Baric, a researched who coauthored papers with Shi Zenghli from the Wuhan institute of virology? Why was Peter Daszak, who diverted the NIH funds through EcoHealth Alliance to the Wuhan institute, allowed to be part of the team that investigated the origin and said lab leak was impossible? Why did Peter Daszak email Ralph Baric to ask him to not sign the open letter in the Lancet journal so reduce suspicion? I know what you're going to do. You're going to say it's all "fake news". You won't even dare to look into it, because you'll be scared it's true.
4
@QT5656 Undermine the scientists that diverted funds to participate in illegal research, and spent the last two years covering each others' asses? Good. Also, it's you people who always mention Darwin. Just saying, but you guys are the eugenicists.
3
@QT5656 Presenting the argument that all walks of life that are noticing the incongruencies are "far right" is beyond bad faith. It's clear manufacture of consent. First, Charles Darwin was sympathetic to eugenics. In The Descent of Man he argues that only the ignorant allow the worst of their species to breed. Second, you're clearly twisting words. An appeal to Darwin is eugenicist even if Darwin was not. Saying that the intelligent will survive and it's a good thing that the unintelligent will die is in itself eugenicist. Either way, these people appealing to Darwin don't even understand Darwinism so they can't figure out that people in the 60-90 age range dying off does absolutely nothing to stop them from breeding. They already have. The children and young adults will survive.
2
@brucebaxter6923 It's easy to hide when you erase the control group.
2
"I am grateful for the transparency of the modern medical community." - Just wait a few decades until they finally admit what they've been doing now.
2
Considering how a certain doctor was promoting the failed cancer drug AZT back then, I can't blame them.
1