Comments by "Titanium Rain" (@ChucksSEADnDEAD) on "Carhartt Gets Woke \u0026 Gets MASSIVE Backlash From Hard Working Customers!" video.

@A Common Man No according to the old definition. I refuse to use the new definition.
9
@alejandrovallejo4330 "usually when there is a workplace injury it’s because a procedure to prevent injury inside the workplace either failed or wasn’t followed accordingly, thus is the fault of the employer" - Sure. "they have no control over the quality or makeup of the [...] nor who gets a more severe reaction" - Doesn't matter. They mandated it, they need to assume the risk. If they have no control over the quality of that product, and they can't control who gets a reaction, then they're being careless by mandating it. The mandate inherently makes them responsible for a product that isn't theirs, so they assume the risk as if it was theirs. "they can take measures to prevent infection" - Which the product doesn't do. You still get infected and spread. You just suppress the symptoms. " the vast majority of the [...] won’t have severe reactions and they can’t prevent those few that will from reacting severely to it." - Sure. They still need to pay for every red cent of damages they cause. If a thousand workers don't have any severe reactions, but one person has one... That person deserves millions. Why does it matter to you? They can afford the payouts. They can't prevent it? Sure. They assumed the risk. It's their responsability.
2
I call it the "Harvey Weinstein method".
1
@alejandrovallejo4330 They should be liable. If I tell you, as your boss, to unplug a machine and there's an issue with the machine not being grounded and you get shocked, I'm liable for the damages you suffer because I should have made sure the machine was safe before telling you to touch it.
1
@fraserfir19 Tough titties. If it can't be proven, and you were healthy before the shot, the default position should be that the damage was a result of the mandate. If businesses don't want to risk being liable it, they shouldn't mandate it.
1
@alejandrovallejo4330 That's not how it works. First, they have not been widely tested because they've essentially did their best to eliminate the control group. Safe in the overwhelming majority of cases still means payout when it goes wrong. Sure, they don't need to determine safety. Then just need to pay when it isn't. Many people are not known to be medically incapable of taking it until they take it.
1
My brother actually purchases those, there's specialty stores and online sellers that focus on American apparel. Particularly cheap and worn stuff. He got a Carhartt jacket that was imported still has the company patches in the front and the back, it was from a fracking company.
1
@collinstiernagle3553 lol around 30-35 bucks here, the people doing the imports get them really cheap from goodwill stores and such. I don't know how the rest of the market is like, because there's probably people paying more in higher income countries.
1