Comments by "Titanium Rain" (@ChucksSEADnDEAD) on "" video.

@sandbox8717 but Intel does suck, they do overprice their product and they did get stuck when trying to move to a smaller node. And my computer has an Intel CPU so it's not even fanboyism, it's the truth.
2
@sandbox8717 "they give better gaming performance compared to the AMD counterpart" - at a massive premium, you're paying much more to squeeze a little more. "so exactly where's the big absolute deal in choosing 1 of them?" - I don't think there's a big deal, I just saw your complaints and said "but they're right..." "if u affirm "amd is king" u're just saying: "I'm poor, I don't want your overpriced cpus"" - You're a massive hypocrite for saying this.
2
@sandbox8717 Huh, I'm saying that the arguments you complained about are true. Intel messed up and had to stick to 14nm. It is more expensive. And as a company, they do suck for trying to pull these fast ones on the consumer. What else is there to say? "sometimes it's more than 25 fps" - Raw numbers don't tell the tale like relative performance. If it's 50 fps vs 25 fps that's massive. If it's 150 fps vs 175 fps that's different. And sometimes the difference is 10-20. Paying more for 10-20 fps doesn't seem that wise, especially when 1% lows are often much closer than the average fps where Intel gets the clear win. So the use case for the Intel peak gaming performance is playing 1080p medium settings high refresh gaming because AMD can't get the magical 144hz, but you're gonna see dips to the high 80s with Intel too so it's not like you'd get a worse experience with AMD. That's such a narrow case for Intel. "we're not talking about "u're hitting 144 anyway"" - AMD can't hit 144 average in many games. I just take an issue with the arguments you use. "if u're saying: "ppl who claim the complaints u mentioned are right" but then u can't say anything more than: "they're expensive"" - But I said more than that. a) they suck (treat customers like idiots) b) they are indeed more expensive, you complained about this argument but you can't say it's false, I'm only repeating this because you complained about this argument c) they got stuck in a node. Those are three things, they're not false, and for whatever reason you're personally offended at people using these facts against Intel. My last four CPUs are all Intel and I have no problem talking about their shortcomings. In your complaint about AMD fanboys, you turned out to reveal yourself as just as bad of a fanboy.
2
@sandbox8717 I correctly replied to every single one of your issues, you're just looking for a cop out because you know you can't argue against what I said. No offense.
2
@sandbox8717 I've answered anything, you're just pretending not to read. You're only capable of calling people "poor" (even when they're dropping hundreds on high end components) for making conscious financial decisions.
2
@sandbox8717 I've never said those things so that's a strawman. Yes, Intel got stuck with 14nm. Yes, I did answer everything. Read again then describe exactly what I didn't answer, then.
1
@sandbox8717 "intel cpus r good" - Only delusional people think this. "They're just overpriced, that's all" - Literally what I said and you called me "poor" because of it. Even though I run Intel.
1
@sandbox8717 "no u didn't u just repeated over and over amd cpus r cheaper, nothing more" - I literally never said this. You can Ctlr + F and look for it. I didn't.
1