Comments by "Titanium Rain" (@ChucksSEADnDEAD) on "Adam Savage’s Tested" channel.

  1. +Josh88 actually we can disagree because if you look it up several studies performed by the university of melbourne, australian institute of criminology, papers published in the british journal of criminology, etc question the narrative of gun control having done anything because Australian gun deaths were declining for decades before, suicides were declining due to early 90's suicide prevention campaigns and mass shootings also became scarce in New Zealand about the same time despite of the fact that they did not ban semi-autos. The reality is that Australian gun ownership today has surpassed pre-Port Arthur levels and more guns haven't lead to more death.
    2
  2. ECM rifling would have been so much easier.
    2
  3. +Thatguy WhoDoesThings he pretty much "smuggled" the guns into the hotel over 4 days inside travel bags according to the official story. How is carrying travel bags in a hotel "suspicious"?
    1
  4. +RageXBlade which speaks volumes about how little guns are a problem because in 2009 and 2011 accidental firearms deaths hit 100 year lows, ie ever since they started counting. And it wasn't by rate. It was by raw number. ie despite the US having millions and millions more people than in the early 1900's, there's less gun accidents.
    1
  5. It almost doesn't matter. The side where a scope is mounted isn't very important on a pistol, which is meant to be shot away from the body with one hand or just in a 90 degree angle with your chest when using two hands. Having the pistol centered, being right-handed doesn't hinder you if you're right-eye dominant. A person can either be lefty or right-handed to use the scope because it's left eye dominance what could possibly make it harder. Plus, it's sci fi.
    1
  6. There are no mil dots therefore the scope is to be zeroed at a single distance. Doesn't matter where the reticle is as long as it's centered and it doesn't obscure the target.
    1