Comments by "Titanium Rain" (@ChucksSEADnDEAD) on "Paul Joseph Watson" channel.

Eminem was anti-establishment. Criticizing Trump is pro-establishment as it comes, because the establishment is much larger than whichever idiot is holding office. The establishment is the religious right trying to stifle free speech because it's obscene and offensive, and then the progressive side trying to do the same to protect women and minorities. Establishment is the right bombing the shit out of the Middle East while berated by the anti-war left, but then the left gets their man into office and the bombs keep dropping. Eminem's antics actually stood for something, once. Now it's just taking sides.
8
@toddlavigne6441 You mean hospitalizations and ICU admissions are going down after the vulnerable got culled last year and the survivors (the majority) now have some form of immunity? And now that variants are becoming weaker? Great. That should be expected even if you didn't do anything.
3
"Judge" has a negative connotation but the praise for giving up is also a form of judgement. If we can't judge, it should go both ways.
3
@benellis1309 It's not "nonsense". If you do get heart inflammation you may be told to stop exercising by your doctor.
3
@sheiladikshit5110 We're living in reality. Restrictions assume the vaccinated are safe and the filthy unvaxxed cannot live a normal life due to the danger they pose to others. That's reality. Maybe you should be telling this to the people in charge?
2
>I think guns in the U.S. need to be regulated more to stop tragedies like Sandy Hook. Face it, illegal traffic and manufacture of guns can't ever be stopped. The only reason for gun control is controlling the people. >The paranoid ... being scared of your government is beyond pathetic. NDAA, PATRIOT act, etc?
1
@HTW_EDITZ "No one has said it stops transmission" - But they did.
1
@sheiladikshit5110 I don't know why you're shotgunning unrelated subjects at the wall but your question does not make sense. Is loss of privacy a global conspiracy? It seems most countries are passing laws that further violate privacy, undermine cryptography, know-your-customer laws, the controversial IRS audit thing in America. Is this happening or not? I hope you answer yes. If you answered that yes, you recognize many governments are moving against privacy, are you claiming that it's a global conspiracy?
1
You think we're not divided already?
1
>Sandy Hook where the weapons were acquired legally >killing own mother >legal Protip: don't use the words "sensible" or "common sense" before "control" or "laws". We're used to insane laws being called that. Anders Breivik, The Columbine shooters and John Holmes: all of them made explosives. Being illegal is not a hurdle. Passing laws using mass shootings (a small fraction of gun violence) will not affect most of gun murders and will only become a hurdle to law abiding citizens.
1
Aenema by Tool is actually a pretty good song. Here in this hopeless fucking hole we call L.A. / The only way to fix it is to flush it all away Any fucking time. Any fucking day / Learn to swim, I'll see you down in Arizona Bay
1