Comments by "Titanium Rain" (@ChucksSEADnDEAD) on "‘If It Would Save The Life of Just One Child:' Gun Owner Destroys 30-Year-Old AR-15" video.

  1. He committed a crime by cutting the barrel. He's a "reasonable" gun owner who doesn't even know/follow gun laws and made an illegal short barrel rifle. How is that decent?
    2
  2. Respect for what? committing a felony by shortening the barrel?
    1
  3. +M T if he is so responsible why did he violate the law by shortening a barrel? Without ATF approval it's illegal to saw off a barrel. Why are you applauding a felony caught on video?
    1
  4. I'd suggest reading this document if you have the time: http://www.parliament.uk/documents/post/pn087.pdf But here's the summary if you don't : "Other ideas voiced after the Dunblane massacre included a system requiring holders of firearms and shotguns to obtain an annual certificate of fitness to hold a firearm from their doctor each year. The gun lobby objected to this, citing the cost, and the British Medical Association [BMA] also opposed the move, claiming that it would be impossible for doctors to provide such “sanity certificates.” [30] While past mental illness, alcoholism, and drug addiction is taken into account when issuing firearms or shot gun certificates, "it is virtually impossible for a doctor to make a judgement about someone’s fitness to hold a gun, according to the BMA." . . . And given the number of certificates issued annually—each is renewable every three years—"it would be frankly impossible for psychiatrists to provide a full psychiatric examination of everyone holding a certificate, and there would be no guarantee even then that you would spot the people at risk." [31] Doctors were also concerned over their potential liability if they provided a clean bill of health for a certificate and the holder later went on a rampage. [https://www.loc.gov/law/help/firearms-control/greatbritain.php]
    1