Comments by "Titanium Rain" (@ChucksSEADnDEAD) on "The Hated One" channel.

Google started off with support from the Pentagon and CIA.
31
But doctors said BLM protests did not increase cases. Don't you trust the science?
3
@NawidN Pretty sure Australia prides itself in not being the US.
3
WE LIVE IN A PERIOD BOTTOM TEXT
2
Jesus. He probably uses Linux based on comment he left here, and uses a "fake" account on youtube. Nkt to mention he knows how to prevent being tracked and how to use a VPN.
2
spim randsley what evidence? 2 years and what - 40 million spent, right? - and their last hope is Cohen saying that Trump used campaign money rather than private money to hush an affair?
2
spim randsley "Now you say there's no evidence besides what they've found so far" - so you are confirming that the only evidence is a claim by some guy who could simply make anything up? Because it's really important that you confirm it for me.
2
spim randsley there you go, you say absolutely nothing. You admitted it yourself, if you were wrong you'd waste someone else's time. You haven't addressed the topic and circled around it. Take the fucking L.
2
@Bernddd you're still creating inflation because prices will adjust to the new market tolerance. Things are worth what people are willing to pay for them, and if everyone is richer by a certain amount they will tolerate a rise in prices as long as they can still afford it.
2
@Bernddd "keep the free market in check with maximum prices?" - we already know price controls backfire. You can't have a "free market" and then try to pull levers and press switches to micromanage it because that's how you send things into full meltdown.
2
They don't have our best interests at heart. They were willing to cooperate with the Chinese government in censoring their web search, do you think that is having the Chinese people's interests at heart? They have proven themselves to be willing to betray the user for profit in China, you think they won't do it here? Also major corporations get hacked.
1
@user-mh2om6ss1z funny maymay, but still doesn't change the fact that you chucklefucks have almost every single time put a bloodthirsty tyrant in power.
1
@lottabee "Because there's a difference between socialism/communism and authoritarianism." - socialism and communism are inherently authoritarian because you need to repress any attempt to create capitalism.
1
That's a terrible argument. You can google (heh) "nothing to hide argument" and read up on multiple rebuttals of that bs argument.
1
It's also illegal to sell drugs, that's why nobody does it.
1
@andreamitchell4758 "did nazi that coming"
1
The biggest irony: having to take the vax to see Matrix 4. (yeah I assume you'll be allowed to do a test to enter the theater, it's just a joke)
1
FDR already did it.
1
@lohphat "Libertarians say that taxation is like theft because it takes property from the unwilling. What they ignore, time and time again, is the crucial role of democratic consent" - when was the last time there was a democratic referendum regarding taxes? Also, democratic consent is a joke. 9 out of 10 people consent to a gang rape. You don't get to consent for me and I don't get to consent for you. "Taxes are not arbitrary impositions decreed by a faceless government" - they pretty much are. Financial policy is too complex for populist rhetoric and is mostly done behind closed doors. Not only are the hordes of unelected bureaucrats a literal manifestation of a "faceless government" but the taxation is pretty much arbitrary as the politicians in power make decisions based not with infinite wisdom but with personal biases, ideological and political constraints, etc. "Rather, taxes are the dues we pay in exchange for membership in a society and access to all the services it offers." - How do I revoke my membership? How can I cancel those services? In order for a membership or service to make sense I need to be able to withdraw my money. When dealing with an organization or provider my ability to sever my ties is the only form of leverage I have. "If you believe the price is too high, you’re free to renounce your membership and leave the club. What you’re not free to do is to refuse to pay, but demand that you still be allowed to sit in the club and use its facilities" - BULLSHIT. The equivalent would be a private club demanding that you pay even if you don't set foot inside the club. "Nor are you free, if the club doesn’t offer this option, to decide that you only use some of its services – only the swimming pool, say, but not the sauna or the tennis courts – and should therefore have the right to pay a prorated membership fee." - that's fucking ridiculous because there's many health clubs that have pricing systems where you only pay for what you use. Somehow several tiers of a service is a pie in the sky ordeal to the stupid mutherfucker who wrote this article. "If you don’t want to pay, if you dislike its terms, you can leave that society" - No, you can't. The government is making it harder for you to renounce citizenship by increasing the fees and demanding more bureaucracy such as requiring you to have citizenship in another country before you're allowed to renounce yours. The private club is now holding you hostage, demanding money and saying that you can't leave until you prove that you have bought a membership into another club. THIS IS A CRIME. "But you are not free to unilaterally demand that society rewrite its terms to favor your particular preferences." - you're not free to unilaterally demand that society rewrite its terms to favor your particular preferences. I'm gonna live in your house and eat your food. You're not free to demand me to leave. Respect your property? That's just your personal preference. "As centuries of history show, the natural state of an unregulated economy is not free competition, but stifled and constrained competition" - BULLSHIT LOL WE HAD CENTURIES OF MONARCHY AND NO FREEDOM AT ALL AND AS REGULATION INCREASES COMPETITION IS MORE AND MORE STIFLED. All major media companies are owned by like 6 groups. Facebook owns Whatsapp and Instagram. Patreon had competitors killed with the help of PayPal and MasterCard. Look at how Amazon is taking over. We're living in the age where there's less competition and everything is being owned by the same people but PLEASE tell me how regulation is good and doesn't stifle competition at all. "Large, established powers, if given the chance, will do everything they can to suppress competition" - such as buying off government officials or blackmailing them with all the revenue and jobs they control. OH MY GOD THIS GUY IS AN ABSOLUTE MORON: "industry groups may take a hand in designing regulations that make it all but impossible for new players to enter the field" then later "To maintain the preferable state of a free market, we need structure and regulation from the government" MOTHERFUCKER ADMITS THAT INDUSTRY WRITES REGULATION AND THEN CLAIMS REGULATION IS THE ANSWER "Outright intimidation, fraud and violence are often used against those who refuse to play along. Even the staunchly libertarian Cato Institute admits this:" - the article he links too and quotes out of context. The article linked is about how corporations use the government as a tool to squash competition and Adam Lee twists it into making you think the Cato institute is pro-government regulation. "In my experience, most libertarians concede that some regulation is needed, but argue that they should only be taxed for services that benefit them directly. This is like demanding that businesses sell their goods to you for exactly what it cost to make them and no more" - this is garbage. It's not equivalent at all. The price of a service is set at the equilibrium point between where a customer is willing to pay and where a company is willing to sacrifice their margins. If you demand for a cheaper service and the business can't do it or else they can't make money, you either stop consuming or you keep paying. If you're only taxed for the benefits you claimed, you pay fair and square for the cost of those services. " Just like any business, the government is entitled to “turn a profit”" - BU LL SH IT most governments run on a deficit, they spend every little red cent and then some. They contract debt by running on a deficit which then they try to pay off years later with the growth of the economy. Governments turning a profit? What? "Just as with a business, these proceeds can be reinvested" - this guy is fucking delusional. Money isn't "reinvested" by the government. It's all spent. Spending on infrastructure are "overhead" costs. When a company saves money and invests it, they're essentially starting "new" business by expanding their capacity or even buying new facilities. Countries don't save money to start more countries. This guy is purposefully conflating the concept of profits with revenue. When a business gets its revenue it """"""reinvests"""""" that money into raw materials, tooling, payroll, etc. but that's not "reinvestment" that's simply paying for the overhead costs. Those costs eat into your margins and thus reduce your profits. Your profits is what you actually take and keep in a war chest or redistribute towards shareholders as dividend, etc. You can then REINVEST into the business by hiring more personnel, buying more machines or even opening a new facility. And no, building roads and hospitals isn't reinvestment, that's the overhead because you have paying customers who you can't serve and thus you must bear the costs of doing business. Investment means you want to get something out of it, but you won't get something if the people already paid. "If taxes are spent unwisely or wasted, the answer is to elect better politicians" - JUST VOTE HARDER, PEASANT TL;DR - the guy who wrote that argument is a total moron and I've defeated all of his arguments
1
@bbenny9033 "we are already hitting high vax rates" - Bruh it confers 2 months immunity then it's done, antibodies that help against hospitalization wear off in 6-8 months. Even CNN has reported on it. You really think that after almost two years, something made against the wild strain will work against Delta and future variants? Keep dreaming.
1
@bbenny9033 BS. First of all, with 70% the transmission chains would be broken everywhere. The spread would stall because there would be not enough people to serve as hosts, and many social distancing and mask mandates are still up. Wrong. Not only does the genetic makeup of SF Bay area infections show that it's the double-dosed that are 78% carrying an antibody-resistant strain, you cannot have a fully dosed population at any time. Distribution does not allow it. How do you produce that many doses and administer them all at the same time? A vaccination campaign will always last for months, so by your own standards you'll never accomplish what you want.
1
spim randsley "that is wrong" - just saying something is wrong (you actually didn't) doesn't make it wrong- Your post: "Last month you said there's no evidence. Now you say there's no evidence besides what they've found so far. Your excuses are just wishful thinking playing catchup with reality... always one deranged step behind." - you made no mention about anything being wrong and yet you claim that you did.
1
spim randsley what mistake? You haven't pointed out any mistake. "I did in fact say you were wrong" - you didn't. You're hiding behind weasel words. You have no argument so you grasp at straws. You're unwilling to be intellectually honest. You'll cling on anything that justifies your personal opinions and world view. I have no horse in this race. If Trump goes down, he goes. Sun will keep shining and the grass will keep growing. But the fact that people like you are so personally invested in the Trump Derrangement Syndrome is hilarious as fuck.
1
spim randsley lel you're the one who comes in here "waaaa they'll get t-trump, you'll see" and you claim I am emotionally bound to anything? I'm not wasting your time. I asked, is there anything left except Cohen's testimony? After 2 years and an estimated 30 million (the 40 million claim was debunked, apparently)? Is this the best they got?
1
@Bernddd where? I want to see this price-controlled universal basic income project working because not even Yang has mentioned it.
1
"the beginning of freedom, when we are in a world without scarcity, and no jobs" - how can there be no scarcity and no jobs? If nobody is doing their job, everything is scarce because nobody is producing anything. "The A.I. is our salvation" - fuck the AI
1
The real corruption is legal and the more taxes collected, the more money the government will siphon into the pockets of the rich.
1
When you pay in cash the store doesn't actually "collect" that revenue until after the money leaves the store safe and is deposited in the bank through a valuables handling service. From the time you pay until it's in the bank that value is not usable by the company to purchase stock, for example. Which means there will always be a lag between the moment of purchase and the money becoming available. For you, the consumer, the money leaves the wallet instantly. But to anyone managing the store it doesn't arrive instantly.
1
Only the people with severe schizophrenia, I think.
1
"National stability and security is important" - giving up freedom for security will get you neither "if the provider is honest and being checked" - were you born yesterday?
1
"The less cash we have to use the less we are exposed to the preying instincts" - and yet cybercrime and fraud increase... really makes one think "inflation, interest rate" - you do realize that inflation and interest hits you just the same even if you don't have cash, right?
1
Credit card theft happens all the time, and autopay is essentially a psychological trick to make us less able to handle our money.
1
If they do that and money becomes worthless they also kneecap the financial and industrial sector. That would be a nuclear option.
1
"Cashless payments will be the biggest single advance against crime" - not really, crime will still happen. Imagine that instead of having a knife or gun pointed at you for cash it will be to hand them your card and unlock your phone for them.
1
I mean, who cares about freedom when you can profit off it, right?
1
Why would one need to suffer due to the laws in some other country?
1