Comments by "Titanium Rain" (@ChucksSEADnDEAD) on "I am an NYC business owner and I will NOT follow Mayor DeBlasio's order." video.

@RayManiac90 Are politicians scientists? No. Are scientists politicians? No. Neither of them should be able to ignore consent and force you do to things against your will.
7
@DavidStrchld You align with love by asking the government to step on us with its jackboots.
5
@tensemurm5924 The scientific consensus it out there. I gave you some reading material. I guess Mr. Scientist here is not interested. People died because the "science" apparently didn't reach the ERs and ICUs. My mind is made up. You should know the mechanisms behind fatalities. If Mr. Scientist here wants to stick his head in the sand, or the tube down his windpipe in this case, he's free to do so.
4
@asdrubale bisanzio You just exposed yourself as an eugenicist. At this point you'd fit pretty well in 1933 Germany.
4
@senerzen In fact if you got it naturally you have T-cells with long term memory. You will continue having an immune response even after running out of antibodies. If you take the shot, you will get antibodies but they will decrease over time.
3
@tensemurm5924 Again with strawmanning. Bro you already lost. I thought you were a scientist. You can't argue except by twisting others' words. No science, only lies. Go away and go brag about being a scientist somewhere else.
3
@asdrubale bisanzio Herd immunity used to be defined by people getting immune through natural means. They changed the definition to only include the shot. Taking the shot doesn't prevent new strains. You tell us that we don't know how things work, but you're here selling your narrative that's blatantly contradicted by the official narrative. If the normal people are taking the shot, then how could anti-vax people hurt them? You just contradicted your own narrative.
3
@FrangezM "It would've stayed voluntary if enough people volunteered to reach the threshold for herd immunity. Now that that hasn't happened, other measures have to be taken" - Then it's not voluntary. Stop playing games. It's not voluntary if there's an obligation to fill a quota.
2
@fallagainstmorellet But you can't eradicate it if the shot only minimizes symptoms. Give up freedom to consent? Please think twice before posting. That sounds disgusting.
2
@fallagainstmorellet You can't reach herd immunity with a shot that still allows you to carry and transmit the pathogen.
2
@LetsTakeWalk If it's not 100% perfect it won't work because there's still always a group of vaccinated people acting as unvaccinated. Also, your own propaganda states that it doesn't necessarily make you immune, it just reduces symptoms and reduces likelihood of hospitalization. Which means more people transmitting.
2
@RayManiac90 No, they're not. They're actually contradicting what we know. You trust science? Science is just a process. You trust the process? Okay, what do you know about the science on the topic? How many studies have you read? The greater good is always used to justify atrocities. Come up with a better argument. You're okay with gunning down people if they refuse?
1
@TheRetenor This isn't Ebola. And by the way Ebola outbreaks were easier to contain precisely because of how serious the symptoms are. SARS 1 was deadlier, and the outbreak was contained.
1
@fallagainstmorellet The law of large numbers has nothing to do with the topic.
1
@jefferytownsend7787 How will they weed themselves out? If anything, it will make their population stronger because their offspring will come from people who don't get sick from it.
1
@tensemurm5924 The millions of people affected by it were sacrificed for profit. You can read the actual scientific studies that show the mechanisms of the infection and how they damage the body by triggering inflammatory response, cell death pathways and directly affecting the hemoglobin. If you understood, you'd have realized the sham.
1
@tensemurm5924 There's no contradiction. Nice strawman, an admission of loss. One strike and you're out. You're done. Pravin T Goud,1,2 David Bai,3 and Husam M Abu-Soud, A Multiple-Hit Hypothesis Involving Reactive Oxygen Species and Myeloperoxidase Explains Clinical Deterioration and Fatality in COVID-19, Int J Biol Sci. 2021; 17(1): 62–72. Paari Dominicabc, Javaria Ahmada, Ruchi Bhandarid, Sibile Parduee, Juan Solorzanoa, Keerthish Jaisingha, Megan Watts, Steven R.Bailey, A. Wayne Orrbcef, Christopher G., Kevilbcef Gopi, K.Kolluruce, Decreased availability of nitric oxide and hydrogen sulfide is a hallmark of COVID-19, Redox Biology Volume 43, July 2021, 101982 Mitsuhiro Yokoyama, Ken-ichi Hirata, Endothelial nitric oxide synthase uncoupling: Is it a physiological mechanism of endothelium-dependent relaxation in cerebral artery?, Cardiovascular Research, Volume 73, Issue 1, January 2007, Pages 8–9 Martin L. Pall, The NO/ONOO-Cycle as the Central Cause of Heart Failure, Int J Mol Sci. 2013 Nov; 14(11): 22274–22330. Wanyi Fang, Jingrui Jiang, Lei Su, Tong Shu, Huan Liu, Shenghan Lai, Reza A. Ghiladi, and Jun Wanga, The role of NO in COVID-19 and potential therapeutic strategies, Free Radic Biol Med. 2021 Feb 1; 163: 153–162. Maria Grazia Signorello, Silvia Ravera, and Giuliana Leoncinia, Lectin-induced oxidative stress in human platelets, Redox Biol. 2020 May; 32: 101456. Eli Gilad, Salvatore Cuzzocrea, Basilia Zingarelli, Andrew L.Salzman, Csaba Szabó, Melatonin is a scavenger of peroxynitrite, Life Sciences Volume 60, Issue 10, 31 January 1997, Pages PL169-PL174 Yadi Zhou, Yuan Hou, Jiayu Shen, Reena Mehra, Asha Kallianpur, Daniel A. Culver, Michaela U. Gack, Samar Farha, Joe Zein, Suzy Comhair, Claudio Fiocchi, Thaddeus Stappenbeck, Timothy Chan, Charis Eng, Jae U. Jung, Lara Jehi, Serpil Erzurum, Feixiong Cheng, A network medicine approach to investigation and population-based validation of disease manifestations and drug repurposing for COVID-19, 10.1371/ journal.pbio.3000970
1
@tensemurm5924 You're the Scientist who so far hasn't brought up any science. I'm the only one not chatting shite. You are.
1
@tensemurm5924 You tried to trap me with your BS gotcha. I gave you the information. You're welcome to draw your conclusions. You bragged about your scientific background but you can't be bothered to do any digging. I agree with the scientific consensus. You agree with what the TV says. Those are not the same. And if you used your scientific background you'd have realized it by now. So yes, you're the one chatting shite because you've been parroting people who have demonstrated to be wrong all along and who ignore the actual science.
1
@Opeandaway China has a three child policy now because they're hurling down a demographics collapse. They also have a massive disparity between men and women because of the aborted girls. You make a deal with the devil, it always comes back to collect.
1
It does seem to discriminate. It doesn't want to enter my body no matter how many times I've been exposed to the sick and I always test clean. Seems like that pathetic little bug doesn't want none of this smoke.
1