Comments by "Titanium Rain" (@ChucksSEADnDEAD) on "CDC discourages FULLY VACCINATED people from cruises: WHAT?" video.

  1. Who decides who is an expert?
    10
  2.  @oroville12345  MGTOW simping for msm and billion dollar companies lmao
    4
  3.  @zzaretube  How it would have stopped anything?
    4
  4.  @zzaretube  They certainly have no reason to lie.
    4
  5.  @oak1780  The government didn't stop them? In the US it scared businesses into mandating it, and in many countries you're denied access to public transportation and stores.
    4
  6.  @AbyssalMelody  How is it so hard to understand that they were sold as a miracle? How is it so hard to understand that people had the figurative gun pressed to their head to take it, due to their job/travel/education? We've been through massive abuse of power, and now everything's back to square one. If you still simp for the LIARS in charge you are as guilty as them.
    2
  7.  @goblin6587  How is it a bad faith argument?
    2
  8. How does that boot taste?
    2
  9.  @thilehoffer  Then you're not paying attention.
    2
  10. My brother had the shot and he was sick for a day longer than me. How would you know you'd have been pretty bad?
    2
  11.  @alpyre  The trials were done by the corporations that made the product. Of course they worked. A whistleblower actually reported them to the FDA for tampering the results and nothing was done.
    2
  12.  @alpyre  There's no classical that's accepted in most of the West. Both mRNA and viral vector are novel. They're brand new. They're not well practiced, in fact mRNA never made it into human trials. They only pushed through thanks to emergency use authorization.
    2
  13. It's going to happen anyway so what difference does it make? It's me who doesn't understand. If you have to issue those recommendations it's about time to get in front of the TV cameras, live in front of the country, admit you were wrong and quit your job right on the spot. If I did this poor of a job I'd be fired. But apparently government institutions can get things consistently wrong.
    1
  14.  @ErikUden  If you told people to take the shot to solve the problem and the problem isn't solved, you broke people's trust. You don't get to keep barking orders at people, you lose the job and bring in someone who still has credibility. That's how it works, and anyone with a shred of morality would think that their job was worth losing if it meant doing the right thing. Now I have to question, were they even thinking they were doing the right thing or were they straight up lying?
    1
  15.  @ErikUden  Am I going to have to hunt down a video that hopefully hasn't been taking down yet compiling the promises that they've made? They did claim it would solve everything. They did claim it would give very high levels of resistant, in fact a certain fraud claimed that in real life the effectiveness was ever higher than in trials. Probabilities? My father, mother and brother got the shots and all of them got it. How's that for a probability? In my family, it had a 0% success rate so far. How about those probabilities? You're happy you took a high risk for something that didn't solve the problem, forcing you to in the future having to get something else again? What do you think were your chances of being hospitalized if you hadn't taken it? There's online calculators for that, you should probably check it out.
    1
  16.  @guillaumegagnon7049  No offense, but I pray the backend for that QR app is destroyed by a disaster or gets hacked by a good Samaritan.
    1
  17.  @mariuszj3826  How does boosting against the 2019 Wuhan strain do anything against a late 2021 strain?
    1
  18.  @makasete30  But ask yourself - highly effective at what? My mother is boosted. She still got sick. The only difference is in symptoms. This makes it clear it's not working the way you think it is, but you call it effective even when it should be called for what it is - INEFFECTIVE, but potentially live saving for those at very high risk. By logic alone you wouldn't take a 2019 flu shot in 2022. You have to actually think about the mechanism that's actually at play and not what you're trying to convince us.
    1
  19. You're the ones being misleading. You're trying to make a comparison that cannot be made due to the inherent differences in population and strains. Numbers now come from a population that had the most vulnerable culled in several waves, and with a strain that is milder. You can't attribute the differences to a single factor.
    1
  20.  @goblin6587  You think calling me a name you learned from MSM or reddit insults me? You have nothing else to offer except the insults you've been programmed to use.
    1
  21.  @goblin6587  I'd rather be the NPC than a player character doing the bad morality run.
    1
  22.  @zzaretube  BS. NATO joined the GWOT. In fact Spain and the UK suffered bombings as a response to their participation.
    1
  23. Living life through never-ending restrictions even if you've been boosted?
    1
  24.  @thilehoffer  In many countries even if you are boosted and have a negative test, you were still limited to 6 people per dinner party these holidays. There were many NYE events cancelled worldwide.
    1
  25.  @thilehoffer  Depends on the state. If for whatever reason you live in a place with a mask mandate, that's still a restriction imposed on you no matter how much you boost. So in the end you're still trapped in the treadmill even if you try to move on.
    1
  26. Deaths are not peaking because omicron is milder. This is also seen in South Africa, where the rate is lower.
    1