Comments by "Titanium Rain" (@ChucksSEADnDEAD) on "New vaccine mandate in NYC; why my business is not complying" video.

  1. In many countries they essentially made policy that any doctor saying anything against the spike will be investigated by the governing medical association. They won't necessarily investigate everyone or revoke licenses, but most doctors aren't willing to risk it.
    33
  2.  @jenh9426  You don't benefit the society by taking a symptom suppressor that still allows you to spread.
    10
  3.  @Old_mother_hubbards_chubbard  Get off your high horse. The vaccinated still spread but you people think you're not responsible. So you have no business calling anyone out for losing responsability.
    9
  4. So it's okay that the state came to break your legs with baseball bats as long as they pay the hospital bill?
    6
  5.  @Catssonova  Nothing is free. It comes out of your taxes you disingenuous little shill.
    5
  6.  @MayaPosch  Maya, do you want to live in the 19th century? Because if we're going by what was moral and legal in the 19th century you need to go all the way, not just the tidbits you like.
    5
  7. If someone dies, surgery can't fix it. Liability isn't enough. Paying a settlement doesn't bring people back, and the money comes from the public anyway.
    5
  8. The vaxxed still spread. They still harm others.
    4
  9.  @Magpie1701  You can take the hardhat off the worksite. You can't suck this stuff off once it gets into you. That's one way it's different. You can't undo the damage if you're one of the unlucky few. Health is worth more than the income. You can't pay me enough to suffer a stroke or heart attack.
    4
  10. Very high vaccination rates have not ended it in several countries. Womp womp.
    4
  11.  @DerbyMods  They're not keeping you safe. It doesn't block transmission.
    3
  12. It doesn't stop the spread. Even people who took it can still infect you.
    3
  13. Based based based
    3
  14.  @Catssonova  Shill. And I bet you do it for free.
    3
  15.  @noahleach7690  You're like a five year old. That's it. You're just childish.
    3
  16. "If we reach the point of social ostracism that means the percentage of those getting vaccinated will increase" - Beatings will continue until the morale improves. "we are going to reach a point where the virus mutates and the vaccine is not effective" - This happens every year. The shot was formulated for the genetic sequence revealed by the WIV, which dates back to 2019. It's almost 2022. Get a grip. Mutations is what viruses at good at. Deal with it.
    3
  17. He can't get the protection of others. People who had it still spread. No, it doesn't affect the risk for others, because again, you still spread. They can't impose greater risks on everyone around them, because they still spread. Nobody was morally culpable for spreading other viruses before.
    3
  18.  @OMIMox  The gloves are an actual barrier. The shot gives you a false sense of security and allows you to host and spread without knowing.
    3
  19. Wow and moderna is the one with the highest dose. What a rip off.
    2
  20. Nobody was liable for outbreaks before 2020. Also, you still spread after taking it, so the outbreak would happen anyway. The public health policy has been nothing but flip flops and half truths since the early 2020. It's now that they got it right? I doubt it.
    2
  21.  @BargainBarons  Shill. We're not talking about effectiveness. You people just copy paste excuses. Why are you parroting talking points? It doesn't stop the spread even according to the manufacturers, the effectiveness rate is just calculated by suppression of symptoms. 100% effective, 99% effective, 95% effective, or 40% effective (after six months) it was never meant to stop spread. It was just marketed as such by the media and governments. So people can get sick and die, as long as the business owner "did his part"? This is immoral and people like you need to see the error in your ways because you're actively ruining the world with your attitude.
    2
  22. Yeah the increase in heart conditions in 2021 was all clogged arteries. Tons of people get stronger side effects after the second dose. This was known months ago. The doctor simply doesn't want to put his license on the line by writing that recommendation.
    2
  23. You see, you also got fooled by the "horse paste" story. The only reason people resorted to horse paste was because pharmacists were literally denying to fulfill legitimate prescriptions. Even people who were prescribed it for parasites were being denied. Full disclosure, I know several people who used the horse paste instead of ordering off sketchy websites. It works fine on humans. It just tastes weird.
    2
  24. F off. You are liable for the dangers that come with the job. If you required someone to turn on a machine, and the machine zaps them, you're liable. Nobody's demanding a set of rules. You're simply liable for what happens inside your home. And the things you make happen carry consequences.
    2
  25. It's almost 2022 and the shot is for a 2019 strain. You be the judge.
    2
  26. What a crock of s. Heart conditions are on the rise in 2021, and not in 2020 when we didn't have the shot. How does that explanation even make sense?
    2
  27.  @PaulTheadra  "if a large part of the population get sick, leave the workforce or disrupt their bottom line of gov/corps" - But the government is still advocating for widespread testing, which means people will be self-isolating anyway. No matter the way we slice it, sick or not the government is sending labor home.
    2
  28. "People have their cancer operations suspended because intensive care is full of unvaccinated covid patients" - Still pushing this narrative? "So the choice of not getting vaccinated is now affecting others people right of getting proper healthcare" - No. The state mismanaging resources and suspending diagnosis and surgeries last year caused that. "we witness a full on propaganda war against scientific facts" - No, we're watching a full on propaganda war from the government and news media.
    2
  29.  @joshuasisson6816  Scientists know. You just don't hear the "scientists" on TV talk about it.
    1
  30.  @martiananomaly  Then it should be about personal choice. Thanks for proving my point and admitting your original comment was wrong.
    1
  31. You can still spread after taking the shot. So no violations of freedom are occurring by refusing it. I make a conscious decision to expose myself to risk. You cannot force me to take a risk against my will. There's people who don't like driving. There's people who don't like alcohol.
    1
  32.  @MrSmotrelkin  I think my reply got omitted. Convinient. I can talk about this without my posts getting deleted but it seems if I get into specifics it gets sent to the shadow realm.
    1
  33.  @DanielHilz  Wrong. There's liability. People can volunteer for dangerous things, you're still liable. If you mandate it for work, then it was an injury on the job. Pay up.
    1
  34.  @DanielHilz  Nobody is forced to turn on a faulty machine either. When it happens and someone gets hurt, the employer is liable.
    1
  35.  @DanielHilz  You can't sue for enforcing a mandate, you can sue for damages for following the mandate. You can't sue the manufacturers because by law they are immune from liability. Businesses mandating it aren't. Big Pharma is using you - or business owners, if you're not one - as a human shield. We only got one shot at the King, but I'm willing to see all the King's pawns slayed as a consequence for doing his bidding.
    1
  36. We saw new variants before the first shot was even deployed. It's impossible to give the shot at the same time to everyone in every country of every age group. We will never catch up and it's about time we admit it.
    1
  37. And then you get infected anyway because it doesn't stop the spread, only suppresses symptoms.
    1
  38.  @jeffreyparker9396  How does it prove your point? You make the argument regarding society rather than personal benefit, and now you flip flop back to personal benefit even though your argument regarding the social good was demolished. You're the one proving my point by making this about PERSONAL choice as it only affects the person who takes it.
    1
  39.  @PaulTheadra  Okay, that's not the point. My point is that if governments were doing this for the bottom line, they would restrict testing to hide asymptomatic cases to keep people working. The way things are now, an entire chunk of the workforce can be sent home because someone tested positive. Even though nobody's sick. I don't have an issue with testing, I'm saying that the explanation you proposed doesn't seem to work when the government is royally effing with a company's ability to be productive by forcing healthy staff into isolation.
    1
  40.  @dipropyltryptamin2815  Unable or unwilling?
    1