Comments by "Titanium Rain" (@ChucksSEADnDEAD) on "Johnny Harris" channel.

  1.  @Melksh1  "that's exactly what I'm saying" that you people always have a conspiracy theory to criticize whatever we do or don't do?
    12
  2. ​ @Melksh1  I love how we're simultaneously accused of caring about muslims selectively and also of not caring.
    10
  3. The US didn't invade Ukraine, though.
    3
  4. The craft isn't rolling. The pod is. So the mirrors and lenses are rotating to keep the horizon stable. The smudge is an artifact from the lenses which rotates to keep the image stable.
    2
  5. Well the crazy doctor wrote the notes as if he were a terrorist to throw off the scent.
    2
  6. A corner reflector inside a balloon. The US has used those to trick Cuban radars.
    2
  7. Nobody wants to look like a fool so they double down instead of admitting they were bamboozled.
    2
  8. No. It's a contrast aid. Edge detection software creates a halo around the object to aid the pilot. You can disable this setting to make it disappear.
    2
  9. But the invasion had 8k civilian casualties. Mariupol alone had 22k.
    2
  10.  @TinCupChalice40  No. These cameras are better than you think. You're just used to 1080p/4k cameras being used to capture people from 6-7 feet away. Now use those cameras at night to see tanks from 20 miles away. You can't. The jet fighters can. They're using state of the art optics. You can't develop better right now.
    2
  11. These cameras are made to blow up tanks from 20 miles away, at night. Not to film Hollywood blockbusters.
    2
  12.  @jorgeillueca5260  You assume they are maneuvering and travelling at speeds not possible. Meanwhile it could be just optical illusion.
    2
  13.  @paulbellino5330  footage being real just means it wasn't tampered with. Real footage of a balloon is real. Great revelation...
    2
  14. People don't know the difference between gunshots and fireworks. Demolition charges would have scattered detcord remains all over New York - none were ever found.
    2
  15.  @lance5041  If the footage was debunked, we depend on the fallible eyes and memory of the pilots.
    2
  16. No, they were looking at the pod. Object was too distant for visual.
    1
  17. Did he explain why he was caught twice trying to look for young girls on nthe internet?
    1
  18. Scott Ritter was in prison for p3dophilia and WMDs were found. American soldiers suffered neurological damage from nerve gas exposure when they found them. It's unfortunate Scott Ritter wasn't there to take the damage instead of them.
    1
  19. There's videos inside of cockpits where the displays were filmed (perhaps accidently) and the image these pods obtain is crisp.
    1
  20. There were WMDs in Iraq, though.
    1
  21. But you weren't sold a war. Russia invaded. You had no say in the matter. No buy, no sell.
    1
  22. What do you question about Ukraine? The denazification? Yeah that was a poor excuse.
    1
  23. How? The US didn't invade.
    1
  24. Element 115 was theorized about in science magazines before Bob Lazar started talking about it. He simply read scientific articles to sound smart.
    1
  25. The invasion killed 8k people. The rest were killed by sectarian violence and "insurgents" (terrorists).
    1
  26.  @cosmocosmandoo9074  that's still acceleration. Any change to velocity is acceleration.
    1
  27. Russia invaded, not the US.
    1
  28. The war mongers are in Moscow.
    1
  29. Other military forces do not disclose it, while in the US things like FOIA requests can get footage declassified.
    1
  30. GoPros do not capture better footage and do not see the thermal spectrum.
    1
  31.  @lauramurman2642  They have good cameras. Take any camera you want and try to look at tanks from 20 miles away. At night. You're not going to see anything. The jet fighters can.
    1
  32. It isn't. The US didn't invade.
    1
  33. Or, the contrast tracker algorithm was acting up. Targeting pods are not infallible.
    1
  34. The horizon is spinning, camera has internal mirror to "derotate" the spinning. This causes horizon to appear stable, but the smear (like astigmatism) spins. The pilots are not used to these smears.
    1
  35. Because the objects are like 10 miles away. Bring the fanciest 4k camera you have, it won't even see the object.
    1
  36. Mick West has the entire explanation in his channel.
    1
  37. ​ @together4Hiscause  If Russia was so afraid of NATO, why didbthe Pskov base have no air defense to handle the Ukrainian drones? Russia has been close to NATO for decades.
    1
  38. ​ @JoeRogan-DaveSmith2028  1. There was no coup if the government showed up to the Verkhovna Rada and voted. The legitinaye government was not overthrown, they saw the president went AWOL and voted for snap elections. 2. Irrelevant. Crimea did not declare independence from Ukraine. It was seized by Russian troops and a referendum held at gunpoint. Certainly you saw the 2022 referenda in Ukraine with empty ballots being tallied as "Yes", right?
    1
  39.  @JoeRogan-DaveSmith2028  Biden doesn't matter. The wheels are in motion. This conflict has been going on before the United States existed. You're a lot less important than you think. The world keeps spinning. Force peace terms? How are you going to force those?
    1
  40. Chile released UAP footage from a naval helicopter. It was years ago, and Mick West and his contributors at metabunk solved it.
    1
  41. Satellite (and aircraft) spy cameras are works of art. FLIR pods are for warfare.
    1
  42. Bob Lazar worked at a print shop.
    1
  43.  @tplyons5459  Damn everyone seems to have worked with Bob in Los Alamos but nobody is willing to corroborate his stories.
    1
  44. That number was never confirmed, it was based on rubbish studies.
    1
  45. Mick West proves that nobody is above question. Pilots are not gods.
    1
  46. ​ @Shrimpspiration  It wasn't about bases, Castro wanted control over nuclear missiles. Even Krushchev saw that Castro could not be trusted with nukes.
    1
  47. No, it's a radar reflector inside a balloon.
    1
  48. Yes, it is. The image is being stabilized by mirror rotation, which causes the horizon to be stabilized but the "object" (lens smudge) to rotate.
    1
  49. No. It's a contrast aid. It's a setting on the pod.
    1
  50. Because the aircraft is spinning, and the lenses are spinning inside the pod to stabilize the footage. The smear is created by the lenses, so that object appears to spin. The rest of the image does not.
    1
  51. The US did find weapons. Several US servicemen suffered neurological damage from being exposed to nerve agents - but their health issues were covered up for about a decade.
    1
  52. The optics are rotating to keep the footage stabilized.
    1
  53. Yeah. Because the US didn't invade, Russia did.
    1
  54. Does your phone camera detect enemy tanks at night from 20 miles away?
    1
  55. Those pilots were debunked by a USAF crew chief. He actually knows how the pods work and called out Fravor for not "remembering" (aka lying) about the contrast setting.
    1
  56. The footage. The pods see things our eyes can't.
    1
  57. Who is this expert engineer? If he is who I think he is, he's already been countered.
    1
  58.  @xoferwalken  Mick West does not have to be an expert in ATFLIR. He has already proven with demonstrations that the effect shown is mirror rotation.
    1
  59.  @xoferwalken  Equipment specialists have backed Mick West.
    1
  60.  @Jacmac1  And Mick West did a response video: /watch?v=FG49Tpb_los Chris Lehto noticed the flaw in Dave Falch's argument. And even in Dave Falch's videos the commenters are pointing out how his footage proves Mick West right.
    1
  61. Probably. It's where the sensors would be.
    1
  62. He's right.
    1
  63. The white glow is a contrast aid. A USAF crew chief (they are certified to seat on the cockpit and use the systems) confirmed that there's a setting on the targeting pod to activate and deactivate that "glow" outline.
    1
  64. ​ @forty27  By Oliver Stone, friend of Hugo Chavez and Putin, and whose son worked for Russia Today.
    1
  65. There was no coup, the governmeng was in session in 2014.
    1
  66. UAPs have always been acknowledged. Hence the term.
    1
  67. ​ @mariahcarey9470  What do you mean? Russia invaded. War isn't worth anything but Russia brought it to them.
    1
  68. There were WMDs in Iraq. US troops that found them became ill from neurological damage from exposure to Sarin.
    1
  69. Chris Lehto did a poor job.
    1
  70. Why? The US didn't invade Ukraine.
    1
  71. An 85 year old schizo published something on Substack. Wow.
    1
  72. They are viewing things outside of the visible spectrum that normal cameras can't see, and from dozens of miles away. Also, the military always blurs footage to mask their true capability. Remember when Trump tweeted a cellphone photo of satellite imagery? It was not blurred, so it exposed the US satellite capabilities - the photo was crisp enough to see individual steps and hand rails in the stairs outside a military prefab.
    1
  73. They died because of other Iraqis. Sectarian violence was the prime killer, not the war.
    1
  74.  @Sammich4839  Sectarian violence wouldn't have started without the Ba'ath party losers promoting it as a way to get back at the US.
    1
  75. NATO was already on Russia's border in the Baltic states.
    1
  76. North Korea doesn't need WMDs because their mutual assured destruction is leveling Seoul with conventional artillery. North Korea has a knife on South Korea's throat without even needing nukes.
    1
  77. His domestic support is entirely manufactured by government agencies. And many people say they support Putin to get out of trouble anyway.
    1
  78. You can't get better cameras. These are state of the art.
    1
  79. Shut up, Botski. The US didn't invade Ukraine.
    1
  80.  @mattgarcia440  Image is stabilized by rotating mirror, which keeps the horizon stable. "Object" is a smear (like astigmatism) which rotates due to stabilization.
    1
  81.  @williamprosser7637  No.
    1
  82.  @YoYoYoYoYoYoPeace  They didn't debunk anything. Mick West has proven himself right with his demonstrations and a USAF crew chief confirmed the inner workings of the FLIR pod.
    1
  83.  @YoYoYoYoYoYoPeace  Military rank doesn't mean anything regarding physics and optics. Radar evidence was never presented, the claims are about video footage. Stay on topic.
    1
  84.  @Screzzex  the FLIR pod shows nothing out of the ordinary
    1
  85.  @angelgjr1999  That's not how it works. We spend MILLIONS to see the invisible with neat machines that augment our capabilities, but they're still flawed. Red eyes in camera photos is not a sign of demonic posession, but tech having limits.
    1
  86.  @InTimeTraveller  They were carrying RPGs. The Apache gunner was defending a US convoy from incoming fire.
    1
  87.  @nitehawk-cg6jb  How did the pilot know it stood still? Optical illusions are a thing.
    1
  88.  @InTimeTraveller  Yeah, Wikileaks made their name off flawed reporting. If you actually look it up the men are armed. Photos of the scene taken after US troops arrived show the weapons.
    1
  89. She was right, smart girl.
    1
  90. Elizondo is a UFO nutter so he's already a biased source.
    1
  91. Hundred yards? These things are miles away. FLIR pods have zoom function.
    1
  92. Not true, the US is the only country were things are routinely declassified.
    1
  93. Didn't happen. The pod lost track and just stared into the distance. This makes the object appear to accelerate but no - the camera stopped moving.
    1
  94. Disprove Mick West, then.
    1
  95. Military forces rarely disclose anything. The US is somewhat unique in the way there's a strong civilian oversight over what the military is doing. However I think Chile declassified UAP footage recorded in a naval helicopter.
    1
  96. Putin literally tried to win the war by freezing civilians in the winter. Can't win the war with the military so he tried to use terrorism.
    1
  97. Because high def cameras help you see black heads on someone's skin from a few feet away, but do jack squat about picking up objects tens of miles away. These sensors are made for warfare, not netflix shows.
    1
  98. The US used drones in WW2.
    1
  99. Copium
    1
  100.  @J_X999  Improved childcare doesn't matter. People want to go to college and have good jobs. They want to buy houses. Kids get in the way of that. Unless China promotes people sticking to a highschool diploma and getting less demanding jobs so they can raise children, the childcare doesn't matter. The childcare is just one of the parts of raising a child.
    1
  101.  @J_X999  People are not having children because they already have trouble getting a good job out of getting out of college at 23/24/25 and affording a house. People are not having children because dating and social connections are becoming harder. If everything else was solved, childcare wouldn't be a problem. You know what childcare was when I was a kid? My parents dropped me off at my grandparents' home. I was looked after for free.
    1
  102.  @J_X999  Cope. The vast majority of people my age are just struggling in the housing department. Forget about affording the things listed after the child. People have trouble affording those BEFORE the child.
    1
  103. Bob is a proven liar.
    1
  104.  @truthsayer9534  He is. He forged his documents and made errors that expose him.
    1
  105. Cope Botski
    1
  106. Take a decent camera. Now try to film something 10 miles away. It's a blurry mess.
    1
  107. It was provoked. Saddam kept breaking the peace terms for the entirety of the 90s.
    1