Comments by "Titanium Rain" (@ChucksSEADnDEAD) on "Military Whistleblower: US has Captured UFOs!!!!: BUSTED!" video.

  1. He may think space is like Game of Thrones but personally I think it's more like Sopranos.
    5
  2. I woke up in the slums of Tatooine once, found my speeder standing on bricks. They took the anti-gravity drive.
    2
  3. Targeting pods are like a million bucks and take up a weapons hardpoint.
    2
  4.  @10100rsn  So aircraft would be wasting fuel (extra weight and drag) to bring a secondary pod that adds another 1 million to the price of an aircraft? Just because of some balloons and birds?
    2
  5. They don't clearly show anything of the sort.
    2
  6. Because laser glasses are rated for specific wavelengths (ranging from visible to infrared) while arc welding emits UV radiation. A laser that goes into your eye will be focused on the retina and damage phototeceptors, arc welding will cause a "sunburn" in your cornea.
    2
  7. Same as Nordstream, several countries have evidence of who placed the bombs but nobody wants to come out and expose their underwater surveillance means. It's not what they saw, it's how saying what they saw will allow enemies to work in reverse and figure out the true capabilities.
    1
  8. The uncrewed probes have pilot bodies in them?
    1
  9. Because media is garbage and depends on clicks and views. Welcome to the real world. Wear a cup.
    1
  10. I mean the Ukrainians have massive kill compilations if you want to check where the money is going. I've seen like 6 videos of Russian soldiers offing themselves after being wounded so far.
    1
  11. Were they in the tic tac encounter?
    1
  12. ​ @TheSilvantor  by the end of 2024? Mark it on your phone's calendar and bookmark this link
    1
  13. To be fair they were British, the pilots were just in a revolutionary war mindset.
    1
  14. What does an Attorney General know about aerospace?
    1
  15. Fraver has been caught either lying or not understanding how his targeting systems worked. It's hilarious how you people bring up Fraver/Fravor/whatever still thinking he isn't a perfect trap card. You bring him up, I already know you haven't seen his claims being demolished.
    1
  16. Can an iPhone see a Russian T90 scratch that a T-55, from 30 kilometers away at night and put a laser spot on it so that you can score a direct hit with a 500lb bomb? iPhones are great at taking pretty pictures. They're not gonna help at tracking ducks.
    1
  17. The US government? It's the media and a few nutters.
    1
  18. ​ @Czeckie  It boggles the mind how Manning and Assange got clout off Collateral Murder, a video where an Apache gunner correctly identified the threat and shot the "innocent journalists" filming the wartime equivalent of snuff during an ambush targeting US servicemen. The AKs and RPGs found on scene meant nothing.
    1
  19. Jack Teixeira had a top secret clearence and he mishandled documentation.
    1
  20. ​ @-Zevin-  Is it a disaster? Seems similar to Kherson. First Russians claim to be winning... then it's every man for himself as they run away with Ukrainians hot on their tails.
    1
  21. There's too much text to reply to everything but the counters are useless. Bokeh is confirmed, the hot/cold stuff is related to emissivity, the "other sensors" are conviniently not available, etc etc etc. I could take a more serious look but I'm on mobile, the counters are pathetic attempts at staying relevant and Mick West has handled everything thrown at him.
    1
  22.  @Astrologon  Several videos were made regarding the derotation mechanism trying to prove Mick West wrong, then actual USAF maintenance personnel and the patents themselves confirmed what he was saying. The reality is that people will twist themselves into pretzels trying to counter Mick West but the man goes back to basics. His system is just paying dividends while others try to get into the weeds and end up looking foolish. The "critics" usually just recycle the material. I had to stop paying attention at some point, if there's new arguments they can be checked out but people in comments are still trying to argue points that Mick already addressed. Ad Hominem is saying someone can't be trusted because of who they are, attacking the person rather than the argument. I just resorted to plain old namecalling. That's not a fallacy or argumentative tactic, that's just me calling it like it is. People aren't presenting the evidence of UFOs. People are trying to argue against the actual freaking patents filed by the company and the people who disassemble the targeting pods for a living. I'd call that pathetic. Forget the UFOs, people are online trying to convince me the sky is purple. We can debate the UFOs, but still trying to double down on lies is just insanity.
    1
  23. ​ @GulfbeachMateo  How is that an argument? Seeing an object with your eyes does not change the focus capabilities of a lens.
    1
  24.  @GulfbeachMateo  Already did. You didn't answer the question. You presented an invalid argument so again - what do the eyes have to do with lenses?
    1
  25. The establishment media is parroting the claims Thunderf00t is debunking. Think before posting.
    1
  26.  @TheBushdoctor68  He has debunked several aspects of the claims made. The eye witness reports are being dismissed because the EVIDENCE presented doesn't match the claims made. Trustworthy observers? Who determined their trustworthiness? The establishment media is uncritically parroting claims instead of actually investigating.
    1
  27. ​ @GulfbeachMateo  And pilots do die. You know how people get their bearings? By looking at things they know. You look at something you've never seen, you have no frame of reference. You look at a control tower, you know roughly how many miles you are away from the runway. You look at a balloon, which is just a grey blob or a light spot if it's reflecting the sun? You have no idea about its size or distance. Want to not die flying an aircraft? Look at the control towers, hangars, the coastline, etc. Not blobs. You do not know anything about they, you will crash your aircraft trying to use them as a reference.
    1
  28. Appeal to authority. You wanna tal about alien pilot corpses, you bring the evidence. I don't care if you're the Queen of freaking England brought back to life, no job title prevents people from being crazy or telling lies.
    1
  29. His arrogance is earned. When some guy goes "NUH UH I FLEW DA PLANE" and his instruments can outright tell you it was an object flying at wind speed, you earn the right to be arrogant.
    1
  30. A ton of black projects were eventually revealed. Most stuff never leaves the paper or only has mock ups built. The truly remarkae stuff is talked about openly, like the SR-71 and the fact that the CIA had a higher performance variant.
    1
  31. What if they exist but at the same time Jesus confirms they never visited us? What about that?
    1
  32. Other countries don't have FOIA equivalents so the military just keeps the footage.
    1
  33. ​ @-Zevin-  Source? You do remember how the Azeris lost 50 tanks and the Armenians mocked them online... then the Azeris broke through. The Armenians weren't laughing no more. Losing a handful of Leopards (some of which were recovered already) is peanuts.
    1
  34. ​ @-Zevin-  The Vikhrs took out a bunch of John Deere farm equipment too!
    1
  35. ​ @alienzenx  the story is bunk because there's no evidence, the total humiliation of the nutjobs who point at blurry video is just the cherry on top
    1
  36. This story comes out every year during the summer. The offensive is doing better than Kherson, and Kherson was a decisive Ukrainian victory.
    1
  37. Nothing will unfold. How many times has this song and dance happened?
    1
  38. The War of the World broadcast scare is exagerated. Very few people believed it.
    1
  39. Roswell was a nuclear blast detection system that could pick up the shockwave halfway across the world. When it crashed the government secretly pushed the UFO story to prevent the Soviets from figuring out the US could spy on their nuclear tests.
    1