Comments by "Titanium Rain" (@ChucksSEADnDEAD) on "" video.

Russia is whining.
12
And the CSTO isn't a collective, doesn't provide security and it's not organized.
5
S-500s are anti-ballistic systems that carry over features from previous launchers, they're not S-400 + 100.
4
"NATO is not designed to fight a trench war" armored bulldozers going BRRRRRT in the background
4
It would probably take longer to write down the training program than putting a batch of pilots through it.
3
First we need airworthy airframes that could be sent, we worry about Putin's mind later.
3
Mark France with the daily Ru MoD cope.
3
Lie. Russia's figures are artificially low due to purchasing power parity. Their budget is equivalent to 220 billion USD and that's peacetime - they most likely tripled ir quadrupled that number this year.
2
@andybing4974 cope. The Russian army is pushing daisies and all they have now are civilians and prisoners.
2
@pickititllneverheal9016 Budapest Memorandum. Ukraine traded their nukes away for security. Want to owe them nothing? Give them nukes.
1
@pickititllneverheal9016 Thought so. A deal is a deal, if we're not giving them back the nukes then we have the responsibility to help.
1
@pickititllneverheal9016 I can assure you that if you looked over the years, that hundred mil has been spent already. It's like the Unicef situation or whatever. They said X amount of billion would solve world hunger to shame Elon Musk. He pressed them and they came back saying it would HELP solve hunger. Because they've had that money already. So no matter how much money you give them, it only "helps", even though they start off by saying that if you give them X money they'll solve it. How do you make people who want to do drugs get jobs and remain housed with that hundred mil? Intensive psychiatric therapy?
1
Why? There's literally no benefit.
1
@I_0..0_I Not worth having a war over that. Seems like a net drain in resources.
1
They have opposition parties. We advocate for peace - on the victim's terms. Not the terms of the murderer.
1
They already won the war. Russia is a criminal on drugs with a bullet lodged in the heart. The cops already dealt the fatal blow, but Russia is still swining the knife due to adrenaline.
1
You're gonna close the borders with HIMARS, big guy? You're gonna massace civilians? Border security has nothing to do with advanced wepons.
1
Russia provoked the war. Ukrainians died in the streets for the privilege of joining the EU, gunned down by the Russian-trained units working under Yanukovych's orders. They're our brothers.
1
@honeybee8856 How is NATO a threat? Why isn't Russia an imminent threat to the Baltics, Ukraine, Georgia, Finland, etc? Or Kazakhstan, the Russian talking heads made small threats of invasion on TV. There was no such promise. First, it was with the Soviet Union. Second, it was regarding the POLISH border with East Germany. Not the Soviet border in modern Belarus. Oh, so a robber warns you that he's going to kill you. That doesn't make it legal. He's still an evil man. And when the police arrives, they'll open fire on him.
1
A naval war won't use land war supplies.
1
@randyhavard6084 Okay. And Taiwan will reply in kind, causing crippling damage to China. If it gets to a shooting war Taiwan's main priority is to make sure that China goes down with them, and cause irrecoverable damage. There would be no landing. Too much hassle, too much death. Just kneecap the country.
1
The war ends tomorrow. Russia only has to pull out.
1
Russia has no business in Ukraine.
1
Cope. Castro wanted to use the nukes and Khruschev eventually came around to agreeing he was a loose cannon. The US and the USSR solved it with diplomacy. Russia just starts killing
1
@enekoalvarez1401 It's not the same. Cuba having missiles that Castro wanted under his control was a nuclear threat. Ukraine in NATO just means they're well defended.
1
You probably don't pay taxes so why do you care?
1
Cope. The history is indeed complex - studying it would reveal how important it is to stop Russia.
1