Comments by "Titanium Rain" (@ChucksSEADnDEAD) on "Alex Jones - Cell Towers Are Used For Mind Control!! | Joe Rogan" video.

There's no actual evidence that says 5G is any different from what we already use. It's non-ionizing radiation so there's no DNA breaks and the power output of the devices is limited so it will not heat up tissues.
16
@richardbianco3193 you do realize that it's nowhere close to xray or gamma, right? You have radio, microwave, IR, visible light, UV, xray and gamma from longer to shorter.
2
@D Adams which one LMAO
1
@JizzyDipper yeah, I know how phasing works. I suppose you're talking about how an array can use phase cancellation to direct a beam. What about it?
1
Shawn Michael are you gonna have a fucking tower mounted on your house?
1
@pluto8404 1. Why would a standing wave form inside the body? 2. Why would a standing wave change the wavelenght of the radiation? By your logic its actually more likely for the frequency to shift towards visible light rather than jumping the visible spectrum and going towards UV or xrays. So unless people start glowing spontaneously after 5G installation, I am pretty sure you don't need to worry about your DNA.
1
@pluto8404 I hope you got the AC on, because apparently sitting on a warm room is gonna break the water molecules. Jesus Christ do we fart oxygen and hydrogen when the water molecules break while we stand in the heat? You should probably get your scientific research published because you're onto something nobody else knows.
1
@pluto8404 I'm not stretching anything, your ideas make no goddamn sense. Taking a magnifying glass simply gathers energy from a certain area and concentrates it over a focal point. That's why the magnifying glass "casts a shadow" underneath. The energy is already being bombarded all over your body but you can take it and there's no "standing wave". You have to physically displace the thermal energy into a focal point for it to cause damage. So why would non-ionizing radiation all over your body be concentrated into a "focal point"? Why would it form a "standing wave"? Why would a standing wave cause a thermal runaway? "-Is this enough to break up a DNA strand? I dont know. " - YOU DON'T KNOW, exactly. "-Is it theoretically possible? Yes." - you have a fucked up definition of what theoretically possible is. You actually have to lay out the theory and prove with maths that 5G is gonna cook your DNA. Not just say "it's possible". Where's the theoretical part? Your calculations? By that logic I can say it's theoretically possible for a pink elephant to fall on your head right now. Where is the science behind it? Don't care. I'll just post it on youtube and say it's possible!
1
Shawn Michael you have no argument so you resort to insults, thanks for admitting defeat.
1
@pluto8404 1. You made the claim, the burden of evidence is on you. 2. The maths to prove it are easy. The Einstein-Plank equation gives that E =hf, just multiply the frequency of 5G for the Planck constant. Ionization of water requires 12.621 eV from what I researched, bu let's just assume the energy of UV radiation as a threshold for biological damage, 3.9 eV. The lower frequency of 5G is 28 GHz, using the E = hf equation and converting the value in joule for electronvolt it gives me 1.16 x 10^-4 eV. That's 0.000116 eV. 3. "Microwaves are tuned to interact with water molecules" - to heat it up! Not cause chemical changes to the molecule! Jesus!
1
@JizzyDipper okay, but increasing wattage does not actually change the energy carried by the radiation meaning that while power is greater, each individual particle does not get more energy so it can ionize molecules.
1
@JizzyDipper just say it outright instead of using weasel words. What is the "wrong" frequency? By bandwidth do you mean the max simultaneous data transfer rate or did you confuse it with wavelength? Say what you mean and stop wasting time.
1
@sivrahc of course they're powerful, radiation loses power according to the inverse square law. For it to be able to reach long distances, it has to have enough power that it is dangerous to stand in front of the emitter at very close range. But the power dissipates quickly.
1