Comments by "Titanium Rain" (@ChucksSEADnDEAD) on "Ju0026J says data supports boosting single-shot Covid-19 vaccine" video.

@armaan1091 If you have cancer, your risk is much greater because of how therapies affect the immune system. The individual risk is more than made up by the benefits if it works. For the populace in general, giving out millions of shots is handing out empty revolvers for everyone to play with, and some are loaded. After a million people pull the trigger, someone is bound to get a loaded chamber. And for what? For many people the risk of taking the shot is about the same as getting the sickness, and the benefits are dubious. Depending on age group and variant, the shot can be as low as 42%. In Israel, for my age group and against Delta, it was only 3% effective. That's riddiculous. It's a faulty product. They measured effectiveness by symptom suppression in trials, when most people are naturally assymptomatic. How does this make sense?
3
@armaan1091 If it's free how are they not bankrupt?
2
They all are, they just affect different demographics differently.
1
@Shackofcinnamon "back account"
1
@lampini I don't have to show proof of flu shot.
1
@lampini Also, another difference: the flu shot is different every year because they're trying to predict the most common strains. This is just a faulty product.
1
@lampini No, it's just going to restart antibody production because of fading immunity. It's like taking last year's flu shot. It might work or it might not depending on which strains are active. You're simply gambling. They didn't start the process from scratch, it would be an ordeal compared to just getting approval for a second/third shot.
1
@lampini No, they're not. You're gonna get what's sitting on the shelves. Same as Pfeizer, they got the Cominarty or whatever but the biontech is still getting an extension so people will keep getting those until they run out.
1