Comments by "Titanium Rain" (@ChucksSEADnDEAD) on "Ukraine Shoots Down Russia's "Unstoppable" Kinzhal Missiles || Peter Zeihan" video.

"Highly manueverable" while hypersonic means having a turn radius the size of a state.
36
It wasn't defended as Russians are now targeting depots with rocket fuel for nuclear missiles Ukraine hasn't had since 1994.
2
September 2022 a Khinzal crashed in Russian territory, it had the exact same wreckage.
1
@joshuapaul2022 You're afraid of looking it up. Stavropol 2022 Khinzal crash. Google it. Look at the eyelets in the warhead. Same one.
1
The DF-17 with DF-ZF is a lot similar to the Pershing II. Pershing II reentry vehicles were used to cap Storm II test targets for Patriots in the late 90s.
1
Look for the Khinzal crash from 2022. Inside Russia, so it wasn't an Ukrainian set up. Exact same warhead Klitschko was holding. On the ground. Inside Russia. Embarassing.
1
If you run at a wall, the wall is 0km/h but stops you.
1
Because it requires a nuclear weapon?
1
Klitschko filmed a video with the wreckage. There's also a piece of missile that fell near a bus stop that looks exactly like a Khinzal fairing.
1
In the late 90s Patriots shot down Storm II targets. Storm IIs were missiles with discarded Pershing II reentry vehicles on top, to simulate a maneuverable hypersonic target. "Dated" 20 year old PAC-2 Patriots could shoot down these test targets in 1995-1997.
1
If someone starts running at me and I lift my foot, it's like I kicked them in the face even though I didn't move an inch.
1
Soviet era rocket fuel. It was public knowledge those stores were there, with even news articles complaining about the danger of that fuel being stored without plans to decomission it. Russia knew about those depots and hit them to cause big bangs to satisfy the ultranationalists after 4 aircraft were shot down inside Russia.
1
Hypersonics maneuvering also can't maneuver too hard or else their outrageous velocity will cause hundreds of G's to be pulled and shred the entire structure.
1
It got destroyed? Can we see it?
1
Taking a hit? Surely there's pictures of the wrecked system, right? And did they hit the radar or a launcher? The launchers can be 10km away from the command module.
1
The wreckage photos were published. If I make a fist while stopped and you run face first into my hand, you'll get punched. Your velocity works in my favor.
1
There's video of it being destroyed? Where?
1
People are shooting their mouth about weapons which don't exist. Ever seen a Tsirkon? I haven't. The Chinese DF-ZF? It's a glide reentry vehicle, not air breathing. Ironically, the US makes public their trials with scramjet hypersonics and admits failures.
1
It wasn't lol if it were why isn't Russian sending more missiles right now?
1
It was a Khinzal, and a wall will stop you even though it's stationary. Don't believe me? Run full sprint at a wall, head first. Report back after you try it.
1
@pasquinomarforio Because that's a warhead. Warhead has to fit INSIDE the missile. You understand that, right? You can't fit something bigger inside something smaller. The wreckage is consistent with the Stavropol 2022 crash.
1
@pasquinomarforio Nobody mentioned any sabots. Learn to read. No spin. Google "kinzhal crash Stavropol". Do it. Bet you won't, because you're afraid.
1
It is. Look for the September 2022 Khinzal crash inside Russian territory. It has the exact sake warhead.
1
@RK-yu7mp So it was a Khinzal. What over delivery system could do it?
1
@RK-yu7mp Doesn't matter, we know that Russia chimped out and fired 6 more Khinzals. That's proof that one got shot down and they needed a win to compensate for that humiliation.
1
@fwfeo Russia also had tank advantage and still got shredded. Advantages are like dick size - knowing how to use it is what matters. Russia squanders its advantage by bombarding empty fields, even Russian soldiers complain about the ammo wasted.
1