Comments by "Titanium Rain" (@ChucksSEADnDEAD) on "SomeOrdinaryGamers" channel.

  1. 106
  2. 100
  3. 87
  4. 78
  5. 74
  6. 66
  7. 61
  8. 56
  9. 52
  10. 41
  11. 41
  12. 38
  13. 37
  14. 37
  15. 37
  16. 36
  17. 36
  18. 32
  19. 30
  20. 26
  21. 25
  22. 25
  23. 24
  24. 23
  25. 22
  26. 22
  27. 22
  28. 22
  29. 22
  30. 21
  31. 21
  32. 20
  33. 20
  34. 20
  35. 18
  36. 18
  37. 16
  38. 16
  39. 16
  40. 15
  41. 15
  42. 15
  43. 14
  44. 14
  45. 14
  46. 14
  47. 13
  48. 13
  49. 13
  50. 13
  51. 13
  52. 12
  53. 12
  54. 12
  55. 12
  56. 12
  57. 11
  58. 11
  59. 11
  60. 11
  61. 11
  62. 10
  63. 10
  64. 10
  65. 10
  66. 10
  67. 9
  68. 9
  69. 9
  70. 9
  71. 9
  72. 8
  73. 8
  74. 8
  75. 8
  76. 8
  77. 8
  78. 8
  79. 8
  80. 8
  81. 8
  82. 8
  83. 8
  84. 8
  85. 7
  86. 7
  87. 7
  88. 7
  89. 7
  90. 7
  91. 7
  92. 7
  93. 7
  94. 7
  95. 7
  96. 6
  97. 6
  98. 6
  99. 6
  100. 6
  101. 6
  102. 6
  103. 6
  104. 6
  105. 6
  106. 6
  107. 6
  108. 6
  109. 6
  110. 5
  111. 5
  112. 5
  113. 5
  114. 5
  115. 5
  116. 5
  117. 5
  118. 5
  119. 5
  120. 5
  121. 5
  122. 5
  123. 5
  124. 5
  125. 5
  126. 5
  127. 5
  128. 5
  129. 5
  130. 5
  131. 5
  132. 4
  133. 4
  134. 4
  135. 4
  136. 4
  137. 4
  138. 4
  139. 4
  140. 4
  141. 4
  142. 4
  143. 4
  144. 4
  145. 4
  146. 4
  147. 4
  148. 4
  149.  @calenhoover1124  "Do you know the insane requirements to devolve into tyranny here in the U.S?" - They're not insane at all. "If the balance of power has been so heavily subverted as you've said, republicans and/or democrats wouldn't have issues getting laws passed" - the fact that there's different corporate interests fighting over differences doesn't mean anything. They have no issue getting laws passed whenever it's about fucking you over. They call that "bipartisanship". "Do you honestly think they would ever relinquish their own power to bestow all of it upon a tyrant?" - Who said anything about relinquishing anything? They're happy to share. "there's a reason that tyranny almost always evolves into a democracy," - What? Please name all the tyrannical regimes that "evolved" naturally without coups or revolutions. "the reason we havent completely repealed the patriot act(even though parts of the patriot act did expire at the end of 2019) is because of the balance of power(duh)" - You said democracy would save us, turns out it can't. Take the L. Also, the government retaining excessive power is somehow reflection of a "balance", that's a big brained take. "that debate has been going on in government since it was passed" - According to you democracy would solve it. Solve it. "same reason we wont devolve into tyranny." - So the government gives itself power and is unwilling to get rid of it. The power it amasses continues growing because there's an institutionalized inertia to giving up power. Somehow this isn't gonna devolve into tyranny even though the democratic process is unable to contain it.
    4
  150. 4
  151. 4
  152. 4
  153. 4
  154. 4
  155. 4
  156. 4
  157. 4
  158. 4
  159. 4
  160. 4
  161. 4
  162. 4
  163. 3
  164. 3
  165. 3
  166. 3
  167. 3
  168. 3
  169. 3
  170. 3
  171. 3
  172. 3
  173. 3
  174. 3
  175. 3
  176. 3
  177. 3
  178. 3
  179. 3
  180. 3
  181. 3
  182. 3
  183. 3
  184. 3
  185. 3
  186. 3
  187. 3
  188. 3
  189. 3
  190. 3
  191. 3
  192. 3
  193. 3
  194. 3
  195. 3
  196. 3
  197. 3
  198. 3
  199. 3
  200. 3
  201. 3
  202. 3
  203. 3
  204. 3
  205. 3
  206. 3
  207. 3
  208. 3
  209. 3
  210. 3
  211. 3
  212. 3
  213.  @MisterN1  "which technically they do all the time as a part of the aging process in which cells replicate and each replication makes new cells weaker than the previous though not always" - No. There are thermal and non-thermal effects in vitro to millimeter wave radiation. What does this mean? The studies say it's not clear. "5G does not magically transform a living substance into a bunch of RNA encased in a fatty lipid layer with proteins sticking out of it(that would be a virus)" - I've clearly never mentioned a virus. I was just saying the entire 5G conspiracy theory goes deeper than that. "Cancer cells are made by radiation" - No, cancer cells can be made by literally anything. Even exposure to asbestos is dangerous because not only getting the fibers stuck on your lung tissue causes the cells to react to the foreign object, but the fibers themselves are thin enough to tangle chromosomes and physically change the DNA inside a cell. Exposure to certain chemicals causes these changes which are responsible for cancer. "I could see the argument for 5g causing cancer were it not for the issue of cellphone radiation and even 5G radiation being non-ionizing radiation" - I literally explained why the "ionizing vs non-ionizing" argument doesn't work. "Sorry man but you're not winning me over on any of this." - I'm not winning ANYTHING. I'm literally trying to explain you how to talk to the people who believe in the conspiracy. You can't flippantly dismiss non-ionizing radiation when the issue is cells having their DNA affected by means other than ionizing radiation.
    3
  214. 3
  215. 3
  216. 3
  217. 3
  218. 3
  219. 3
  220. 3
  221. 3
  222. 3
  223. 2
  224. 2
  225. 2
  226. 2
  227. 2
  228. 2
  229. 2
  230. 2
  231. 2
  232. 2
  233. 2
  234. 2
  235. 2
  236. 2
  237. 2
  238. 2
  239. 2
  240. 2
  241. 2
  242. 2
  243. 2
  244. 2
  245. 2
  246. 2
  247. 2
  248. 2
  249. 2
  250. 2
  251. 2
  252. 2
  253. 2
  254. 2
  255. 2
  256. 2
  257. 2
  258. 2
  259. 2
  260. 2
  261. 2
  262. 2
  263. 2
  264. 2
  265. 2
  266. 2
  267. 2
  268. 2
  269. 2
  270. 2
  271. 2
  272. 2
  273. 2
  274. 2
  275. 2
  276. 2
  277. 2
  278. 2
  279. 2
  280. 2
  281. 2
  282. 2
  283. 2
  284. 2
  285. 2
  286. 2
  287. 2
  288. 2
  289. 2
  290. 2
  291. 2
  292. 2
  293. 2
  294. 2
  295. 2
  296. 2
  297. 2
  298. 2
  299. 2
  300. 2
  301. 2
  302. 2
  303. 2
  304. 2
  305. 2
  306. 2
  307. 2
  308. 2
  309. 2
  310. 2
  311. 2
  312. 2
  313.  @calenhoover1124  "Your issue is that you think free communication means completely and utterly unchecked, and unregulated" - You don't get to pretend you know what I think. "This will change absolutely nothing about your life." - It does because I use a end-to-end encrypted chat platform and this law might expose some people I work with to their country's authorities. "This aint 1984 bud, and like every other industry in this country our democratic process will decide" - Dude, the democratic process hasn't done shit. "if it ends up being a catastrophic failure, they can repeal it" - Name a law comparable to this that got repealed by democratic means. "Nice anecdote there, but plenty and plenty of bipartisan bills are actually to promote social and civil welfare, not just to "fuck you over"" - Here's the secret: they don't actually promote social or civil welfare. "The issue is, is that a lot of people don't think its a problem" - Then you just admitted that democracy doesn't work because most people don't pay attention. Take the L. "Sorry thats just not how democracy works. Democracy isnt what you think is best, its what the collective deems to be best, and sometimes having a collective agree on something so controversial is hard and takes effort and time." - It's been almost two decades since the state started restricting freedoms in the name of fighting terrorism. We gave it time. We gave it effort. Obama was essentially elected to reverse the Bush-era measures and he simply signed every extension to those laws. When people were mad at Bush they voted to change things around, and when things didn't change the narrative was twisted. "It sounds like youd prefer a monarchy" - Nice strawman. When you do this, it's just an admission that you're losing. "So are you suggesting they are gonna rip up the constitution that strictly limits the powers the governmetn has over civilian rights" - That's the issue bucko, they don't need to. Look at the Second Amendment - it says that the right to keep and bear arms cannot be infringed. What does infringed mean? Broken, limited or undermined. Supposedly, the government cannot do ANYTHING that undermines gun ownership. But there's gun laws. Supposedly, the government cannot break the Fourth Amendment. But they do. Hell, it could be argued that with police militarization the government is even breaking the amendment everyone forgets about, the Third. The government wipes it's ass with the constitution, but because it puts it back in a display case with skid marks you think everything's fine because they're not actually tearing it into pieces. "Because an election and elected officials would mean its inherently not a tyranny" - You do realize that there were tyrannical states that held elections, right? "Most militaries, made up of working class soldiers will eventually if not immediately rebel against a tyrannical government thats hurting the people." - Then explain China or North Korea. Why haven't their military forces risen up against the government?
    2
  314. 2
  315. 2
  316. 2
  317. 2
  318. 2
  319. 2
  320. 2
  321. 2
  322. 2
  323. 2
  324. 2
  325. 2
  326. 2
  327. 2
  328. 2
  329. 2
  330. 2
  331. 2
  332. 2
  333. 2
  334. 2
  335. 2
  336. 2
  337. 2
  338. 2
  339. 2
  340. 2
  341. 2
  342. 2
  343. 2
  344. 2
  345. 2
  346. 2
  347. 2
  348. 2
  349. 2
  350. 2
  351. 2
  352. 2
  353. 1
  354. 1
  355. 1
  356. 1
  357. 1
  358. 1
  359. 1
  360. 1
  361. 1
  362. 1
  363. 1
  364. 1
  365. 1
  366. 1
  367. 1
  368. 1
  369. 1
  370. 1
  371. 1
  372. 1
  373. 1
  374. 1
  375. 1
  376. 1
  377. 1
  378. 1
  379. 1
  380. 1
  381. 1
  382. 1
  383. 1
  384. 1
  385. 1
  386. 1
  387. 1
  388. 1
  389. 1
  390. 1
  391. 1
  392. 1
  393. 1
  394. 1
  395. 1
  396. 1
  397. 1
  398.  @Mr.N0B0DY.3D  1. It's propaganda because it's acted and scripted and you can tell. 2. We don't know much about life there, but the fact that we don't know only helps my case. If life in NK is so walled off, why are people freely posting content for outsiders? Think a little. You yourself are saying that we don't know shit. So we now suddenly know shit? 2 + 2 dawg. It's 4. It's government approved. 3. It's not about people living okay but the propaganda itself. It's the second time you try to derail the argument like this. 4. The Soviet Union also had airports and power stations. They were also not free countries and they used propaganda to pretend they were better off than they were. 5. The difference is that you're allowed to make videos in South Africa. If South Africa heavily restricted outbound content and then suddenly you started posting videos, I'd assume you had government permission to release them. 6. We have not forced isolation, sanctions don't work like that. First you say North Korea has airports and power stations, now you claim they're cut off. They have the technology to post on tiktok. But not the freedom to do it. They're cut off because they want to control the dissemination of information. Both inbound and outbound. I don't need to trust any "developed nation" propaganda. I only need to look at NK - they had the absolute freedom to decide to come clean about everything, ask for help and sanctions relief, etc. What do they do? Build nukes and restrict information out of the country.
    1
  399. 1
  400. 1
  401. 1
  402. 1
  403. 1
  404. 1
  405. 1
  406. 1
  407. 1
  408. 1
  409. 1
  410. 1
  411. 1
  412. 1
  413. 1
  414. 1
  415. 1
  416. 1
  417. 1
  418. 1
  419. 1
  420. 1
  421. 1
  422. 1
  423. 1
  424. 1
  425. 1
  426. 1
  427. 1
  428. 1
  429. 1
  430. 1
  431. 1
  432. 1
  433. 1
  434. 1
  435. 1
  436. 1
  437. 1
  438. 1
  439. 1
  440. 1
  441. 1
  442. 1
  443. 1
  444. 1
  445. 1
  446. 1
  447. 1
  448. 1
  449. 1
  450. 1
  451. 1
  452. 1
  453. 1
  454. 1
  455. 1
  456. 1
  457. 1
  458. 1
  459. 1
  460. 1
  461. 1
  462. 1
  463. 1
  464. 1
  465. 1
  466. 1
  467. 1
  468. 1
  469. 1
  470. 1
  471. 1
  472. 1
  473. 1
  474. 1
  475. 1
  476. 1
  477. 1
  478. 1
  479. 1
  480. 1
  481. 1
  482. 1
  483. 1
  484. 1
  485. 1
  486. 1
  487. 1
  488. 1
  489. 1
  490. 1
  491. 1
  492. 1
  493. 1
  494. 1
  495. 1
  496. 1
  497. 1
  498. 1
  499. 1
  500. 1
  501. 1
  502. 1
  503. 1
  504. 1
  505. 1
  506. 1
  507. 1
  508. 1
  509. 1
  510. 1
  511. 1
  512. 1
  513. 1
  514. 1
  515. 1
  516. 1
  517. 1
  518. 1
  519. 1
  520. 1
  521. 1
  522. 1
  523. 1
  524. 1
  525. 1
  526. 1
  527. 1
  528. 1
  529. 1
  530. 1
  531. 1
  532. 1
  533. 1
  534. 1
  535. 1
  536. 1
  537. 1
  538. 1
  539. 1
  540. 1
  541. 1
  542. 1
  543. 1
  544. 1
  545. 1
  546. 1
  547. 1
  548. 1
  549. 1
  550. 1
  551. 1
  552. 1
  553. 1
  554. 1
  555. 1
  556. 1
  557. 1
  558. 1
  559. 1
  560. 1
  561. 1
  562. 1
  563. 1
  564. 1
  565. 1
  566. 1
  567. 1
  568. 1
  569. 1
  570. 1
  571. 1
  572. 1
  573. 1
  574. 1
  575. 1
  576. 1
  577. 1
  578. 1
  579. 1
  580. 1
  581. 1
  582. 1
  583. 1
  584. 1
  585. 1
  586. 1
  587. 1
  588. 1
  589. 1
  590. 1
  591. 1
  592. 1
  593. 1
  594. 1
  595. 1
  596. 1
  597. 1
  598. 1
  599. 1
  600. 1
  601. 1
  602. 1
  603. 1
  604. 1
  605. 1
  606. 1
  607. 1
  608. 1
  609. 1
  610. 1
  611. 1
  612. 1
  613. 1
  614. 1
  615. 1
  616. 1
  617. 1
  618. 1
  619. 1
  620. 1
  621. 1
  622. 1
  623. 1
  624. 1
  625. 1
  626. 1
  627. 1
  628. 1
  629.  @calenhoover1124  The rules of economics haven't changed in thousands of years but sure let's pretend a lecture being 40 years old makes it irrelevant. "your argument still falls flat in the face of hundreds of years of democratic and civil advance in the U.S." - How has there been any democratic advance? Ever since the beginning the power is less and less in the hands of the electorate. "The United States ranks at the top in housing...." - You're doing the same as the CCP paid shills. Who cares that there's a tyrannical government and power and there's no freedom? The rankings say the economy is great! The fact that you can amass greater wealth in the US doesn't mean that the US is democratic. "Do you really believe that one of the most powerful countries on earth that has an incredible economic winning streak is going to risk flip flopping to a tyranny" - The Empire always comes home. That question required a pinch of self-awareness. Power corrupts. This is like a Roman scoffing at the thought of the Roman Empire ever crumbling down. Tyranny isn't throwing the power away. It's the way to maintain it during times of crisis. "i've provided quotes from peer reviewed studies" - You didn't, but that's fine. "to exemplify to you that the U.S has no motive for your claims" - But you aren't even able to question the fact that the US government is growing in power and unable to stop. ""More Power" isnt a motive either because the senators and even the president themselves are subject to any laws they write or pass" - 1) this wasn't true until the 90s and caused a huge stir in the 80s 2) it's us the little people who need things like encrypted communications to prevent spying from the government, not politicians 3) they can staff the agencies with partisan hacks 4) in cases like these they are sort of exempt because they can prohibit companies from providing us end-to-end encryption while they contract a security company to provide them encryption services for "national security". "Let me know when that happens and we can talk" - Okay. Do you think the military, secret service, everyone who receives classified emails, etc is gonna be forced to work without encryption? "Please provide some proof or arguments that arent a 40 year old ted talk." - That was only about how government action doesn't improve the country, wealth generation does. Government action may actually do the opposite of what it attempts to do. Like rent control being responsible for rents increasing.
    1
  630. 1
  631. 1
  632. 1
  633. 1
  634. 1
  635. 1
  636. 1
  637. 1
  638. 1
  639. 1
  640. 1
  641. 1
  642. 1
  643. 1
  644. 1
  645. 1
  646. 1
  647. 1
  648. 1
  649. 1
  650. 1
  651. 1
  652. 1
  653. 1
  654. 1
  655. 1
  656. 1
  657. 1
  658. 1
  659. 1
  660. 1
  661. 1
  662. 1
  663. 1
  664. 1
  665. 1
  666. 1
  667. 1
  668. 1
  669. 1
  670. 1
  671. 1
  672. 1
  673. 1
  674. 1
  675. 1
  676. 1
  677. 1
  678. 1
  679. 1
  680. 1
  681. 1
  682. 1
  683. 1
  684. 1
  685. 1
  686. 1
  687. 1
  688. 1
  689. 1
  690. 1
  691. 1
  692. 1
  693. 1
  694. 1
  695. 1
  696. 1
  697. 1
  698. 1
  699. 1
  700. 1
  701. 1
  702. 1
  703. 1
  704. 1
  705. 1
  706. 1
  707. 1
  708. 1
  709. 1
  710. 1
  711. 1
  712. 1
  713. 1
  714. 1
  715. 1
  716. 1
  717. 1
  718. 1
  719. 1
  720. 1
  721. 1
  722. 1
  723. 1
  724. 1
  725. 1
  726. 1
  727. 1
  728. 1
  729. 1
  730. 1
  731. 1
  732. 1
  733. 1
  734. 1
  735. 1
  736. 1
  737. 1
  738. 1
  739. 1
  740. 1
  741. 1
  742. 1
  743. 1
  744. 1
  745. 1
  746. 1
  747. 1
  748. 1
  749. 1
  750. 1
  751. 1
  752. 1
  753. 1
  754. 1
  755. 1
  756. 1
  757. 1
  758. 1
  759. 1
  760. 1