Comments by "Titanium Rain" (@ChucksSEADnDEAD) on "Joe Biden's comeback to heckler draws crowd applause" video.

@superherophysique1037 "if you show your taxes....anything outside of that is pure baseless assumption." - why did his son get a cushy job in Ukraine? No assumption, just fact. He was gifted a job he is not qualified to do. How would using one's power to get your son a cushy job end up in someone's tax returns?
2
@superherophysique1037 "If he released 21yrs of his tax returns...then it should exonerate him of any accusations of corruption" - no, it doesn't. If you release your tax returns it only allows people to check if you have discrepancies. It doesn't mean you're not committing fraud, omitting income, or straight up being corrupt. Corruption doesn't necessarily manifest itself on your tax returns. Like if you used your position in politics to get your son a cushy job that would be corruption but nothing about your tax returns would change. And your son's tax returns would look legit because he was given a job through which he gets legal money. No offense, but you honestly believe that simply having tax returns that look right automatically exonerates anyone?
1
@superherophysique1037 "there is a lack of common sense here that believes someone is corrupt even after you release your tax returns." - what does that even mean? If you release your tax returns it simply means you're not hiding legal income to dodge taxes. If you have illicit income or any other sort of corruption, that doesn't show up on your tax returns. People don't file their tax returns with "I used my position of power to get my son a cushy job, please don't make this information public or I'm fucked". "Tax returns leave a paper trail leading to a crime." - You think drug dealers file their crimes with the tax returns? Jesus Christ, the tax returns thing is only regarding tax fraud and whatnot. If you commit a hit and run it doesn't show up on your tax returns. Conversely, you can be corrupt in politics but none of it showing up on your taxes. If you help a company make money through your position in politics, and in return that company invites you to perform a speech and they pay you 100,000 for the speech, that's legit income. It doesn't prove any crime because it's perfectly legal to get paid for the service. "It's hard to push corruption when someone is being transparent like that" - classic misdirection. Don't tell me you're falling for it. "so I say again...if he is willing to show his tax returns" - and I say again, are you fucking 12? For real, are you a literal child? Do you understand that "corruption" doesn't show up on your tax returns? "then shouldn't that exonerate him of any back door deals" - of course not!
1
@superherophysique1037 "I mean you even quoted the very thing that you didnt even address....which was anything outside his taxes is baseless assumption" - it's not baseless assumption that his son got a cushy job that he isn't qualified for. That's a fact. "US intelligence agency" - why do you keep mentioning "intelligence agencies"? This isn't an intelligence matter but a justice one. "to look into Biden" - looking into someone requires political will to do so. Just because a government isn't willing to go after another government guy that is not evidence of innocence, if anything it just cements the fact that corruption exists at every level of government. ".so your whole paragraph is you just putting up the very thing I rebutted. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯" - Nope, I am literally defeating every argument you have while you run in circles and use fallacies to shill for a shitbag. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
1
@superherophysique1037 I can't even process the level of shilling one has to lower himself to. You practically said that releasing tax returns would exonerate someone from all crimes. I don't give a shit Joe Biden pays his taxes. I would actually respect him if he was committing tax fraud. But you can amass unexplained revenue as long as you don't report it, politicians have means to mask what they own so that they don't come under scrutiny. So what people get in trouble over unexplained revenue? The real corrupt guys use corruption to get explained revenue, like a book deal or getting paid heavy sums for speeches. "And to scoff that there is no corruption can show up on you tax returns?? Lol" - corruption doesn't show up in your tax returns. The act of being corrupt doesn't appear on a piece of paper. The revenue you get from corruption might, but someone in politics for literal decades knows how to keep tax returns clean.
1
@SteveGillham conspiracy theory lmao the guy can fondle children on camera and you'll call it conspiracy theory
1
@SteveGillham https://duckduckgo.com/?q=creepy+joe+biden
1
@SteveGillham Nice of you to upvote your own comment. I have to provide a link to the sites? Why? I already provided the evidence. It was your job to point out the evidence has been manipulated. "These theories started on 4chan" - What theory? The pictures exist. There's no theory. "you picked it up and believe it true" - No, I simply saw the pictures myself. Years ago. I didn't need to pick anything up.
1
@SteveGillham "the pictures where cropped and mislabeled to give false narrative" - show the originals, then. "Each example I can give you the real back story to the image, instead of the fake narrative that was put out to smear." - then why didn't you?
1
@SteveGillham You need to back up your claims. I'm being manipulated? Worst case scenario and I'm wrong, I simply didn't trust powerful people. All is well. What if you're being manipulated? Worst case scenario, if you're wrong, you're defending criminals and disgusting monsters. So, simply not trusting politicians is the safest bet. "I don't like Biden, yet I don't spread fake rumours about him." - you've defended him multiple times by claiming the images have been doctored and bringing irrelevant narratives to the table. You don't like Biden, but you defend him. You don't spread fake rumors, but you run your own narratives without evidence. So which is it? Also, "rumours" is British English. Foreign interference? Ahahaha.
1
@SteveGillham "You think there is no harm in you spreading these rumours, well there is. It's has major affects on society, just imagine if lots of people on the internet started saying you were having sexy with sheep, and then you lose your job over it even though it was completely false." - If there were pictures of me fondling sheep then I guess people would be suspicious. "If the stories were true Biden would be locked up" - That's ridiculous. First of all, you can't say that because lack of conviction doesn't imply that the crime hasn't been committed. There's people who obviously committed crimes but walked because of connections, jury intimidation, technicalities, etc. Second, there's an entire history of rich and powerful people not getting in trouble for crimes. Considering how obvious it is that what you're saying can't be a real litmus test, you're at this point 100% shilling for Biden because of the levels of denial necessary to say such ridiculous things. "If you believe it true then report Biden to the police as it's your duty to protect children" - and tell them what? That Creepy Uncle Joe likes children jumping on his lap? That's not an actionable complaint.
1
@SteveGillham I already backed them up. It was you who made the claim that the evidence was fake, and then refused to back it up.
1
@SteveGillham that I have backed up and you failed to disprove the evidence. Did Joe not touch those women?
1
@stanklepoot dude fondled children on camera and you call it a conspiracy theory. How delusional do you have to be?
1