Comments by "Titanium Rain" (@ChucksSEADnDEAD) on "Hear what unvaccinated Covid patients told Don Lemon" video.

@Roller_Ghoster Again, you justified it with hospitalization rates. Not infectiousness. Someone who isn't infected cannot spread. It's not a strawman argument. A strawman is erecting an easier form of the argument and taking it down. This is an analogy. There's actually contagious diseases that cause cancer but that's beyond the point. Someone with cancer has the choice to not fight it. Same as having the choice to not fight the coof. A person vaccinated and infected can still spread it, so there's just no justification to let infected vaccinated people enter. My chances of dying are about the same as getting a severe side effect. There's no point. How am I posing a threat? If I get vaccinated, I can still infect them. At I won't have serious symptoms so I'll spread it easily. While if I get ill, I'll self-isolate and protect them. Let's see how wise your life choices are when the powers that be finally admit the shots are causing antibody dependent enhancement.
2
@axigon6904 But they had time to babysit a camera crew. Like it or not, you could not leave them alone.
1
@politicaltroll8920 make an exception for one, you make an exception for all
1
@hahaimabitch1 You're free to buy a ticket and travel to conflict zones. But you can't go into these wards. Very different.
1
@Roller_Ghoster we heard that one last year, didn't work
1
@Plodding Dream science also offered massive mistakes, you seem to forget that
1
@Roller_Ghoster You really love bringing up magnetism. Either way, I'm not scared of household chemicals - still won't drink them. Strawman argument.
1
@Roller_Ghoster 95% effective at suppressing symptoms two weeks after the second shot. Meanwhile in the real world, effectiveness rates are dropping to the 50s and 40s based on age group and variant. Data from Israel suggests it's highly effective in people in their 70s and above, but it drops off with age. Also, it fades pretty quickly. Buddy they're gonna require a third shot down the line. If it was 90% effective it wouldn't need it.
1
@axigon6904 If anything, the camera crew has less rights. The last people I'd want in an infectious disease ward would be media. But apparently the hospital board of directors is more concerned in media exposure than safety or who has the right to enter the wards.
1
@Roller_Ghoster Okay. So why are people being barred from businesses or jobs for not wanting to get the prophylactic treatment?
1
@Roller_Ghoster It doesn't make any sense. So a symptomatic vaccinated person can freely spread, but an unvaccinated who isn't even infected is barred from entry. Chances of being hospitalized are a personal choice. Why should someone be barred? Should someone who made the choice to not go under chemo also be barred from entering a business? It's not a vaccine considering it's only a symptom suppressor. Those who are vaccinated do not have a head start. They were not exposed to the virus. Neither the mRNA or adenovirus vaccines expose people to the virus. You don't even understand the technology being used. What about those who WERE exposed to the virus for real? Shouldn't they get a pass? How do you get herd immunity if it's still spreading an mutating?
1