Comments by "Titanium Rain" (@ChucksSEADnDEAD) on "Gunmen Fire 'Blanks' at Teachers to 'Test Readiness'" video.

  1. How many of them were trained, though? How many of them had guns? This proves nothing. This was a sick experiment. A terrible, disgusting joke of a "test". What if a teacher kept his/her head cool and stuck a pencil trough the shooter's eye socket? Or if a teacher that does martial arts disarmed the shooter and shot him pointblank (blanks kill at close range)?
    1
  2. The irony is that this was most likely a "test" made by anti-gun people. They are usually ignorant about what they are dealing with, I wouldn't doubt that whoever was the sick bastard who thought of this probably didn't know that blank firing guns have killed people before or that a teacher paranoid about a school shooting could have brought a gun into school illegally. I wouldn't say "fuck this country", I'd say "fuck the people in charge".
    1
  3. Children were not in school, only teacher meetings were targeted by the fake attack.
    1
  4. I got to this news from a pro-gun website and pro-gun people are ANGRY. This was most likely done by anti-gun people, not the pro-gun side. This was extremely retarded. I am pro-gun - I don't even want people shooting up places with blanks, let alone real guns. You are extremely prejudiced. You're a bigot and you know NOTHING about pro-gun people. All of us think this was a terrible mistake as PEOPLE HAVE BEEN KILLED BY BLANK GUNS before.
    1
  5. >It doesn't follow. Yes, it does. First, gives bad publicity to the pro-gun side. Second, it somehow proves something about people not being able to react to a shooter. >What's far more likely is that it was a group of gun nuts trying to make a point of how defenseless they were. The pro gun side is realist. They would have considered someone fighting back and getting killed/kill the shooter. >no regard for human life >no business being anywhere near firearms Yeap, they were anti gun.
    1