Comments by "Titanium Rain" (@ChucksSEADnDEAD) on "NATO Rejects Ukraine Membership Bid; UK Tory Government Heading to Oblivion" video.

  1.  @judithafholland  Odessa? Russia is getting defeated in Kherson, they can't even get to Mykolaiv let alone Odessa.
    3
  2. How many pieces has Russia given up without ever setting any traps?
    2
  3.  @mikelee7318  You do know that taking off, doing a 180º and landing counts as a "sortie", right? A sortie doesn't have to involve combat. Russian soldiers are begging for air support on social media because command isn't responding. Real life is not like the youtube comments where Russia is conducting 200 combat missions a day.
    2
  4.  @thathandsomedevil0828  Mariupol was not pointless. It was a tremendous sacrifice but the siege of Mariupol tied up thousands of Russian forces needed elsewhere. The defenders sacrificed themselves to save the nation.
    2
  5.  @Natalya.57.Volkova  This is the right channel. This is where all the Z-anon folks get together, and we need to flagelate them with the reality. I think it's funny. We do learn about WW2 in the West. For about two weeks. Then we move on to European reconstruction. Meanwhile just like you said, you are whipped into a frenzy about the Great Patriotic war. That's a psyop. We learn about the Kings and Queens because we need to understand centuries of conflict, intrigues and alliances to be aware of how Europe is the war it is. And we learn that both world wars were terrible for the European people, and despite our differences we came up with the concept of not fighting against each other again. For all the EU's faults, at least we started an economic partnership to rebuild ourselves. While you're still revisiting sacrifice year after year. What about the good things? What about moving on?
    2
  6.  @mars353  Lyman is strategically important because it's the springboard for Kreminna, which will allow a flanking of the Lysychansk-Severodonetsk axis. Bakhmut will become irrelevant if the Ukrainian army is simply going to slip behind the Russian forces and cause the collapse in Luhansk.
    2
  7.  @tinpu1056  What's the priority? Because it seems like "not being defeated" is not on the top of their list of priorities.
    2
  8. No, NATO actually said that Ukraine would win before the process to join could be finished. They're not saying they're not wanted. They're saying that Ukraine is so strong, they don't even need NATO membership.
    2
  9.  @mischa1880  I enjoy causing mental grief to Z-anon cultists.
    2
  10. Scott Ritter is a clown. We haven't even started. Winter will be so much worse for the Russian troops.
    1
  11.  @AsterixYZ  Their professional army isn't alive. 300k replacements for 6k losses. Are you sure?
    1
  12. In the 90s Mearsheimer said that Ukraine should keep their nukes to keep Russia at bay.
    1
  13.  @Micks63  Okay, is the Tornado S winning the war? Like 12 HIMARS vehicles and a handful of M270/MARS punched the Russian army's teeth off. Meanwhile what is the Tornado S doing? Nothing. Probably just bombing orphanages and kindergartens.
    1
  14.  @thathandsomedevil0828  Very few. Routing the enemy is when you suffer the least casualties, while enjoying a turkey shoot. Mariupol will be liberated, but tragically it will be symbolic. The Russians ravaged it. Yeah, they were under siege. And resisted until they couldn't, saving their country.
    1
  15.  @thathandsomedevil0828  They released them. Putin released Azov to save his personal friend.
    1
  16.  @thathandsomedevil0828  Of course it makes sense. The proof is everywhere. The Azov guys were released in exchange for Medvedchuck and something like 50 Russian soldiers. Ukrainians got back about a hundred something Azov fighters out of the 200 captured in Azovstal. Denis Propenko or whatever his name is, is free again and in Turkey. The British guy... Aidan or Aslan? Also free.
    1
  17.  @carlosproano840  There is no hammer. Simply put Russia has nothing left except nuclear blackmail. Trying to use it would be suicide so realistically they will suffer a major defeat.
    1
  18.  @maksimmatkun9227  Here's what's understood: Russia has suffered at least 50,000 KIA and 100,000 WIA due to their poor combat medicine (Belarus data shows they suffered 1:1.6 KIA:WIA ratios in the Kiev advance). This means their professional military was torn to shreds. Their professional units that are still combat effective are trapped in Kherson and lacking supplies. They cannot advance or retreat across the Dnipr. The rest is manned by LDPR militia, reservist/volunteer battalions and PMCs. You are watching the slow motion collapse of the Russian armed forces.
    1
  19.  @maksimmatkun9227  It's not overexaggerated if we look at the ground. The frontline collapses are due to lack of manpower. How can they lack manpower after shadow mobilization? Tons of KIAs and WIAs.
    1
  20.  @stephenvanwoert2447  Save their lives? The road out of Lyman is littered with Russian corpses.
    1
  21. It wasn't good news. NATO's argument was that Ukraine will win before they could process the application. Things are bad... very bad. For you, that is. I'm on Ukraine's side.
    1
  22.  @biomorphic  Now Russia attacked a German consulate. Prepare for Leopard 2.
    1
  23. Kids are greeting the Ukrainian soldiers with Ukrainian flags. The local population doesn't want the Russians back.
    1
  24. Kadyrov is a Prada-wearing clown. His troops are meant for internal suppression. His father was a traitor to Chechnya. There's Chechens fighting for Ukraine because of what Russia did to them. Kadyrovites are just lackeys.
    1