Comments by "Titanium Rain" (@ChucksSEADnDEAD) on "Is this the FUTURE of Aviation?!" video.

@Markle2k "the nuclear option is just opting to back-load the "what do we do with the emissions" to entire civilization, not just a few future generations" - Not really. If the "emissions" get stopped by a few feet of concrete I chalk it up as a win.
4
@deus_ex_machina_ That's not what he asked.
3
@alandaters8547 "if the waste issue can be solved" - it has been... but two administrations have undermined Yucca mountain.
3
@Markle2k I like that in your version of human history we survived 3000 more years without using, remembering or understanding nuclear power but managed to bore a deep ass hole and started cracking canisters just for fun.
3
@5Andysalive "You can use it for rockets, why not for big planes." - rockets explode much more frequently than planes
2
@Markle2k Holy crap what an unimaginative person you are. If we're in the year 5020, then everything that happened previously is human history. You created a fictional version of human history for all the events that took place from 2020 to 5019. In 5020, 5019 and everything before... is the past. "The casks are not going to be dropped down a "deep ass hole"." - I don't know who made you the manager of the disposal project, just out of a sudden you remotely stopped the existing geological burial sites with a youtube comment?
2
@VolkerHett aren't the mirror arrays annoying death rays that cook birds?
1
@COIcultist Apparently (anyone feel free to fact check me on this) but California pays Arizona to take their excess solar energy while Arizona simply stops producing solar. California looks good on paper pretending they're offsetting carbon emissions and the neighboring states get free money. One of the reasons solar is so bad at satisfying energy needs is that peak production and peak load do not align, and nothing short of a miracle will make batteries feasible to store the excess energy. Electrolysis is inefficient but nobody cares about inefficiency when you're using power nobody wants. You think 1/3rd of the product, or even 8/9ths is wasteful? We go through much more wasteful processes. I have my gripes with hydrogen but this ain't it chief.
1
@deus_ex_machina_ "much better than coal power" - is there anything worse than coal power? But yeah water electrolysis can be used to take in excess power generation.
1
@Dean.Hilleary "where so much is spent on more or less "unburning" Hydrogen so we can... burn it again" - But at least it's a cycle, so you're not adding carbon to the atmosphere if the electrolysis and compression of the fuel comes from solar/nuclear.
1
@Markle2k How.. how is running away with one's imagination to correctly consider the past to be history? "I'm not the manager of the disposal project. But you certainly are not, either." - Dude this isn't the time for childish nuh-uh like it's the goddamn recess, do you have an argument or not? "None of them involve dropping casks" - Nice strawman, strike three. Get out.
1