Comments by "Titanium Rain" (@ChucksSEADnDEAD) on "PowerfulJRE" channel.

  1. 51
  2. 43
  3. 24
  4. 21
  5. 18
  6. 18
  7. 17
  8. 16
  9. 12
  10. 10
  11. 10
  12. 9
  13. 9
  14. 9
  15. 8
  16. 8
  17. 8
  18. 7
  19. 7
  20. 6
  21. 6
  22. 6
  23. 6
  24. 6
  25. 5
  26. 4
  27. 4
  28. 4
  29. 4
  30. 4
  31. 4
  32. 4
  33. 3
  34. 3
  35. 3
  36. 3
  37. 3
  38. 3
  39. 3
  40. 3
  41. 3
  42. 3
  43. 3
  44. 3
  45. 3
  46. 3
  47. 3
  48. 3
  49. 3
  50. 3
  51. 3
  52. 3
  53. 3
  54. 3
  55. 3
  56. 3
  57. 3
  58. 3
  59. 3
  60. 2
  61. 2
  62. 2
  63. 2
  64. 2
  65. 2
  66. 2
  67. 2
  68. 2
  69. 2
  70. 2
  71. 2
  72. 2
  73. 2
  74. 2
  75. 2
  76. 2
  77. 2
  78. 2
  79. 2
  80. 2
  81. 2
  82. 2
  83. 2
  84. 2
  85. 2
  86. 2
  87. 2
  88. 2
  89. 2
  90. 2
  91. 2
  92. 2
  93. 2
  94. 2
  95. 2
  96. 2
  97. 2
  98. 2
  99. 2
  100. 2
  101. 2
  102. 2
  103. 2
  104. 2
  105. 2
  106. 2
  107. 2
  108. 2
  109. 2
  110. 2
  111. 2
  112. 2
  113. 2
  114. 2
  115. 2
  116. 2
  117. 2
  118. 2
  119. 2
  120. 2
  121. 2
  122. 2
  123. 2
  124. 2
  125. 2
  126. 2
  127. 2
  128. 2
  129. 2
  130. 2
  131. 2
  132. 2
  133. 2
  134. 2
  135. 2
  136. 2
  137. 2
  138. 2
  139. 2
  140. 2
  141. 1
  142. 1
  143. 1
  144. 1
  145. 1
  146. 1
  147. 1
  148. 1
  149. 1
  150. 1
  151. 1
  152. 1
  153. 1
  154. 1
  155. 1
  156. 1
  157. 1
  158. 1
  159. 1
  160. 1
  161. 1
  162. 1
  163. 1
  164. 1
  165. 1
  166. 1
  167. 1
  168. 1
  169. 1
  170. 1
  171. 1
  172. 1
  173. 1
  174. 1
  175. 1
  176. 1
  177. 1
  178. 1
  179. 1
  180. 1
  181. 1
  182. 1
  183. 1
  184. 1
  185. 1
  186. "lets say you saw someone in public reach into an old ladies purse and steal $100, the question becomes do your morally object to that? Do you say/do something? I think most people would take issue to that, change it to stealing cookies from a girl scout, whatever you like... This doesn't make a person a sheep" - You're using outright THEFT as your example. You correctly called out a logical fallacy and then you use the exact same type. "it makes them a reasonable member of society who cares about others around them" - This isn't about caring. You're giving too much credit to the mindset. They don't berate others because they actually care because they don't. It's low status people getting their rocks off. It's like being in a twitter mob but in real life. The propaganda literally tells people to be "heroes". They want that. "There is a large amount of our population who don't wear masks, and instead of reaching in and stealing money for the old ladies purse they are playing russian roulette with the lives of every single person" - This is false. The masks only decrease the velocity of particles coughed or sneezed, and capture some depending on mask efficiency (most masks people wear are extremely low efficiency). If we go back 10 months you'll see the infographs and 3d renders showing that without mask your sneeze particles can jump 20 feet or whatever and with a mask 6 feet (hence the distancing thing). You're still infecting people, but at a slower rate. Again, if you go back the narrative was that we were slowing the spread (people still get infected with masks and social distancing, just less at the same time) and not eliminating it. So no matter what you do, you're ALWAYS playing Russian roulette. The mask only loads a plastic bullet instead of a lead one. A contact shot will punch through a skull, but the bullet loses velocity quickly at a distance and becomes progressively less dangerous. "You're a monster. Literally mass murders" - Oh, you're too far gone. You're actually those people. "you will never know that number" - You will never know the number of people who starved because of the economies stalling, you will never know the number of people who died because they missed appointments or cancer treatments.
    1
  187. 1
  188. 1
  189. 1
  190. 1
  191. 1
  192. 1
  193. 1
  194. 1
  195. 1
  196. 1
  197. 1
  198. 1
  199. 1
  200. 1
  201. 1
  202. 1
  203. 1
  204. 1
  205. 1
  206. 1
  207. 1
  208. 1
  209. 1
  210. 1
  211. 1
  212. 1
  213. 1
  214. 1
  215. 1
  216. 1
  217. 1
  218. 1
  219. 1
  220. 1
  221. 1
  222. 1
  223. 1
  224. 1
  225. 1
  226. 1
  227. 1
  228. 1
  229. 1
  230. 1
  231. 1
  232. 1
  233. 1
  234. 1
  235. 1
  236. 1
  237. 1
  238. 1
  239. 1
  240. 1
  241. 1
  242.  @vibesanm  I looked it up before you even posted, and all the sources say the social security funds were never appropriated by the government. It's a popular hoax to claim that the government took funds and that shit spreads through chain emails since the 2000s. Just like there's a popular hoax that congress members are exempt from paying into social security and whatnot. Ya got played by modern folklore and now you'll do everything but admit but admit you were fooled. If the government has indeed reached into social security funds then at least provide the evidence for the claim. This isn't a purity test. It isn't protected. All it takes is a law to change how things work. "no goddamn thing is protected, not your life, not your right to vote, nothing." - That is correct. Do you think that is an axe murderer is about to swing on you the government arrives and say "nuh-uh, his life is protected"? If you jump off a cliff you think the government is gonna cushion your fall because you're "protected"? No. "So lets dismantle everything and live in a lawless, institution less society" - Nice strawman argument. "listening to alt right nutjobs." - Shut the fuck up. You're the nutjob calling everyone you dislike a fucking Nazi. Pathetic. "Regan and bush took funds from ssn" - Prove it. "and shows how much in absolute denial you are and how much so full of shit you are." - You posted no evidence. Fucking prove it. You can't. And you claim others are full of shit. https://www.fool.com/retirement/2018/05/20/did-congress-really-steal-from-social-security.aspx https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2015/aug/03/facebook-posts/did-george-w-bush-borrow-social-security-fund-war-/ You're full of shit, buddy. About time you admitted it.
    1
  243. 1
  244. 1
  245. 1
  246. 1
  247. 1
  248. 1
  249. 1
  250. 1
  251. 1
  252. 1
  253. 1
  254. 1
  255. 1
  256. 1
  257. 1
  258. 1
  259. 1
  260. 1
  261. 1
  262. 1
  263. 1
  264. 1
  265. 1
  266. 1
  267. 1
  268.  @NoMoeMistaNiceGuy  First of all, that's a fairytale view of WWII. Germany started the conflict due to their government spending creating a bubble, the military conflict and the seizing of assets from foreign banks helped mask the impending economic crash. They were totally unprepared for the war, as evidenced by their chronic oil shortages. Their plan was seizing oil fields from the Soviet Union. The sabotage from the crews as they evacuated the region meant that the Germans were eventually repelled from the oil fields before they could restore the extraction capabilities. There was no way Americans would be speaking German, because simply put Germany lacked the capability to do so. Another aspect is that WWII only happened because of WWI. No WWI, no WWII. So in the end, you're trying to say we need violent foreign policy to make up for our own mistakes when we used violent foreign policy. It's absolutely ridiculous. So we need to be killing people in Yemen to prevent the Saudis from dealing with China? Have you thought that maybe Chinese people also think they're the ones who need to be running the markets to prevent the US from waging these conflicts? China and Russia would take part? Fine. We have been driven into trillion dollar wars. Let them fight. Let them bankrupt themselves. According to the 2010 VA statistic our veterans at one point were committing an average of 22 suicides a day. Many of them were from older generations from before the Afghanistan and 2003 Iraq conflicts but the point still stands. How about they suffer this time? If they want to put their own soldiers through this, let them. Russia and China suffer from many internal issues, some of which are talk about, others that are kept under wraps. We have our own internal issues. And you want to add wars to that? No. It's killing us. If they want to take their internal issues and throw war on top of that, it's their own suicide.
    1
  269. 1
  270. 1
  271. 1
  272. 1
  273. 1
  274. 1
  275. 1
  276. 1
  277. 1
  278. 1
  279. 1
  280. 1
  281. 1
  282. 1
  283. 1
  284. 1
  285. 1
  286. 1
  287. 1
  288. 1
  289. 1
  290. 1
  291. 1
  292. 1
  293. 1
  294. 1
  295. 1
  296. 1
  297. 1
  298. 1
  299. 1
  300. 1
  301. 1
  302. 1
  303. 1
  304. 1
  305. 1
  306. 1
  307. 1
  308. 1
  309. 1
  310. 1
  311. 1
  312. 1
  313. 1
  314. 1
  315. 1
  316. 1
  317. 1
  318. 1
  319. 1
  320. 1
  321. 1
  322. 1
  323. 1
  324. 1
  325. 1
  326. 1
  327. 1
  328. 1
  329. 1
  330. 1
  331. 1
  332. 1
  333. 1
  334.  @CiGambino  Yeah but when given a link it opens on the browser, the button that acts as "swipe" is almost imperceptible. 1. You can find information that isn't about chickens from established sources - not Vanden Bossche, by the way. Nitpicking the detail that humans and poultry are different is strange. 2. Yeah there's a trend line but you can see dots all over the place. With a high enough population carrying up to 27 days at the same levels of the dirty unvaccinated, yeah man we ain't winning the fight. 3. That data is coming from the US, which is only recording hospitalizations. I'd like to see international data. 4. Sure, I don't know who said otherwise. 5. Emergence? Too late. We need to check for spread. Like shown India has low vaccination rates and China's Sinovac appears to be less effective, as expected. Telling the X million Americans who haven taken it to take it when there's almost 2 billion hosting the thing... Buddy... 6. Again, if the argument is "slow down the spread"... we tried that. Didn't work. Even with slower spread it hangs around and peaks later. And to answer the question, you'll gladly give you the honor to pull my plug if I come down with the coof. 7. CFR for 12-30 averages closer to 0.028%, not .10% per CDC data. Additionally, Israel saw an increase in acute coronary syndrome and cardiac arrest in the younger age groups compared to the 2019 and 2020 average. A very small percentage compared with the number of vaccinated of course, but risks have to be weighed. Again, per CDC data ages 0-17 had more deaths than the flu, but less than half than the ones by pneumonia. A mass campaign targeting the youth, even with very low chances of side effects, is gonna affect more people than the ones we lost. Same reason the British didn't fire AAA at incoming V2s over London.
    1
  335. 1
  336. 1
  337. 1
  338. 1
  339. 1
  340. 1
  341. 1
  342. 1
  343. 1
  344. 1
  345. 1
  346. 1
  347. 1
  348. 1
  349. 1
  350. 1
  351. 1
  352. 1
  353. 1
  354. 1
  355. 1
  356. 1
  357. 1
  358. 1
  359. 1
  360. 1
  361. 1
  362. 1
  363. 1
  364. 1
  365. 1
  366. 1
  367. 1
  368. 1
  369. 1
  370. 1
  371. 1
  372. 1
  373. 1
  374. 1
  375. 1
  376. 1
  377. 1
  378. 1
  379. 1
  380. 1
  381. 1
  382. 1
  383. 1
  384. 1
  385. 1
  386. 1
  387. 1
  388. 1
  389. 1
  390. 1
  391. 1
  392. 1
  393. 1
  394. 1
  395.  @pccalcio  "tens of testimonies have been registered." - Only four people were involved in Fravor's flight. I need those other two's description of the events. "after resetting the radar" - Resetting doesn't make errors go away by magic. "A possible radar malfunctions has been therefore ticked off." - No. There's multiple errors that do not go away with a reset. "you have military officials talking on TV to urge a more in depth investigation, you just don't want to look at it as information" - Again, the Chilean military was unable to identify a UFO that Mick West and the people at Metabunk were able to identify as an airliner 60 miles away. Military officers don't know what they don't know. "do you really want to compare the training of a debunker" - No, I'm mocking the fact that an elementary school kid can understand the principles involved. I'm not comparing, I'm mocking. Because frankly it's embarrassing. "with the training a fighter pilot has to go through" - They're not trained to know what they don't know. Again, UFO footage has been solved by nerds on the internet that the military couldn't solve. Being trained to fly against other aircraft doesn't make someone an expert at identifying things they've never seen. "so in a trial, a direct testimony has no value, right" - You do realize that the more we understand about the topic the less eyewitness testimony is considered credible, right? You've seen the test where witnesses asked about the velocity of a car that rammed another at 30 mph said they witnessed a 60 mph car crash simply by changing the phrasing of the question, right? Simple words can make people misremember their memories. "I'm having fun XD" - No I'm having fun because it's amazing how you still haven't debunked elementary school math, a former fighter pilot embarrassed himself because he can't debunk elementary school math so his only response is getting angry on Lex Friendman's podcast, you think that pilots are superhumans and they're trained to identify every single object or phenomena and that eyewitness testimony hasn't been scientifically tested to have massive problems with how reliable it is. The more this goes on the more it shows you're afraid of checking the calculations. Mick West's math is available for anyone to debunk and you're all unable to fight him with actual evidence so you have to engage with strawmen, Ad Hominem and Appeal to Authority fallacies. I'm the one having fun because it shows how many people are afraid of numbers.
    1
  396. 1
  397. 1
  398. 1
  399. 1
  400. 1
  401. 1
  402. 1
  403. 1
  404. 1
  405. 1
  406. 1
  407. 1
  408. 1
  409. 1
  410. 1
  411. 1
  412. 1
  413. 1
  414. 1
  415. 1
  416. 1
  417. 1
  418. 1
  419. 1
  420. 1
  421. 1
  422. 1
  423. 1
  424. 1
  425. 1
  426. 1
  427. 1
  428. 1
  429. 1
  430. 1
  431. 1
  432. 1
  433. 1
  434. 1
  435. 1
  436. 1
  437. 1
  438. 1
  439. 1
  440. 1
  441. 1
  442. 1
  443. 1
  444. 1
  445. 1
  446. 1
  447. 1
  448. 1
  449. 1
  450. 1
  451. 1
  452. 1
  453. 1
  454. 1
  455. 1
  456. 1
  457. 1
  458. 1
  459. 1
  460. 1
  461. 1
  462. 1
  463. 1
  464. 1
  465. 1
  466. 1
  467. 1
  468. 1
  469. 1
  470. 1
  471. 1
  472. 1
  473. 1
  474. 1
  475. 1
  476. 1
  477. 1
  478. 1
  479. 1
  480. 1
  481. 1
  482. 1
  483. 1
  484. 1
  485. 1
  486. 1
  487. 1
  488. 1
  489. 1
  490. 1
  491. 1
  492. 1
  493. 1
  494. 1
  495. 1
  496. 1
  497. 1
  498. 1
  499. 1
  500. 1
  501. 1
  502. 1
  503. 1
  504. 1
  505. 1
  506. 1
  507. 1
  508. 1
  509. 1
  510. 1
  511. 1
  512. 1
  513. 1
  514. 1
  515. 1
  516. 1
  517. 1
  518. 1
  519. 1
  520. 1
  521. 1
  522. 1
  523. 1
  524. 1
  525. 1
  526. 1
  527. 1
  528. 1
  529. 1
  530. 1
  531. 1
  532. 1
  533. 1
  534. 1
  535. 1
  536. 1
  537. 1
  538. 1
  539. 1
  540. 1
  541. 1
  542. 1
  543. 1
  544. 1
  545. 1
  546. 1
  547. 1
  548. 1
  549. 1
  550. 1
  551. 1
  552. 1
  553. 1
  554. 1
  555. 1
  556. 1
  557. 1
  558. 1
  559. 1
  560. 1
  561. 1
  562. 1
  563. 1
  564. 1
  565. 1
  566. 1
  567. 1
  568. 1
  569. 1
  570. 1
  571. 1
  572. 1
  573. 1
  574. 1
  575. 1
  576. 1
  577. 1
  578. 1
  579. 1
  580. 1
  581. 1
  582. 1
  583. 1
  584. 1
  585. 1
  586. 1
  587. 1
  588. 1
  589. 1
  590. 1
  591. 1
  592. 1
  593. 1
  594. 1
  595. 1
  596. 1
  597.  @randommexican5664  Voting is just a silly popularity context. People voted for Obama to end the wars and close Gitmo. We're still in the wars and only now started talking about Guantanamo Bay. If politicians are just going to lie to get in office, how can you hold voters accountable for anything? "you vote for someone else" - Thanks for the advice man, never tried that. You're just passing the buck. Oh you don't like Biden? Vote harder next time. 4 years. You didn't like Trump? Sucked to be you for 4 years. You didn't like Obama? You didn't like Bush? Vote harder dude. Just ignore that the people you vote for LIE, and there's millions of people voting against you. "You don't go after the cop who is enforcing a law" - Actually, I go after them. "that was legislated by people who were voted in lol" - Those people would have no power if not for cops. They could legislate all they wanted, nobody would hear them outside the echo chamber. It's cops who look at the laws and say "I agree with using violence to enforce all of this, even what I disagree with". If cops are so innocent, they could just not join. Or resign. Being complicit makes them guilty. If a cartel leader orders a journalist or judge to be executed, the sicarios are not to blame? Only the head honcho is at fault? Not the thousands who signed up to serve the cartel? "why most people immediately dismiss most libertarians" - Most people are dumb. Being dismissed by most people is a sign of intelligence, if anything. "Being an edgelord isn't a tenable political platform lmao" - Neither is being an order follower or a government simp. You support the system until the day the system decides to screw you over. It's never tenable. The only tenable platform is being in control. And govt. simps are not in control. They're just the useful idiots who get sacrificed.
    1
  598. 1
  599. 1
  600. 1
  601. 1
  602. 1
  603. 1
  604. 1
  605. 1
  606. 1
  607. 1
  608. 1
  609. 1
  610. 1
  611. 1
  612. 1
  613. 1
  614. 1
  615. 1
  616. 1
  617. 1
  618. 1
  619. 1