Comments by "Titanium Rain" (@ChucksSEADnDEAD) on "Leaked Pentagon Docs Show U.S. & U.K. Special Forces Already in Ukraine as War Heads to Stalemate" video.

Because most of the contents are actually not that interesting and most of the information was public already.
19
@backdrop8469 It's not "denial", you're simply looking at a photoshopped casualty chart. If you look at the leaks there's several pages discussing Russian and Ukrainian force composition, and yet only one page had the photoshop.
5
Not true. Russia has a 3:1 loss ratio.
3
Russian troops are always filming videos begging for ammunition.
3
@OragamiSpliff Lone Survivor the Marcus Lutrell story? Not really, that's the Navy SEALs taking over a mission that was meant for a larger number of Marines that lead to them being overwhelmed.
2
@Emperors_Deathangel Not true. The military didn't split and rebel. Some of the military in Crimea was absorbed into the Russian military. This happened before any civilian death, it was just a formality. Donbas was being used as a launch platform for Russian artillery. Russia uses Hamas tactics in which they shell Ukraine, then when Ukraine hits back they complain about civilian casualties. Even though it was Russia who used the Ukrainian civilians as human shields. Russian was never banned.
2
So putin is saying that 100 foreign SOF can defeat his entire army?
2
@balisuncocoyt "is closer to what has been reported by averaging from several sources" - The Russian ones? "to know the truth you need to dig deeper ..." - Where? In Russia?
2
He's never blown the whistle. He just printed documents to show his gamer friends.
2
@g.hon.4645 The Taliban never fought the USSR. The Taliban were a bunch of "religious crusaders" who entered Afghanistan from the Pakistan border area and took advantage of the Afghan civil war after the Soviets left. When the Taliban appeared, the US continued to back the mujahedin Northern Alliance. In 2001 when the US invaded Afghanistan, the first SOF units who showed up fought side by side with Northern Alliance fighters against the Taliban.
1
@nzuncovered1845 Who said anything about Syria? The conversation was about Afghanistan.
1
@nzuncovered1845 We supported the Kurds. Now what? You're gonna lie and say the Taliban fought the USSR even though they weren't in Afghanistan at the time?
1
@Lilbluebird44 Only the exact number of foreign troops in country and the issue with air defense munitions was not public. Everything else could be found in the open. Judge Napolitano has been a disappointment because he invites loonies. However, it's always funny when the Judge finds inconsistencies in the pro-Russia shills and asks the right question. Colonel MacGregor once got so flabbergasted he was about to get caught he must have shit his pants. Thank god webcams do not pick up smell.
1
@cornpopsrazor5375 What narrative? They're not having their ass kicked. Russia can't move 50 km past Donetsk, how can they get to Poland?
1
@marcoscunha511 What was the lie?
1
@Gark1701 Says the bot.
1
@henryg3313 The bio stuff was SOVIET and the US had to come in and pay for researchers to keep working to prevent them from finding work in Iraq, Iran or North Korea. Like everything else, the Soviet Union shat the bed and the US had to clean it up.
1
@stevetilbrook3402 In the part that said it was classified and not supposed to be seen by foreigners. It's written on every page.
1
Germany, Japan, Italy, France and the UK are better places to live than Russia. How exactly was it fatal to them to be allied with the US?
1
They were found. Several US soldiers suffered neurological damage from being exposed to the nerve gas in low doses.
1
@hectorzero8545 No. The leak shows 43k Russian fatalities and 17k Ukrainian fatalities. The 10:1 artillery advantage doesn't matter when your accuracy is poor, your intelligence has several hours of delay, and your ammo dumps got blown up by HIMARS. Russians don't just sit back. Watch the videos. You don't, because they show reality. And you're scared of being confronted with reality. The combat footage clearly shows that Russia is advancing, not sitting back. The superior firepower needs scouts and artillery forward observers. If Ukrainian defenders do not fire, their positions remain hidden. So the Russian strategy of using artillery still requires Russian men to cross no-man's-land where they're attacked, and then engage Ukrainian positions to get them to fire and show themselves to observers/drones. If Russia sits back, Ukraine sits back and Russia sees nothing but trees and rubble. Ukrainians need to fire for the flash and smoke to betray their location. And for Ukrainians to fire, Russia has to attack. Watch the videos. Specifically Vuhledar. It's a massacre. They are advancing slowly because their advances get bogged down by landmines and mortar fire. They can't preserve manpower. They simply cannot. They turn empty fields into the moon surface. Shelling empty land gets them nothing. When they show up to mop up, that's when they get massacred. Rinse and repeat. Russia does not have JDAMs, stop saying things that don't make sense. They're showing off glide bombs. A JDAM is a guidance kit that corrects free-fall gravity bombs with GPS/INS.
1
@kishanchali8752 Update the script, bot. Russian forces have complained that counterbattery is absent. Russian artillery losses have increased for the past few months. Russia is using T-55s as SPGs due to ammo and barrel issues in their tube artillery. A 10:1 advantage is on paper. In real life, it's the steel that matters.
1
How? He was sharing the leaks with kids. He just wanted to look cool.
1
@jsmoncrief Journalists can't protect a leaker who posted the stuff publicly. There's a difference between journalists having confidential sources, and a kid posting stuff online to impress his underage gaming friends. Journalists can't protect him.
1
When the offensive starts come back with your drivel.
1
The Soviet Union has boots on the ground in Vietnam. That wasn't a world war.
1