Comments by "Titanium Rain" (@ChucksSEADnDEAD) on "Lauren Heike's Killer Was Released Early" video.

@amberarnold8547 No. Depending where you study architecture you can get a more art oriented degree or a more engineering heavy degree. But an architect's project still needs to be verified by an engineer. Many projects have to be changed because the artistic rendering is not feasible in the real world or trying to replicate it would be too expensive. I had a professor whose engineering project changed architect halfway and the new one put a freaking skylight in an underground subway station. The engineering team said "F it, they're paying so we'll make the changes instead of trying to talk them out of it" and had to reengineer the entire thing because the architect didn't understand that opening holes in load bearing structures would require reinforcement to compensate.
4
 @SamS-uv2ql He's not a source. Whatever article he screenshot would be the source.
4
@SamS-uv2ql Yes, you did. You said "You think "clown planet" is a good source?". That's shooting the messenger. Name the actual source if the source is wrong, then criticize Clown Planet for using it. If someone, let's say Crowder, quotes CNN as a source, do you reply "you think Crowder is a good source?". No, because CNN is the actual source, Crowder just quoted it. I assume you're one of them "but I did have breakfast!" type of person so I made an analogy to point out the thing you did and now are denying.
4
@SamS-uv2ql But it's not a source, he said where he saw it. That's not a source. If I read something on Wikipedia, and tell you to look at the Wikipedia page, that's not a source. The source is listed at the bottom. Try to keep up.
1
@SamS-uv2ql That's not how it works. A source is the originator of information. Wikipedia simply aggregates it. No, you can't source wikipedia because wikipedia prohibits original research. Wikipedia can't be the source of anything, there has to be a prior body of work. Source? By definition it's the origin.
1