Comments by "ThatHandsomeDevil08" (@thathandsomedevil0828) on "Binkov's Battlegrounds" channel.

  1. Russia won't side with China, China has been griefing them over vladivastok lately. Russia has been selling arms to India instead of China.
    23
  2. The Eagle now flying with the divine wind.
    14
  3. It's called a target rich environment, pretty certain the USA mariners won't mind. ;)
    14
  4. Simple, the rafale is cheaper and doesn't crash all the time like the F35s. The safety record of the F35 is atrocious.
    12
  5. PROPAGANDA. It's China everything is fake. Even as much as they hate Sun Tzu they still use his warfare doctrines: When weak appear strong, when strong appear weak. If the CCP truly had these capabilities their enemies would find out exactly how strong during war, not in peace time.
    9
  6. It's CCP, I am calling it a fake out.
    7
  7. Are you high? Russia is selling weapons to India right now to spite China. Russia not a fan of the CCP at the moment. It's actually looking like Russia will side with India to check China's aggressive expansion.
    7
  8. We have the secret formula for fish and chips..
    7
  9. Hey at least now you know what not to build more of.
    5
  10. China owes the United States trillions in bonds bought before the CCP took over, so no negative impact will occur to the USA.
    5
  11.  @dragonfelgrand9304  Nah all good buddy. Irony being that a mixed economy simply means letting people try to make money within the context of the law. Factor in some foreign direct investments and the Argentine economy would be off to a roaring start. I was explaining this to my girlfriend the other day, socialist economic policies fail because it can never predict the human mind. Earlier today out of the blue I ordered a pair of hand mittens from Amazon. No chance in hell can a command economy predict that. Mixed economies are like gas combustion engines; contained chaos. All the government needs to do at that point is regulate the private sector from going out of control, but letting the private sector work without intervention is the quickest way to boom an economy and lift people from poverty. I hope someday more people in Argentina will accept this and implement it. If India can do it, then so too can others.
    5
  12. All good, now go tell Erdogan to calm his tits.
    4
  13. Si vis pacem, para bellum.
    4
  14.  @dragonfelgrand9304  makes sense. I recently learned that India was in the same boat until a recently elected prime minister scrapped their socialist policies and went for a mixed economy instead. Their economy has since been growing, to the point where they can square off against the Chinese military. I mean India has an aircraft carrier loaded with Russian made fighter jets. Those things don't come cheap. I reckon Argentina needs to let go of socialism and incorporate more free market mechanisms.
    4
  15.  @ceoofdazn7615  I know that it took the US navy four weeks of constant bombardment to sink a non crewed, stationary, lone, retired aircraft carrier. China will not find it easy to hit one inside a fleet guarded by frigates, Aegis destroyers, submarines, AWACS and numerous fighter screens. All of which are moving. The US ban of computer chips to Huawei and SMIC means that China only has a limited amount of stand off weapons using advanced micro processors, which after being fired off can never be replaced as China is 20 years behind the current market. I have seen enough Chinese gaffs to know that they cannot succeed.
    3
  16.  @theresearcher8912  I don't take instructions from someone who is clearly clueless about geo politics.
    3
  17. They would also be sitting targets for stand off weapons. Tank warfare is almost obsolete.
    3
  18. A single USA AEGIS destroyer can paralyze half of if not all the current Chinese naval fleet at the moment. The CCP navy clutched their pearls in horror when a single USA AEGIS destroyer sailed through the Taiwan straits last year. It could have sank any battlegroup China wanted to field.
    3
  19. Advantage Japan has is that their armies have spent decades perfecting defensive warfare. Combine that and the fanaticism they have for their lands and you will understand why the USA had to drop two atomic bombs on them to force a surrender.
    3
  20. Most of the ships are transport vessels and shipping boats. The CCP fleet is weak. ^^
    3
  21. F35s for you.
    3
  22. With modern nuclear subs, you don't need nukes. ^^
    3
  23. Never mind all the gundam wings!!
    2
  24. People would be crazy to buy cheap, unreliable Chinese tech at this point.
    2
  25.  @theresearcher8912  I watch real factual informative news. You should do the same, that way you can be just as informed as I am.
    2
  26.  @Векычо  They have been hinting to Russian authorities that somehow Vladivastok has belonged to China since ancient times. ^^
    2
  27.  @Векычо  I reckon the whole world does, those commie ccp bastards claim otherwise. ^^
    2
  28.  @Векычо  Not the CCCP, I referred to the CCP; Chinese Communist Party.
    2
  29.  @Векычо  No worries, my Russian language skills are less than a 2 year old. :}
    2
  30. No, it will take weeks if not months. This is because the Chinese win want to grind Taiwan into the dirt with stand off weapons first. They must have a successful beach landing to win, the Taiwanese will be seeking to massacre Chinese soldiers on the beach. Once that happens China will implode, fallout from the one child policy.
    2
  31. Welcome to the thunder dome.
    2
  32. In before the "Deus vult!" Memes. Those crusaders are obsessed with taking back istanbul and renaming it to Constantinople. 🤣🤣🤣
    2
  33. So much for Russia running out of money and ammunition back in march eh? Russia is a world power for many reasons, this war proves that.
    2
  34. Portugal needs more people!!
    2
  35. Si vis pacem, parabellum.
    1
  36.  Nick Bennett  is it because the frigates have too much complexity to manage?
    1
  37. North Korea using nukes will be the last thing they ever do as the USA will turn that peninsula to glass after it launches its own volley.
    1
  38.  @SuperGeronimo999  until they start firing cruise missiles to your vicinity. The USA military uses force projection to implement opponents because it is the only country that can do so. Not so much the Chinese. The Russians don't have the capacity.
    1
  39.  @Kayzef2003  I said "in China" everything is fake and it is true for the most part. The Chinese have this obsession with saving face.
    1
  40.  @techcroz4060  Asian bond means nothing to nazi CCP who already bully all neighbours and carry out genocide on tibetans, Mongols, Uighur, etc. Even the Philippines will jump at the chance to smack CCP China when the opportunity comes knocking.
    1
  41. Imagine it firing tungsten rods from low earth orbit!! : 0
    1
  42. You say that because you are from a small country with smaller things to worry about. When you have an empire you gotta think big. Poverty and starvation will never be eliminated only mitigated. Now walk softly and carry a big gun, this is Thunderdome.
    1
  43.  098765 Craper  Which can always be repaired by the engineers. Again, assuming you can hit it. The defensive cordon including AEGIS destroyers can take over direct and guide missiles towards targets, ballistic missiles included, if detected in time. The same goes for the use of ECM and ECCM to spoof the location of ships who can deploy them and be long gone before said missile gets anywhere close. ;] China also cannot manufacture the chips needed without importing them. As mentioned before, they are 20 years behind in that technology; they latest missiles require much more recent semi conductor chips than anything made in the year 2000.
    1
  44.  @w0mblemania  And as I said to the other guy, that is if you can hit it. Carriers are miles deep in defensive cordons protected by Frigates and AEGIS destroyers, notwithstanding AWACs and the point defense systems of the carrier itself. Also don't count out the use of ECM and ECCM defensive systems in place to fool incoming attacks.
    1
  45.  @redstwok1123  China maintains to this day that only 4,000 people have died to covid. China has 1.4 billion people, the USA has 330 million and has suffered 220K deaths and still counting. You honestly want us to believe that China, a corrupt country run by communist gangstas whom excel at lying (so much so that this virus became a pandemic in the first place) aren't lying about people dying in China? If Xi is confident that china beat the virus back in March why are entire regions and cities still being locked down to this day and the testing of millions of chinese people being ordered? Please miss me with your sycophantic thinking. You already sound like a wumao.
    1
  46. What makes you think that the US won't attack the dams?
    1
  47.  @hananokuni2580  true, they would most likely drain them in advance prior to the conflict breaking out.
    1
  48. All this assumes that CCP China doesn't start some sh!t in the far east. ^^
    1
  49. The UN is being controlled by China, be happy that Trump is USA president.
    1
  50. Considering the genocidal antics and corruption of the CCP, I would rather stay with the USA.
    1
  51. What if China simply goes through Nepali territory? Nepal is a vassal state and I don't trust CCP China to not take advantage of that point of entry.
    1
  52. But those aren't always guaranteed though.
    1
  53. Look up the amount of people thar died on the Vietnamese side.
    1
  54.  @mgagapaz6801  I don't think they would fare well today, whereas America won't risk ground attacks this time they will spend a great deal flattening Vietnam from the air. The b52 stratosphere fortresses will see to that. Nevermind dropping MOABs on other points of interests. The idea today would be to destroy infrastructure and army assets to collapse the government economically. Nevermind all the cruise missles that can be directed towards targets via satellite. The allied massacre of iraqi ground troops in the gulf war proves that sheer numbers of soldiers mean nothing if your troops don't have air support
    1
  55.  @morrisblanco4245  haha, to what exactly? Recall that these planes are flying in the stratosphere well above what normal interceptor jets can reach and engage in, plus they are jam packed with flares and chaff countermeasures against incoming missiles.
    1
  56.  @morrisblanco4245  Yah, but is the SS-400 designed to hit aerial moving targets? Never underestimate B52 flying stratosphere fortresses either buddy. ;]
    1
  57. At this rate I'd rather just keep buying F15s and F16s. The F18, F22 and F35s behave like disaster cases. All just randomly crashing. They all seem like a waste of cash.
    1
  58. This is pretty much kicking off now!
    1
  59. They are.
    1
  60. They need one failed beach landing to cause a riot in China. The one child policy is still in effect.
    1
  61. It is what it is. Don't stop believing. 😄👍
    1
  62. Argentina needs to let go of socialism.
    1
  63. Remember that Binkov may talk about hypothetical wars, but only real peace can bring us all together. 😊
    1
  64.  @jakemocci3953  that's less than 2% of elite, competent sailors. Like it or not the US Navy made the USA a naval power
    1
  65. Not really, they feinted the Kiev attack to pull most of the Ukraine army away from the east, which is what the war is about, the liberation of the Donbass. Mariupol belongs to Russia now, they have a land bridge from Crimea to the Russian border now they will smash the east flank to secure Donbass.
    1
  66. @Yuzhe Tian They may be trained, but they are not loyal. The PLA fights for the CCP, not the people. As such you can incite civil war in the army if the right condition allows for it.
    1
  67. Oscar, you are a liar, Trump never said any of that.
    1
  68.  @oscarmendez590  i find it stupid to say trump didn't respect the troops when he is actively trying to pull them out of war zones. You people disgust me with your lies.
    1
  69. Again, what stops the CCP from going through mongolia? They pretty much control it by proxy.
    1
  70.  @fredsaga3708  the USA has more carrier battlegroup fleets than any nation on the planet. There's always 6 of them moving while 3 are held in reserves, none of their carriers travel alone. Let that sink in.
    1
  71. Welcome to Thunderdome.
    1
  72.  @HassanalBolkiahSoyjak  you forget the part where the Taliban were BTFO'd for twenty years. You think your country can do the same? Yeah, didn't think so.
    1
  73. Is Argentina a socialist country?
    1
  74. Because they are made by the communist Chinese?
    1
  75. Welcome to Thunderdome.
    1
  76.  @josephroach711  greater than both world war costs the USA took part in combined. 🤣
    1
  77.  @cbot375  so you are totally ignoring CCP China's antics? Russia's economy is almost the same as pre covid-19 New York. They cannot afford any of the stuff you are spouting. China has been stealing from the United States for years never mind influencing senators in Congress and you didn't even ping that. You should change your news sources buddy boyo, you sound clueless.
    1