ThatHandsomeDevil08
Forbes Breaking News
comments
Comments by "ThatHandsomeDevil08" (@thathandsomedevil0828) on "Arkansas Governor Heckled After Explaining There Is Zero Evidence Covid Vaccines Cause Infertility" video.
8
3
@Frostbite08 In other words you got caught out in your lack of understanding what mRNA "vaccines" are so you resorted to putting words in my mouth to discredit everything I just said. The fact that you literally made up a quote from what I said proves to me that you are a vile human being. You literally accused me of copying and pasting my previous response but cannot even manage to copy my exact statement to counter my recent argument. Very desperate attempt at bad mouthing don't you think?
I am also not impressed by you swinging your job title at me, academic prowess is no substitute for common sense and you just proved that in spades. If you truly were a scientist of any sort you would look into every name and source I mentioned to see if those sources say actually made sense but you are instead trying to lord over me with some ridiculous notion of having a certain job title and that you don't have time to counter any of the arguments I made. Well le me break it down for you sunny, you cannot refute any of my arguments because they are true and your ego prevents you from admitting that defeat, please take that "L" and go have a glass of water.
Again, go look at the covid blog Mr. Science man, people are already dying of the mRNA shot. Last time I checked this was at 45,000 in the USA alone and past 18,000 in Europe. Add to that every other entry into the VAERS system reporting injuries from the shot, how can you honestly tell anyone that the mRNA shot isn't anything but poison. EVEN DR ROBERT MALLONE, inventor of the mRNA technology has already expressed caution in wide deployment of the tech in a vaccine format. In a conversation with Bret Weinstein of the Dark Horse Podcast, it was surmised that the spike protein itself is TOXIC to humans, so how can you say that it isn't poison? Dude, you claim you are some hot shot medical lab scientist but I see no evidence of that position here. Sounds to me like you are bloody clueless about how mRNA "vaccines" really work.
2
1
1
@Frostbite08 Hey hey hey, not so fast mr scientist. If VAERS isn't reviewed so why does it exist? Are you somehow trying to negatively discount any and all honest entries made in the data base? Please provide links and sources to whom ever said Dr. Hoffe was lying. Note, I never mentioned any death statistics when I quoted his findings only that he theorized that every single recipient of the mRNA shots will die of heart failure within the next 3 years due to pulmonary arterial hypertension. So yeah, let's go; show me what you got.
And also this, because I simply cannot trust anything you say. You accuse others of lying but are lying through your teeth as well:
Dr. Malone is the inventor of mRNA vaccines (and DNA vaccines). He also discovered lipid mediated and naked RNA transfection technologies.
It all started when he was at the Salk Institute in 1987 and 1988. There, he pioneered in-vitro RNA transfection and also in-vivo RNA transfection (in frog embryos, as well as mice).
This resulted in his seminal paper: Cationic liposome-mediated RNA transfection RW Malone, PL Felgner, IM Verma. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) 86 (16), 6077-6081
His filed patent and disclosures from the Salk included in-vivo RNA transfection and also methods for mRNA stabilization - *now being claimed as invented by others*. These are available for review.
His research was continued at Vical in 1989, where the first in-vivo mammalian rat experiments were designed by him. The mRNA, constructs, reagents were developed at the Salk institute and at Vical by Dr. Malone, this included dosing amounts for the in-vivo experiments. RNA and DNA were sent to Dr. Jon Wolff via Fedex. Dr.Wolff at the University of Wisconsin injected mice and rats. The initial patent disclosures for RNA and DNA vaccination were written by Dr. Malone in 1988-1989. Dr. Malone was also an inventor of DNA vaccines in 1988 and 1989.
This body of work resulted in over 10 patents and numerous publications, yielding about 7000 citations for this work. The paper was the first showing data for DNA and RNA side by side for in-vivo (the first paper for in-vivo DNA):
Direct gene transfer into mouse muscle in vivo. Wolff JA, Malone RW, et al. Science. 1990;247(4949 Pt 1):1465-8. Cited in 4,750 articles, is the result of that work.
In 1989, research was performed that gave rise to the 10+ groundbreaking patents on mRNA vaccination, all with a priority date of March 3, 1989. This is the same priority date as the Salk Patent application, showing that the two institutions were working together (without Robert’s knowledge). These patents are the first published research on mRNA vaccination. The titles and links to the patents are listed in the documents below. These patents have proof of principle experiments on mRNA vaccines - that clearly document that the invention worked and that these are the first experiments showing this.
Vical was to license the Salk Technology. Instead, they hired Robert’s thesis advisor from the Salk and soon after, the Salk dropped the patent and Vical never pursued a license from the Salk. Due to an employee contract with Vical, this stopped Robert from working in the field commercially for a decade. Vical claimed all the Salk research happened at Vical and sent a cease and desist letter.
Dr. Malone carried on his research into mRNA vaccination during the 1990s, culminating in a mucosal patent that was issued in 2000. He also helped revolutionized the field of cationic liposomes for the use in RNA vaccinations. This work was so far ahead of its time, that only now is the world turning to mucosal mRNA vaccination as a method of immunization. For a listing of some of his work, see the publications at the end of this page.
Scientifically trained at UC Davis, UC San Diego, and at the Salk Institute Molecular Biology and Virology laboratories, Dr. Malone received his medical training at Northwestern University (MD) and Harvard University Medical School (Clinical Research Post Graduate) , and in Pathology at UC Davis, He has almost 100 peer-reviewed publications, and has been an invited speaker at about 50 conferences.
1
@Frostbite08 hahaha, here come the ad hominems and insults because of a lack of counter arguments. But my question still stands, why are you so quick to discount the entries of VAERS? Because it doesn't gel with your world view? You prove to all of us on this thread that up until I checked you on it you had no clue as to how mRNA vaccines work, why do you feel you can understand better than actual victims suffering from the mRNA shots that their accounts are false?
The CDC describes VAERS as: "... the nation's early warning system that monitors the safety of vaccines after they are authorized or licensed for use by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). VAERS is part of the larger vaccine safety system in the United States that helps make sure vaccines are safe. The system is co-managed by CDC and FDA." So what does it even matter if they are reviewed or not? Do you think people actually take time out of their busy days to log false entries into the system? So we should ignore actual accounts of people suffering because of VAERS is "not reviewed"? Pray tell then mr hot shot scientist what other system is available to the public to log their accounts of adverse effects following vaccine treatment? You have failed to provide any counter arguments and answers to any of my claims so far, I am still waiting for legit counter arguments from you, I bet we can insult each other all day but we are having a discussion so please bring your receipts to the table. I bet that as a medical lab scientist you should be made of sterner stuff, come on then let's have it.
And yeah, I copied the exact literature from Dr. Malone's website as it actually makes sense and lays the timeline of his invention of mRNA tech. Please find a counter argument to his work and claims if you can, I am also waiting for this. Truth be told, in addition to being vile you are proving to be pathetic. Please provide the receipts, I cannot honestly believe you are a medical lab scientist. LOL!!!!
1
1