Comments by "Lautaro Quiroga" (@LautaroQ2812) on "" video.

  1. That would in turn make it that software not free. Or only "technically free". Also, if the software was made by more than 1 person, they should be in as a "group" to which you'd have to pay. And that doesn't happen all the time that there's a structured legal collective of the developers where there's 1 assigned person on which, should you earn money for your software, you "trust" this person to do their job on paying everyone else. This is an L take in my opinion.
    2
  2. I disagree with the DRM and anticheat thing because if you think about it, we already have cheaters. Massive cheater problem. So I'd much rather not have DRM hurting performance in games and anti cheats being stupid. Louis, if you told my mother she can only install Windows on her laptop, she'd say "oh, ok". Not because she doesn't care, but because she doesn't know. She does not know how to click an X to close out the image viewer on Bing, despite her being able to intubate you to save your life with her eyes closed. It's ironically funny. Also, why not just call it "FUTO License" if the license for "commercially allowed open source" doesn't currently exist? Just put the name of the company since you're the ones creating it? Telegram gained market because it was FREE no paid anything before and it worked super well, it had many features that WhatsApp didn't have and even the ones that both had, Telegram sometimes had it better. Same for stickers, etc. Nowadays, at least for us here, Telegram audio messages take ages to load/download amongst other problems and you have all the premium paid features. Also, in the beginning, people believed Telegram to be "Good and secure", more than "the evil WhatsApp owned by Facebook/Meta" but in reality it's not really.
    1