Comments by "Lautaro Quiroga" (@LautaroQ2812) on "Asmon on Charlie's Situation" video.

  1.  @harbhub  Not really. Killing 1 (innocent) person vs killing 6 million are both terrible things. Both wrong, NO DISCUSSION on that objective point. But to say they're equally the same it's stupid. Because in reverse, but with the same logic, we could say: It doesn't matter if the 2 police officers in Nashville saved a lot of more people who potentially could've died, some still died so it's awful! - It is, especially kids, it is awful. My example goes on the point of removing certain contextual value (positive or negative) to things, because they stem from the same place or are similar. I don't think what you said, and what I said, are exclusive things to each other. Even though Fansly is a porn site (we know it), the "ad" showcases "creators". I know this is BS, but technically, that's what it is. What they create, comes afterwards. But going straight to a video, on stream, of a girl getting railed by a BBC is not the same. The shock value, especially to kids, is much much different. I'll give you another example: Let's say you're a responsible parent, but you can't control your child (and don't want to, because that's bad) 24/7, and at some point he comes to you and says "dad, what's fansly? There are creators there. I'd like to see their vids". As a father you can look it up and then say, no son, that's not a good site. Just stick to Twitch. There's a small layer of defense for the children there, at least. But the same kid, being on Kick because he found Adin to be "a funny guy" suddenly watching said video... there's no real response time. The mind of that kid is now gone for 1 or 2 years (forward) where they will do whatever to get there again and watch (and learn, in a sense) everything. I think both you and OP are correct: Both things are bad, and both should be forbidden, while at the same time acknowledging that one is much more direct and worse than the other.
    1