Comments by "Lautaro Quiroga" (@LautaroQ2812) on "TheQuartering"
channel.
-
2
-
2
-
I like how their idea of offensive never crosses their mind for themselves.
"Oh my god, a woman who heals everything or the one in a skirt?"
I could say "Oh my god, a hot sexy female burglar in a leather suit that acts as a feline like the girls on pornhub with a tail buttplug in their ass who are submissive?".
Also, Pattinson's best character was Cedric in Harry Potter and I am sad he keeps having these weird stupid roles because I truly think he is actually a good actor. And the fact he knows his FF7 shit (which I personally don't, I don't care about FF) is mad respectable.
Edit: Also, hot take here: People who keep saying "oh poor Zoe, she's rich, who cares?" are doing the same thing in the opposite way as she does. You are invalidating any of their experiences because they were born sons or daughter of X or Y. Grow the fuck up.
I'm NOT saying she should be complaining/blaming like she does. She does sound kind of dumb. She needs to grow the fuck up as well, but I mean, she is a spoiled child, to an extent so you could expect them to be less aware/conscious. But to say that because they had a better life/opportunities than others and/or because they are children of whomever they are not allowed to feel bad, is envious and resentful as well.
Objectively, if someone has 1 dollar more than you, they are richer than you. And so if the number is big, you're putting effectively your subjective value onto it to make it good or bad. If it's 1 dollar it doesn't matter, but if it's 1 million then it does and they can't complain because "they don't know about life". That's stupid. It's as alienating and invalidating as saying that someone poor shouldn't vote or talk about any pressing issue because it's likely they don't know how to manage their money or uneducated. One thing, even if true, is not exclusive (or shouldn't be) of the other.
1
-
1
-
I actually realized today that I can no longer hold him up high. He willingly and knowingly accepted and made Matrix 4.
That is all that needs to be said. The guy didn't need the money, is not like he hasn't been in any movie since 20 years ago. He got the script, he read it, and he said "Oh my, this is fantastic!". Can't give that one for free. Already gave John Wick 3 for free.
Like don't get me wrong, ok? Keanu is a fucking god and I'd take him ANY DAY over almost anyone else, except Denzel Washington.
However, isn't it RIDICULOUS that one guy can "give away" 75 M dollars to "the crew"? That means that one guy earned X much more money than THE WORKING CREW in the movie.
Instead of giving it away, I would've founded my own production company with fair rates for everybody. After all, I could've funded it myself. Of course, he could've kept it all and not given away 1 cent. So it is fucking wholesome, but my point is, that's all it is. A wholesome tale of how Keanu is such a nice person, but doesn't go past that. Doesn't change anything.
1
-
The "slippery slope" is one of the worst arguments ever and mind you, it's actually what the left uses all the time to gaslight people into accepting their things being taken away when they don't like it.
You have idiots afterwards on tv saying "I held in my hands an AR15, powerful as a tank!".
And what "it represents" is also a terrible argument. COD, BF, Counter-Strike represent and more shooter games, represent WAR. If representation was an actual problem, then Mortal Kombat, FPS games, Assassins Creed, The Division and MORE games would not be (or "shouldn't be") available at all. We could only have sports games and games like crossing whatever of you being a little onion head on Nintendo graphics picking up seeds.
I LOVE the new CS graphics and sounds. When you hit them in the head with a bullet, it goes SQUISH and it's just freaking fantastic. It feels genuinely awesome and rewarding to hit your shots. Does that mean that I love shooting up people or would love to blow their heads? No. So does that mean that having a pronoun selection in game means that 50% of the playerbase will suddenly be trans or something like that? Also no.
The problem isn't the "immersion breaking" of the pronouns. The problem is they can't just go past something so insignificant to their lives that they complain. Immersion breaking and actualy complaint would be talking to 4 or 5 different NPCs, in the same ship, and they ALL look exactly the same and have the same voice. THAT is immersion breaking.
Both sides are worse than children, equally immature but with different expectations due to being adults.
Edit: Unrelated, but fuck that POS fake as fuck dickhead of a gaslighting commie Hasan. And that's all the time he will get from me for this next month.
Edit#2: Actually related - I just remembered the whole Hogwarts Legacy thing. Your arguments now go in towards the "defense" of people being bothered by a pronouns list and leftists (as they always do because they're shit) throwing a tantrum about said people. Let's not forget (which for a second I just did) about months ago on the release of wizard game being a massive meltdown for the other group and everyone saying "bro it's a good game just get it! don't pay att to this bs! Who cares if it gives money to JK Rowling?". And then they also included a trans woman, owner of the bar, inside the game. And I'm sure there were also gay characters. But even then, the left decided to torch it. Most of the community, not all. Like I said, when you get to talk to them (gay, trans, etc) some of them are actually very cool, good and fucking based, conscious of stuff. They don't try to shape up reality to their imagination.
At the end of the day, we had similar situations, with 2 different games, months apart in the same year. As you can see, both sides are equally ridiculous and stupid. And if what I'm saying bothers you or you think I'm defending one side in favor against the other, you should rethink where you're at.
1
-
1
-
EDIT: Also, you mention about CoD not granting him a code. The doc has a link for turtle headphones, I clicked on it, and it took me to a 404 page. However on the "influencers" part, he still appears on the page. So Idk if maybe that's just a mistake or is related.
I wish they would be more lax or contextual in situations like this. Like you ban a person, they can't "use" the platform as a streamer and that's fine, but then not letting others? If you suspect or can find out there is use of "3rd party" (2nd streamer) making the stream for the banned one, then sure, enforce the policies. But making it so FAR to remove them entirely even remotely, only gives someone like Doc more power. Which I love, by the way. I can't love the 2 time is able to spill all the beans, if he ever can.
They could get away with a lot of content creators that are not so big, but the Doc is THE DOC. He's too big to just cut him away and try to prevent him from appearing nowhere near the stuff. All companies would have to "kill him" (metaphorically) to try to make it happen and even then, he's already the doc. It's like caging a wild animal.
1
-
1