Comments by "zjeee" (@zjeee) on "Al Jazeera English" channel.

  1.  @kaitoshinichi  Yeah... I thought I was a lazy student in Chemistry but at least I managed to grasp the basics that there are 118 elements lol.
    18
  2.  @khoontan-l2c  Because Tritium is the most concerning one. The rest are fine. Also there are only 118 elements in the world that we know of, only 37 of those are radioactive. Stop spreading nonsense.
    10
  3. Oh, when did the UN and US complain about China dumping nuclear waste water into the ocean? I did not see that please link me the source,
    10
  4. It’s embarrassing for the Iraqi government that they cannot guarantee the safety of foreign embassies on their territory. Probably not an ideal country for business if the government cannot even guarantee safety of embassies.
    8
  5.  @hanshengz4291  I was responding to Terrytang his message indicated the UN and the US had complained about China releasing nuclear waste water and they had double standards not doing the same to Japan so I just asked him to tell me when the UN and the US complained about China releasing nuclear waste water. I am not speaking for anyone, perhaps you should improve your reading comprehension before making assumptions. Have a nice day.
    5
  6. Obviously they are, they don't like the occupiers of their territory.
    4
  7. Tritium has a 12.33 year half-time. The longer they take to release it the less it will be.
    4
  8.  @Lamin_G  I don't need a lawyer to tell me what the IAEA report says, it's readily available on their website and it's in English - I have read it myself. On the very first page it says: the effects on the environment and people are expected to be negligible. I don't doubt Mr. Gao's intelligence it's just if there is something wrong with my body I go to the hospital to see a doctor, not a plumber. My point is his profession doesn't invalidate his claims but at the end of the day he is a lawyer discussing nuclear science, I would have liked to see a nuclear scientist as a guest talking about the risk. I would have expected more scientists to step forward and say it's not safe, not just Chinese scientists but surely if this is such dangerous thing there would be scientists from all over the world speaking out. This is not even making the news outside of Asia.
    3
  9.  @ddzhou3630  just because you are against it doesn't mean it's fine spreading false information. If you think it's a bad thing you can explain it using facts that are real instead of making things up so it sounds more scary.
    3
  10.  @jutswheezie  Well if the US did not care they would not be the top UN donor by miles. But perhaps you are right - maybe it's time the US stopped caring and withdrew all funding.
    3
  11. There is 8400g of Tritium in the Pacific ocean, there is 3g Tritium in the Fukushima wastewater. If you are concerned about it you should never have fed seafood to your son in the first place.
    3
  12. Why would I respect the faith that says I am an infidel for not sharing it's belief?
    3
  13.  @TagmatonDomestikon  Solely responsible for both world wars? Did you miss history class how the first world war started?
    3
  14. Science is never 100% sure of anything, as new research develops new thoughts are adapted and old ones discarded. The world used to be flat now it's not, science changes all the time.
    2
  15.  @shinkouhai919  There is 8400g Tritium in the pacific Ocean and there is less than 3g Tritium in the wastewater at Fukushima. Also it will be released gradually over 30 years and tritium has a half-life of 12.33 years. These are all facts that you can easily find yourself online, I totally respect and understand people are worried but 3g of tritium in a pacific ocean that already has 8400g over 30 years doesn't sound like a big difference to me. But hey I am just a random guy on the internet and not a scientist.
    2
  16.  @duncankowable  That's a lot of keywords man I am not sure I can remember all of them. The only keywords I remembered from reading the report was "discharge will have a negligible impact on people and the environment." That was all I was interested in.
    2
  17.  @Lamin_G  I guess we see what we want to see, I personally like Terran don't understand why there was a lawyer there, I suppose he was supposed to argue to legality of the whole situation but he ended up discussing the science and he clearly had not much to input, wasting time talking about Carbon-14. Even High schoolers know the human body contains carbon-14 and is naturally occurrent in all agricultural products. Perhaps for you this was a move of brilliance for me it was pointless, anyone that has studied Chemistry knows C-14 is not a concern here, Tritium is the serious and harmful element that we need to be careful about.
    2
  18.  @golahacodbixiyahaxortaah8843  Yeah by the way this is going it will be demolished, perhaps that's for the best.
    2
  19. Because they don't want to pay - they like to talk about support but they love their money more than than their Muslim brothers.
    2
  20.  @eugenetong8749  It's their fishing industry that will suffer reputational and economical damage, Chinese people have boycotted Japanese product at one time or another they are used to it, not the first time.
    2
  21. He retired from politics after he lost his re-election.
    2
  22. Oh you guys have been persecuting religious minorities for centuries and now you want us to care about other people treating you bad?
    2
  23. It sounds like it's time for you to step up, fill the void.
    2
  24. So basically the whole world except China then lol?
    2
  25. I don't like taxes but as a taxpayer I can confidently say I am proud to be a supporter of funding Himars systems in Ukraine.
    2
  26. Well said, I totally agree. Why do we have to send funds to people that hate our guts?
    2
  27. So let me get this straight, the nations that cannot even beat Israel that they outnumber 1000 to 1 is going to take on Europe? Let's see how that goes LOL.
    2
  28. Woah relax bud going from killing a terrorist to attacking the UN? That's quite a few steps between those two, relax won't happen. This is just every day kind of stuff down in the Middle East. Terrorists and counter-terrorists playing cat and mouse game.
    2
  29. So I should respect a holy book that claims I as a non-believer is an infidel? Nah sorry, respect is earned.
    2
  30. Yes it's true they have no more space to store it and none of their neighbours wants to help them store more or provide funds to build new storage facilities and with IAEA saying it's safe the option to release it into the ocean makes most sense to them I guess.
    2
  31. Sources please, the Korean government has said it's okay, so has Australia. Which countries are you talking about. China, yes but that's only one.
    2
  32.  @mailhanyi  He mentioned countries not individuals, there are concerned individuals everywhere that doesn't mean the country disagrees. Just because there were protests by individuals in Korea doesn't mean that Korea as a country disagrees. In fact the Korean government has stated Korea's support of the release. If you are going to claim a country disagrees then I'd expect to see an official statement from the government of said country condemning the move. So far I've seen the Chinese government making such statements but that's it. Perhaps it's a matter of definition but I do find it misleading when you claim a country is against it when said country's government has officially stated support. There will always be individual concern of course I am not saying all Koreans are cool with it but as a country their official stance is dictated by their government and they have said they are cool with it.
    2
  33.  @fluseint.1303  Georgia? Chechnya? Ukraine? Moldova?
    2
  34. I think you are overthinking it, he is talking about China because the Chinese government has condemned Japan for how they release the wastewater. The Korean public is not happy but the Korean government supports Japan's action. So far there are only two national governments that has said this is bad and that is China and Russia. Other countries some of the population is unhappy but the government has not made such statements.
    2
  35. Didn't the woman say China and Korea also release radioactive wastewater into the ocean, shall every Korean and Chinese drink that water too then? Maybe they can all do it together?
    2
  36.  @edward3190  The IAEA has said they have people there on site to monitor the release, there is no reason to believe they don't have access to monitor and test the waters themselves.
    1
  37. Next tiktok trend for sure
    1
  38. Yes they took the life support away from Gaza, hopefully the Arab nations can help their brothers and sisters instead of relying on the West which they hate so much.
    1
  39. How can IAEA be sure about something they have never experienced? Because Tritium has been released into the ocean for a long time. There is 8400g of Tritium in the pacific ocean already and less than 3g in Fukushima wasterwater. Did you even listen to the facts presented or did you just click the video to argue online?
    1
  40.  @wwbren  It does, the nuclear watch dog with the most prominent experts and scientists in the field will be on site to make sure everything is done correctly. Would you rather we let 5 monkeys be in charge of it instead? Or maybe you are the kind of person that goes to the Zoo when you need a surgery? If they are going to do it might as well do it correctly and have a third party present.
    1
  41. the IAEA is a part of the UN, they have no authority. Did you think Putin stopped his invasion of Ukraine when the UN said stop? The UN cannot really do much, they can say what they like and don't like but that's about it.
    1
  42. ​ @Ace-zm4tb  I suppose it comes down to trust then, you apparently claim the Japanese government are not well known for how they deal with things. I don't share that opinion, where I am from we have no problem with the Japanese, sure they did horrible things in WW2 but so did the Germans and we get along with them just fine. I do however have the experience living in China for extended periods of time so I do know where that sentiment comes from. I am not Chinese though so I don't share that resentment or distrust. Sure the government could have covered something up, nothing is impossible but the Japanese are the first line of people to get exposed to the consequences so I doubt it. Maybe I am in the minority but I don't find their solution to dump it into the ocean weird at all, the IAEA has set protocols for how to safely discharge nuclear waste water into the ocean for a reason, because it's common practice for nations with nuclear powerplants. I would agree I would find it odd if Japan were the first nation in history to do so but truth is it's already common practice to dump nuclear wastewater into the ocean, hence why there is already 8400g of Tritium in the pacific ocean because the nations around the ocean have been dumping it already for decades. Is there a possibility there are other substances present? Sure, but that is also a possibility for every case of every nation doing so and we have been allowing them to do so for decades. Also I don't believe the IAEA would allow it should they find a problem with it, they are on-site 24/7 monitoring the release if they have no issues with it then I am assuming it's all safe and in good order just like every other nation doing the same with their Nuclear wastewater.
    1
  43.  @wenerjy  What do you mean what about the 300.000 tons released from the initial Fukushima failure? You mean the natural disaster? Who shall I blame, god?
    1
  44. They also said Japan is following all safety protocols and it's safe, in the same report might I add.
    1
  45. Trust me most people will stop consuming as much "sea products" from that ocean, no matter who fishes them. The water is shared, just because the fisherman catching the fish is not Japanese doesn't mean the fish is "clean".
    1
  46.  @toni-xz6dd  We have ethics, morality and humanity. That's why we side against Hamas the terrorist org. If you want to support them go send them a donation.
    1
  47. Lol nuke someone for burning paper LOL
    1
  48. depends who you ask, ask a muslim it's idf ask a non muslim its Hamas
    1
  49. Of course, they do it all the time. It won't be the first time they boycott Japanese products.
    1
  50. Well at least they were nuclear experts and not lawyers like the other guy LOL.
    1
  51. ISIS already tried, they failed.
    1
  52.  @asyraafmustaqim90yearsago20  Palestine is not a country.
    1
  53.  @leakim650  If what you said is true then why is Israel winning? Surely if there is a god and it is almighty then it would not allow Israel to win if what you said is true. So either you are wrong or god simply does not care for the petty conflicts over who's pretend god is the coolest.
    1
  54.  @mansooralt  Don't bite the hand that feeds you. the west sends billions of dollars each year. Arab nations send a good luck card.
    1
  55. Then why didn't they offer to help Japan store some of that water. Isn't the whole reason of the release into the ocean because their storage capacity is already full? Why not send a team of workers to build a new storage facility for them?
    1
  56. Save money, it's much cheaper to release the water and let the ocean dilute it than run it through a plant or factory to dilute it slowly over time.
    1
  57. There are 3g of Tritium in the Fukushima waste water. The pacific Ocean already contains 8400g. The 3g Tritium in Fukushima will be released over 30 years. It really won't make a big difference.
    1
  58.  @peterwu9648  Yasuhiro Sonoda drank it in 2011 after it was diluted and made drinkable. Keyword here is Diluted.
    1
  59. Yep people keep saying the west is all propaganda and then they take everything Hamas says without any critical thinking whatsoever. Whenever you read "Palestinian officials say" then you know for sure it's Hamas and you need to be mindful the information is biased. Hamas has full control of whatever comes out of the Palestinian government in Gaza, they are the government in Gaza.
    1
  60. Yes the almighty god cannot handle somebody burning paper.. sure. Sounds very Almighty.
    1
  61.  @bilalrandhawa3332  Well unfortunately for the Palestinians this type of behaviour won't end well, pretty much the whole of the west sides with Israel and they will retaliate, hard with toys supplied by the west. Good luck guys you asked for it.
    1
  62. Norway has no nuclear powerplants though so they don't have to worry about that.
    1
  63. Some of them did, the result was the Abraham Accords Peace Agreement
    1
  64. Worth it
    1
  65. ​ @therensdns31415  I am not saying there aren't more elements out there that we haven't discovered yet just saying that trying to claim there are 200+ radioactive elements in the water when we only know 118 elements in existence and only 37 of them are radioactive is just spreading fear and misinformation on purpose. With your way of reasoning we could all claim there are millions of radioactive elements in the water because "theoretically" there could be. I suppose there could also be a dinosaur in the water because theoretically I am sure there could be creatures around that we cannot see with our human eye or perhaps because we can create new species in labs so we cannot rule the possibility out. If you want to be an apologist for the unnecessary spread of fear and misinformation that's fine by me, don't just expect the rest of us to swallow it whole hook and sink.
    1
  66. Why do you expect Israel, us and it's allies to fund their enemies?
    1
  67.  @floppydisk9541  Yeah bad PR for the west. Top 20 donors only 3 countries are not from the West 17 are from the west. South Africa donated $171,600 Compare that to the us $345,000,000 yeah very bad PR. I think if anything this shows us who has been supporting the Palestinians all these years, the west. South Africa and the Arab nations send words, the west sends $$$. I wonder if you can eat words, that's what they will get now when the West does not send money anymore.
    1
  68.  @ddzhou3630  You see this is why nobody takes you seriously "the character of Japanese people". Japanese people did not decide to release the water, their government did, a lot of Japanese are against their government in this. But you are showing that your resentment and hatred of Japanese people, as soon as I see that I know your thoughts are fuelled by your emotional hatred of the Japanese and not in rationality. Nobody is going to take you seriously when you insert your resentment in your arguments like that, it's pretty clear you debate from a position of hate rather than facts.
    1
  69. The water is not safe, it will be safe once it's diluted which it will be when you release it into the ocean. I suggest you read up about Chemistry and dilution if you want to know what it is and how it works.
    1
  70. Crazy guess, dealing with the nuclear waste water without releasing it cost a lot more? Was I right?
    1
  71. Sweden has been a bastion for Turkish refugees fleeing Turkish oppression for decades. We have a huge group of Kurds and Christian Turks in Sweden. Turkey does not take care of their minorities very well so we are doing it for them.
    1
  72. Why buy water when you can get tanks and conquer new water sources ^_^?
    1
  73.  @hanifmsomc  Yeah because the US giving 400 million dollars every year themselves would be very angry if others donated too? Fact is Arab nations don't want to help Palestinians.
    1
  74.  @jetterbenne2578  Yeah let's compare Iranian police clamp down to Germany and France LOL your whole point just fell apart with one stupid claim. good job.
    1
  75. Seeing there is a correlation the same people supporting Russia is also supporting Palestine it's pretty obvious why the west won't allow Israel to fall for the same reason we're all rooting for Ukraine. The west has little interest to let Russia expand and to create another terrorist state in the middle east as both of these will lead to our countries being put into danger. You want to pick sides and go against the west? Go for it just don't come crying when you cannot handle us teaming up with your enemies.
    1
  76. Should have thought about that before you guys decided to hunt down all Christians and Jews in the middle east - we could have all lived together but you decided to drive them all away and now you come crying that the Jews are defending themselves like their lives depend on it, because they are. They know the minute they lose they and their family will meet the same fate as all Christians and Jews in Muslim countries in the middle east have. No sympathy for you.
    1
  77. The issue is it's not about the science, the IAEA have already said Japan follows all protocols when releasing water, why are there such protocols in place? Because like you mentioned every country with a nuclear powerplant releases nuclear wastewater. Like you said it's nothing new at all, there is 8400g Tritium in the pacific ocean, the wastewater in Fukushima has less than 3g in total. It's a political issue and it's about fear, the public living around the area there are worried about the consequences which is understandable and from the political side the Chinese government has it's own score to settle with Japan so they are not going to let an opportunity like this go to waste.
    1
  78. They hate us but they love our money.
    1
  79.  @ggbond911.  That's fine by me, cheaper seafood for the rest of us and a chance for the pacific ocean to recover from over-fishing! Thanks.
    1
  80. Not going to happen the US senate, congress and the president realizes that they are the only reliable US ally in the region. Without aid they risk being overrun and replaced by another terrorist state.
    1
  81. Because they are religious fanatics living in countries where it's normal to kill people that say things they don't like.
    1
  82. Don't compare a terrorist organisation to a national Army that's very disrespectful to the Ukrainian army. Hamas did not say one word about the Russian invasion of Ukraine, they don't care about other people's fight for freedom if it's their friends doing the occupation.
    1
  83.  @riccardo9383  How many Jews live in "Palestine" or it's surrounding Arab nations. How many Christians? Did not think so, since when did Muslim nations care about following international law and human rights in their hunt for infidels? Don't come here crying for support, it's all karma.
    1
  84. Well whatever the Palestinian grievances were they are about to get a lot worse, if you think Hamas can do what 6-7 Arab nations failed to do when they joined forces then you are sorely mistaken. If you go for the king you best not miss, retaliation will be painful.
    1
  85. Will I get in trouble if I download it and put it in the computer trash bin?
    1
  86.  @LoC28C  WTF Al Jazeera US state media? Are you kidding LOL!?
    1
  87. Of course they won't, they are too weak to take on Israel's Allies. If they were strong enough to take on Israel they would have done so a long time ago.
    1
  88. There was already a Japanese PM that drank the water in 2011, Yasuhiro Sonoda.
    1
  89.  @karllin7659  I made a typo I fixed it, I hope you can recover from your anger now :). Thanks for the reminder and have a nice day! Did I earn my 50 cents?
    1
  90. If the Iranians could take down the IDF they would have done so long ago, they don't have the military capacity to do anything and they spend their time training rebels in other countries to do their fighting for them
    1
  91. Yasuhiro Sonoda (Japanese politician) drank it in 2011 to prove it's safe .
    1
  92. They are having a hard time finding a willing successor, they are all afraid they will be next
    1
  93. The lady just said China is dumping 4 times more Tritium in the water than Japan already and the South Koreans 2.5 times more. Didn't you watch the video? they discussed it in the video.
    1
  94.  @jmhorange  All I can see are excuses, why can't you just say they don't want to.
    1
  95. One must not say bad things about islamic terrorists or Al Jazeera will be triggered.
    1
  96. I don't know why are there no Christians and Jews left in the middle east apart from in Israel? That's probably the same reason there can not be any peace, one side won't stop until all "infidels" are gone, driven away of exterminated. They have been systematically driving out religious minorities from the middle east for Centuries.
    1
  97. Carbon-14 you mean the kind that's IN EVERYONE OF US? LOL. Wtf don't you fact check anything you read online? So basically we are all dangerous and radioactive? give me a break.
    1
  98.  @backpackpepelon3867  Yeah it's totally the first time Tritium is being released into the pacific ocean, a whole 3g of it. Let's ignore the fact that the pacific ocean has 8400g tritium already from nations in the area dumping it into the ocean.
    1
  99. It's okay the Russian army is in a worse state they are already ahead of the game before they started their re-armament.
    1
  100. Yep, a nuclear winter for Russia
    1
  101.  @edward3190  On the same page they also clearly stated that the effects on the environment and people will be negligible.
    1
  102.  @ddzhou3630  Again, it's the Japanese government not the Japanese people. I do know you don't like Japanese people but let's try to keep it civil, thanks. You could also say Japan did X/Y/Z. They called the scientists and experts of the IAEA, the experts from IAEA and 11 nations have gone to Japan to Check. Everyone says it's safe so why wouldn't the government trust the scientists?
    1
  103. Why do you care, you chased out all religious minorities from your countries because they were "infidels" now you want us to care about how other people treat you? Forget about it.
    1
  104. We can live without any nation in this world.
    1
  105.  @4061earthabcdesong  I thought the girl in the video was Norwegian, she's not a real expert you say?
    1
  106.  @yvonnemohenry  Tritium is the number one priority for experts, scientists and the IAEA to check because that is the harmful element to watch out for. The IAEA are on site 24/7 monitoring the release. If the top experts and scientists in the world cannot find anything else in the water then nobody can.
    1
  107. Yep, that's the people aligned to the Palestinians and people supporting Palestine also likes the Taliban. And you wonder why the west will not take the side of Palestine when they themselves and their supporters align themselves with the Taliban ^_^. Good luck.
    1
  108.  @thisisprogress6817  Ukraine is around position 40-50 in the world if ranked by military spending Russia is what? top 5? Russia should have been able to run circles around Ukraine within 2 weeks yet they are taking months to take a few KM of territory.
    1
  109. There was a Japanese PM that drank the water in 2011 to prove it's safe.
    1
  110. Well you know the Quran specifically single you out as an infidel though right? The basis of the faith does not respect you so I applaud you for being the better man defending the faith that does not respect you.
    1
  111. Well you nailed it, we are all unbelievers to you so why should we respect the faith that calls us infidels? You don't respect me so why should I care you cry when I don't respect you back. Your god is "almighty" yet he cannot handle burning a few pieces of paper.
    1
  112. lol the ICC make an arrest warrant? That means they will have to do it for every nation that releases nuclear wastewater into the ocean which is every single nation that has an operating nuclear powerplant. The ICC will be very busy arresting half the world's leaders lol.
    1
  113. Paludan has been burning Qurans for years
    1
  114.  @joshmirr7366  If they can beat 6 nations joining forces against them they can take some random cave dwellers out, I wouldn't worry about that.
    1
  115. Disregarding their neighbours that already let tritium out into the ocean from their nuclear powerplants. I mean what would the S. Korean government say, hey I know we let out twice as much Tritium as you have in Fukushima from our own Nuclear powerplant but this is not acceptable, only we are allowed to do it. Also as far as I know only the governments of Russia and China have made official statements condemning the action so far. Australian and Korean governments as an example have said they support the Japanese government's decision. Politically it seems it's mostly China relations that will suffer but those were not that great to begin with, the biggest disaster is the reputation of the Japanese fishing industry, people will be very unwilling to consume Japanese seafood, no matter if it's safe or not for sometime. It's going to hurt the fishing industry severely.
    1
  116. That is 12 so far, still 1200 left accused of being Hamas members then another 6000 of having close family members being Hamas members. It will be a looong investigation. The whole organization is compromised,.
    1
  117.  @PlaYer-sn5or  I am sorry to disappoint you but there was already a Japanese PM that drank it 2011 to prove it's safe and he is still alive. I know this makes you sad but it's true. Yasuhiro Sonoda is his name.
    1
  118. Okay guy with Chinese name, Uighurs? Yeah look at that you have something in common with the US and Europe.
    1
  119.  @staffanlundberg  Good for you, perhaps your country can step up and fill the gap left by the 17 other states leaving. Also why was your country not the largest contributor before the scandal? Sounds like you guys were cheapskates.
    1
  120.  @stephend7002  Yeah I can read, I read the Korean government's official statement on the issue. They supported the release. Why should I drink the water, just because I find it misleading when you make false claims countries are against it when their official government bodies make statements that they support it? So anyone pointing out misleading claims have to drink the water? I see you like logic.
    1
  121. It's not a scientific issue, it's a political issue. Even if the guy agrees 100% with the scientific findings and the IAEA he is not going to support it simply because that is the stance of his government and he needs to toe the line.
    1
  122. What, you mean releasing Tritium into the ocean like they are already doing? Nah surely they would not do what they are already are doing, that makes no sense.
    1
  123. They don't have an emperor anymore, welcome to the 21st century.
    1
  124. Yep there is currently 3g of Tritium in the Fukushima wastewater that's going to be released into the pacific ocean over a span of 30 years. There is currently already 8400g of Tritium in the pacific ocean because the nations around the ocean have been dumping their nuclear wastewater in the ocean for as long as they've had Nuclear powerplants. Tritium has a half-life of 12.33 years so it will eventually disappear. I know it sounds bad but 3g over 30 years when there is already 8400g there, it won't make a big difference.
    1
  125. They won't they are not interested to help, they talk a lot but actually giving money? Bro you are asking too much of them.
    1
  126.  @meeraaldary8439  It's a good thing Israel is preventing AIDS, nobody likes that disease.
    1
  127. Why is it up to Europe to solve the climate change crisis, the biggest polluters are the US, China and India? Europe is already doing more than enough to combat climate change in comparison to the rest of the world.
    1
  128. Better to share it, happiness for more people.
    1