Youtube comments of (@logicaestrex2278).
-
83
-
42
-
32
-
23
-
20
-
16
-
13
-
13
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@ChristoffRevan This is not correct. You are conflating a blocked path with an unreachable destination, you cannot assume that because previous implementations failed, all future ones will, or will have the same results. It is not inherent to the system, unless you can prove it is, and no amount of anecdotes will EVER do that logically speaking. Also, you are incorrect, because that isnt the implication, thats the objective fact. communism is the lack of state, classes, and money. None of the systems in question were communist, they were in fact socialist by definition. That is simply unavoidable, and capitalists love to try and conflate the two by pretending the definition of communism is more nebulous than it really is. Communism hasnt ever been and isnt being exploited by leadership, because its never been implemented. Show me a society that meets the criteria of the definition and was exploited, or stipulate whatever weird definition your using, but those are really your only two options
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1