Comments by "First Last" (@First-Last_name) on "Russia and Ukraine accuse each other of plotting an attack on Zaporizhzhia nuclear plant | DW News" video.

  1. ​ @BRB683 the counter offensive has russians crying on their social media.
    20
  2. The IAEA inspected the ZPP and confirmed there are explosives planted inside the facility. This whole issue is nerve racking. I'm fairly certain Vasha is planning a nuclear terrorist attack 😔
    13
  3.  @davidnoelfranks1124  IAEA confirmed it in November. Look it up vatnik. “Our assessment of those particular placements was that while the presence of any explosive device is not in line with safety standards, the main safety functions of the facility would not be significantly affected. We are following the issue with great attention,” - Grossi, IAEA Director.
    8
  4. ​ @Frank-dv3st not everyone is a soldier. I've been involved in fundraisers though and we've managed to send quite a chunk of medical aid.
    4
  5. ​​​ @gdiwolverinemale3rd nobody told Ukraine not to negotiate. The line is always negotiations are up to Ukraine. Why doesn't vasha withdrawal, and return the children? That would allow for a ceasefire.
    4
  6.  @demurch0  you read too much TASS. What you claim absolutely was not confirmed and is in fact fantasy.
    4
  7.  @BRB683  that has already been reached and breached in some areas 🙄
    2
  8. “Our assessment of those particular placements was that while the presence of any explosive device is not in line with safety standards, the main safety functions of the facility would not be significantly affected. We are following the issue with great attention,” Grossi, director of IAEA.
    2
  9.  @sarahbrown5073  the generators are still hot and require management till they cool. It takes a year or more to shut down properly.
    2
  10. Lest russia forget that pickle jar. The national shame was almost too much to bare😔 (If confused, look up: Babushka takes down russian drone with pickle jar)
    2
  11. ​ @MetallicReg russia would set up artillery beside the plant and shell civilians until ukraine was forced to respond.
    2
  12. ​ @TheGreatGrandDinger appeasement does not make peace in our time...
    2
  13. A lot of nato systems have been held back. Like long range missles, planes, non export variants, etcetera. NATO wasn't in Afghanistan, USA was. Besides the USSR failed in half the time, twice the casualties, then devolved...
    1
  14.  @crude-za  the one russians cry about on social media hunting down all their artillery.
    1
  15.  @Gstyle1  they seem to save Ukranian crews. Unlike t-72 sky turrets. If the cook off doesn't get em the fall will 🤣
    1
  16.  @Gstyle1  you can search it up. "Crew survive direct hit in leopard2" its a common occurrence. Unlike the russian pressure cookers.
    1
  17. Vasha
    1
  18.  @Aleksdv777  can you try again in clear English?
    1
  19.  @Aleksdv777  vasha did nord stream and we all know it. EU payed for gas, then vasha flared the line and never delivered. After weeks of political pressure ru blew the line. russia knew LNG terminals were 6 months away and the EU needed to fill gas stockpiles. The line was on borrowed time and it was his last chance to hurt the west. You are ignorant if you believe anyone other then russia did this. Vasha blew up apartments killing hundreds of russians to seize power in 1999. Bombing a pipeline means nothing to him.
    1
  20. ​​ @peteram9527 as russia blows it up from inside.... You know they have been caught stationing ammunition and artillery in and beside the plant. They have used it as a shield for shelling civilians
    1
  21. That was definitely russia. They blew 2.
    1
  22. ​ @comrade9374 nothing will be left of russia. They are already starting to eat each other.
    1
  23. ​ @kingb3 russia has done that plenty. 1 video of ukraine doing it and you vatniks can't live it down. Move on, the videos old news. How's the moskva? How's it like loosing AA to byraktar?😅
    1
  24.  @crushnevnikita8575  you brought up old videos so I did too. Were having a throw back Wednesday right?
    1
  25.  @buravan1512  coping to a whole new level 🤣
    1
  26. Ignorant. russia invaded in 2014 because he denies Ukranians exist. He believes they are confused russians and wants to assimilate them, exterminate resistance. Appeasement of russia will only bring more war, not peace in our time.
    1
  27. So you like fascism eh?
    1
  28. Well russia already blocked people going to Crimea and started limited evacuation. They are on the brink of loosing the south. If that happens destroying the plant would cripple Ukranian grain supply for a hundred years.
    1
  29. Nord stream 1 you mean, and russia definitely did that. The line was shut down immediately after EU made a payment for gas to be delivered. russia knew LNG terminals were 6 months away and EU needed to fill gas storages. They blew the line to end the political pressure they faced and hurt EU gas prices.
    1
  30. Nice vranyo 😅
    1
  31. Is that why russians cry on social media that their artillery can't attack positions any more. Now they are consumed with counter, counter artillery fighting. They loose a crazy amount of artillery lately. It's so bad russia is about to loose Bakmut. Probably this week.
    1
  32. “Our assessment of those particular placements was that while the presence of any explosive device is not in line with safety standards, the main safety functions of the facility would not be significantly affected. We are following the issue with great attention,” Grossi said. According to Grossi, the nuclear safety and security situation at the Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant is extremely fragile.
    1
  33. Like Chernobyl it will probably melt the ceiling supports and collapse it.
    1
  34.  @katsarosfiat  the explosion was steam that set off an incredibly intense fire. The steam explosion would have been contained had the intense heat not started melting the building. As for this happening now. It wouldn't be as bag, but russia could remove the cooling rods, ensure no power is drawn, and damage the building. We'd have a similar situation then.
    1
  35.  @kvintersvinterz   @kvintersvinterz  the key phrase there is "the main safety functions of the facility would not be significantly effected. So safety would still be compromised if these went off, just not critically.
    1
  36. ​ @bardgold4553 appeasement does not make peace in our time. It breeds more wars.
    1
  37.  @hatchxable  it was reported by civilians living around the power plant on russian media. As well as family members on social media.
    1
  38.  @hatchxable  you do know russia set up artillery beside the plant and shelled civilians until ukraine responded. Then used the plant as a shield. It has been observed by the U.N OHCHR.
    1
  39.  @hatchxable  in response to russia using the plant to shell civilians🙄
    1
  40.  @hatchxable  to stop the shelling and save lives. So far only a few shells directly hit causing superficial damage to roof and walls.
    1
  41. Like when Vladimir bombed apartments killing over 300 russkiyes in 1999, to rise to power?
    1
  42. IAEA confirmed russia planted explosives through out the facility late November.
    1
  43.  @Tony-uk5xb  russia did. It was already shut down and Germanys LNG terminals were 6 months away. They wanted to stop EU from filling gas storages for winter. They waited for EU to pay for gas then never delivered. Knowing it was one of the last few payments the line would ever receive.
    1
  44.  @chukwuemekaokeke6944  lol, those were hilarious claims set up by russia. The supposed plot makes no sense. Why would they rent a yacht connected to a prominent Ukranian. Why leave the boat littered with supposed evidence. You've lost the plot.
    1
  45.  @hatchxable  it came from Hersh a well known kremlin asset. His report also claimed Jens Stoltenberg is a secret communist CIA asset recruited at like 14 🤣
    1
  46. ​ @e4t662 IAEA confirms russia controls the plant and has placed explosives throughout the plant.
    1
  47.  @al_the_crow  they never said it was anti personal mines. They referred to remote triggered explosive devices.
    1
  48.  @Pierluigi_Di_Lorenzo  you must have ignored the IAEA quote I posted where they confirm remote triggered explosives are in the plant.
    1
  49.  @Pierluigi_Di_Lorenzo  you are cherry picking bits and ignoring others to construct a false narrative comrade. The vranyo is strong with you. "However, the IAEA is aware of previous placement of mines outside the plant perimeter, which the Agency has previously reported, and also at particular places inside"
    1
  50.  @Pierluigi_Di_Lorenzo  I'm not using old facts. I just quoted you the latest report. Read it and don't omit such facts. If you blindly toe the kremlin line you are a vatnik 🤷‍♂️
    1
  51.  @MetallicReg  then russia should stop using the plant as a base to shell civilians. Ukraine can let only so many civilians die before they must respond to the source
    1
  52.  @MetallicReg  U.N. OHCHR has confirmed the ZPP is used to directly target civilians. Under the suspension it is to goat a response so russia can cause an incident. How can you still pretend russia doesn't commit daily war crimes? Turkey recently interviewed 89 civilians released to neutral ground from detention. 91% reported torture. Most including men were graped, and 5 were children all who were graped. Source U.N OHCHR.
    1
  53.  @demurch0  I Don't watch CNN or BBC. russian TASS and mod have claimed to down the entire Ukranian air force over 4x. That's not reality. Its a vranyo fueld fantasy. Keep living in dream land vatnik. It will be a rude awakening 😉
    1
  54. How about the director of the IAEA?
    1
  55. IAEA director confirms russia planted explosives inside.
    1
  56. If only the airport wasn't servicing military planes....
    1
  57. Winnie the pooh: "Now bend over, this bear wants to dip into your honey pot" Vasha: "yes daddy"
    1