Comments by "First Last" (@First-Last_name) on "How the GLSDB long range weapons system could change the war in Ukraine I DW News" video.

@ibrahimn22 you spelled russian wrong.
8
@she825 yeah, they moved their ammunition hubs farther back and divided them up more. Still doing damage but the months of ammunition depos going up is done. With this new range it could become a problem again.
7
@islamonlysolution461 20 HIMARS doesn't win a war
4
They have 31 m1 abrams Coming and Almost 200 promised to come. Seems a little more then window dressing.
3
@mizzo8341 ukraine would. The bridge was only finished in 2018.
3
@xcitemex6353 zelenskyy has a wife and kids....
3
@John Jackson depends. UK, Poland, Germany, Denmark, Norway, Estonia, Spain, and USA have all announced Ukranian soldiers training on their soil. Most aren't giving numbers. UK does almost 5k a batch while France recently trained 2k. Spain is currently training 225 soldiers. With 2400 planned to have graduated by end of 2023. Portugal is training an un known number with 24 combat medics. Other nations haven't been very clear on volume from what I can tell.
3
It's about time. This should make a difference. Now russia needs to modify their logistics again.
3
@Crashed131963 only 18 of them though. These are cheaper and more abundant
2
@Thetequilashooter1 that 75% reduction may have been true for a while but when the stock piles moved the shelling kicked back up. I think you slightly over estimate HIMARS. Luckily they are far from the only system sent to Ukraine. The new GLSDB systems coming should put on another good show for the russians and drive their logistics hubs even further back.
2
@Gorgeous Greg your scenario seems unlikely. However russia would be destroyed along with everyone if tactical nukes happen. Besides the army's of the EU alone have more manpower and equipment then russia.
2
They did in Afghanistan and Korea. That was the USSR. they are a shadow of their former self now. russia bit off more then they can chew. They can't use their nukes offensively unless they want a response in kind.
1
@PhoenixQuest1 MAD exists any first strike would be met with in kind. Luckily there's plenty of room in russia. If ukraine doesn't March on Moscow he has no rational reason to nuke.
1
@lesterquintrell4844 poutn is a fascist invador trying to genocide a people. He has filtration camps and mobile incinerators. This is very clearly good vs evil. It hasn't been this clear since ww2.
1
@breakfast00club..11 lol, 5 nations voted with russia in NATO. Even Morocco is sending tanks to Ukraine. Only countries with russia are pariah states and their puppets. This is just 1 of 14 wars of expression the russian federation has started on their borders.
1
Gladly 🤭
1
@cipheroth that does seem to be russias plan man.
1
They are actually delivering 14 by the end of March and 112 from the factory by the end of 2024.
1
@Benjamin-tg79 that would lead to St Peters burg and Moscow get a nice warm mushroom cloud.
1
@uzihuzar2235 obviously nobody is giving ukraine nukes. That's a silly idea.
1
And the nuclear submarines and first strike French response would completely obliterate russia in an exchange. It's called mutually assured destruction for a reason.
1
@PhoenixQuest1 they all have submarines on patrol with a minimum of 18 nuclear warheads and delivery systems. Even if all caught with their pants down their submarines would ensure russia ends in fire 🔥 it's called MAD (Mutually assured destruction). For a reason.
1
Get Bakmut yet? Or need another month? Meanwhile how's Kharkiv and Kherson doing for russians?
1
That's interesting because polling shows a lot of support for weapons to ukraine in Germany.
1
@markhamburger5587 I watched that conference live, didn't seem so bad to me. Besides Germany is the 3rd largest military supporter of Ukraine. They are doing quite a bit.
1
@marioformosa4259 you need to know which cave to bomb.
1
Glad you aren't in charge
1