Comments by "First Last" (@First-Last_name) on "What Germany's 'shilly-shallying' means for Ukraine, Russia u0026 NATO | DW News" video.

  1.  @AquilMandiqui  right, so we stop helping Ukraine and we will have "peace in our time"? Lol, get real buddy. You can't sit back and let russia pick European countries off 1 by 1. They already made it very clear Moldova is next. From there who knows. Direct NATO confrontation is even more likely if we sit on our hands and hope for the best.
    11
  2.  @lehelzelenka207  and where are the m1 abrams from America and Australia?
    4
  3. So where are American and French tanks?
    3
  4.  @mirandahotspring4019  Oplot-M is about same weight, guzzles fuel, and is high maintenance. Ukraine manages it just fine. They are also taking on challenger2. So really what excuse does America actually have for not sending any m1 abrams? Leclerc went into service 1992, its modern enough for this conflict. russia has been using a lot of t-64/62 lately.
    3
  5.  @superjohnnygamble6328  by that logic America and France should also withdraw from NATO.
    3
  6.  @3markaw  Ukraine operates the Oplot-M which is only 3 tons lighter then the M1 abrams, has similar high fuel consumption too. America has no good excuse not to send M1 abrams. The Challanger2 tanks being sent by the UK are even heavier then m1 abrams
    3
  7.  @mirandahotspring4019  The Honeywell AGT1500 is a gas turbine engine. It is the main powerplant of the M1 Abrams series. Its not rocket science it's a gas turbine. excuses, excuses 🙄 😒 seriously stop coming up with arguments that don't hold any water. Just because America likes to use jet fuel doesn't mean it needs to run on jet fuel.
    1
  8.  @mirandahotspring4019  again, any mechanic can work on a gas turbine. Not rocket science, not a special fairy. Acording to American politician Adam Smith, the only real reason America doesn't send is they made a deal with China. Least America could do is be honest and stop deflecting all criticism to Germany. It's embarrassing.
    1
  9.  @mirandahotspring4019  United States House Committee on Armed Services Adam Smith has already dismissed that reasoning as an excuse. That's why I don't buy it. It's not as hard as you think. Plenty of trains, planes, electric generators, and gas compressing turbines, are gas turbines. The Ukranians are also resourceful. They have the skills to learn just as fast as they would on a leopard The Oplot-M and challenger2s hog just as much fuel ⛽
    1
  10.  @mirandahotspring4019  well members of the House Committee on Armed Services would agree with sending M1 Abrams, and so would Ukraine.
    1
  11.  @bullerfnis1961  right, all those m1 abrams in Ukraine showing real leadership. If anyone is a leader it's UK, or Poland.
    1
  12. I've heard the real reason Biden won't send tanks or long range missles is because he made an agreement with China. In exchange China won't send any military equipment. So says American politician Adam Smith. I wonder if Germany has a similar deal.
    1
  13.  @BennyGeserit  neither should America if they are going to keep deflecting onto Germany. Don't see any m1 abrams in Ukraine either. Or The Leclerc.
    1
  14. I agree with American politician Adam Smith. America needs to send m1 abrams and there is no reasonable excuse not to do so.
    1
  15. I guess so is America and France.
    1
  16.  Mr Rapan Pass  they have nuclear subs patrolling around the ocean. Nuke the UK and about 16 of the largest russian cities won't exist, from just 1 submarine.
    1