Comments by "Andi Arbeit" (@Kartoffelsuppe_m_Wursteinlage) on "Heavy weaponry from Germany: What difference will it make on the ground? | DW News" video.

  1. Phased out, because there was no need for anti-air systems. Now german army realised that it was a failure. Mantis is not that mobile to defend e.g. tanks
    4
  2. Sounds like a happy marriage. I'm sorry for your husband, please do not involve the other 80 mio. people in your strange world.
    3
  3. @kukul roukul No need for this skill in the past 20 years. E.g. no need for anti-air systems in Afghanistan. No need for heavy tanks which are not global operable.
    3
  4. Europe needs no head, especially not a german one. As partners in EU and NATO it need common decisions. After this every nation will help according to their possibilities. Got it?
    2
  5. Freedom is worth to negotiate and to find compromises. A wise soldier who was in the trenches if world war 1 told. "After we fought and died four long years, they sat together and negotiate. This could have happen four years earlier."
    2
  6. Next complain: "They've send us complex weapons."
    2
  7. All former generals in Germany have wondered why they want to deliver the most complex tank weapon system.
    2
  8. San Francisco. seems to be a more conveniant distance. So you can defend the west by pooping into the armchair.
    1
  9. Yes. Peeing at hosts carpet and afterwards demanding free lunch.
    1
  10. The US delivered no tanks ar all so far. After those unjustified war crimes in Iraq, Vietnam, Afghanistan, Syria, heres your chance.
    1
  11. The quality of informations provided here by DW are in harsh contrast to some comments.
    1
  12. In two months? Russian gas is diwn to 35% by now. Let me guess: they should restart their nuclear olants and produce the gas by themselfes.
    1
  13. In two months? Russian gas is diwn to 35% by now. Let me guess: they should restart their nuclear olants and produce the gas by themselfes.
    1
  14. The very best fruends, in terms of money and who have to pay building up ukraine again.
    1
  15. Very best friends when it comes to terms of money. Russian will not build up their mess.
    1
  16. No tanks from the US so far, no tanks from france, no tanks from britain, no tanks from canada. Canada sent 6 "six" howitzers. Got it?
    1
  17. Ignorance is shamefull as well. Do you watch the news here or do you add simply your blabla here?
    1
  18. @Abalada No. It's direct funded by the states tax payers money. DW has even own law for this to keep them going
    1
  19. It depends to 50% on the sradf who use the weapon. Pretty complex to use. Next complain: "They've sent us too complex weapons."
    1
  20. Maybe the people in Yemen should have some as well, to defend themselves against Saudi agression?
    1
  21. My holy spaghetti monster told me, it sounds strange, when people claim to save lifes with weapons.
    1
  22. So try to bring your words back into your mouth.
    1
  23. Other experts here säy, they are useless.
    1
  24. Yes, american people use to think i n cathegories like leadership.
    1