Comments by "Ego Brain" (@egobrain7349) on "The "Totally Organic" Ban Porn Proposal: My Thoughts" video.

  1.  @hre2044  banning things IS authoritarian.
    11
  2.  @elric9572  drugs should be legalized. Banning it only creates more criminals in jail that we all have to pay for and more organized crime which gets people killed.
    8
  3. I see conservatives proposing it. 🤷‍♀️ It's a nonsense idea regardless of who wants it though. It sounds like some communist China authoritarianism. And banning things doesn't work. It just causes more crime, death, etc. As seen in prohibition and the "war on drugs"...which is just a war on people.
    8
  4.  Russian Bot #568984  stop trying to police everyone.
    6
  5.  @rationaljudgment  No. If you don't want to watch porn, don't watch it. If you don't want your kid to watch porn, parent them! Stop trying to parent and police everyone else. Freedom over all!
    6
  6.  @rationaljudgment  "teach a child to respect and be moral" Exactly. The parents. Glad you agree. "You play friend with your child, they will not respect or gain moral guidance from a teacher/enforcer" But you just said we NEED the government to step in cuz parents won't...now you say that the kids won't listen to the Gov if the parents haven't taught them. Mental gymnastics you have going in.
    6
  7.  @snaek2594  Parents should parent. Not the government.
    6
  8.  @TrueCarthaginian  same. As soon as he said ban porn (and I don't even watch porn), I said nope. I'm out.
    5
  9.  @yustwastaken  Itself not nuanced at all. Parents should parent and restrict. Not the government or corporations.
    4
  10.  Russian Bot #568984  If you want to tell people they shouldn't watch porn or tell em they're gross for it, go ahead. 🤷‍♀️ Nobody is stopping you. Anything above that is unacceptable. Let people live how they choose to live.
    4
  11.  @KattBon  the impacts are not impactual enough to result in the government needing to step in and have more control over the lives of people living how they choose to live. Literally everything can harm someone if you're looking at it how you are. Stop with the mental gymnastics and stay out of peoples lives. Definitely keep the government out.
    4
  12.  @KattBon  1) His "shaming" was calling me pathetic for a comment. Not "jerking to porn". Reading comprehension can take you a long way in life. 2) I can't "jerk it" as I'm a woman and I have nothing to jerk 3) I'm not much of a porn watcher. 4) I'm fine with you not taking me seriously. Unaffected.
    4
  13. Yea I was always a fan of his. Not now. Can't support someone advocating for more government interference into our lives and less freedom.
    4
  14.  @SspaceB  he's not wrong.
    3
  15. Same. The left has gone way too far and now the right is.
    3
  16.  @zanitzeuken  👏👏👏
    3
  17.  Russian Bot #568984  So we should ban porn because people will get sad and have hurt feelings? 😆😆
    3
  18.  FacePwn64  👏
    3
  19.  Russian Bot #568984  Sorry. Your "shaming" doesn't effect me..just like it wouldn't effect people who watch porn. Create your social movement. I said anything above it.. i.e banning and/restricting by government or corporations.
    3
  20. @AquaJetEmpoleon 👏👏
    3
  21.  @brofist1959  the people I've seen boosting it are religious conservatives 🤷‍♀️.
    3
  22.  @darkblood626  👏
    3
  23.  @rationaljudgment  You sound like an authoritarian tyrant. Like wow. 😵
    3
  24. 👏👏👏👏 Yes, Zedrick
    3
  25. Glad you seen the light. Freedom over all.
    3
  26. @AquaJetEmpoleon 👏
    3
  27.  @TheGreenKnight500  👏👏👏👏
    2
  28.  @derrickmiles5240  👎👎🙄
    2
  29.  @h-e-acc  👏
    2
  30.  @volk4523  you can't get rid of it without taking away freedom. 👎👎 China may take you. You'll love it there.
    2
  31.  @elric9572  It didn't work AT ALL! Where were you in history class? Watching porn?
    2
  32. @Trash Person 👏👏👏
    2
  33.  @TheGreenKnight500  well said
    2
  34. 👏👏👏👏 well said!! Less government, not more!! Less laws, not more!! Bannings only cause more crime, death, etc.
    2
  35. Agree. The hypocrisy is amazing.
    2
  36.  Russian Bot #568984  👎👎👎 Freedom over all
    2
  37.  @mikemcniel3086  No, it definitely isn't ok.
    2
  38.  @thedarklord530  your tight that freeom isnan illusion, but that doesn't mean you break the illusion and beg for authoritarian government to take more freedoms. William the younger - Necessity is the plea of every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants. It is the creed of slaves.
    2
  39.  @Flynn_82  Styx is defending individual rights and liberty, as he should. As any American should.
    2
  40.  JGCameron  I was all for them when they were going after Charlie Kirk and the hypocrisy and such in some of the mainstream conservatives. Cheering them on. Then they started this authoritarian "save the children" act and I'm out. 🙄👎 Freedom over all!
    2
  41.  @rationaljudgment  No, it's allowing people to choose their life without government sticking their noses in. That is not moronic. Again, it is freedom. Banning things doesn't even work. History proves this. The rest of your comment is just asinine as I and nobody else has advocated for "letting" kids watch porn.
    2
  42.    Now we're talking. That's the only way to save the children!
    2
  43.  @rationaljudgment  So if parents aren't capable of bringing up the kids under your ideas, we should just give up our kids to the state then, right? Why let parents make any decisions for them. Certainly they'll make the wrong choices. They can't be trusted.
    2
  44.  @seenkyle5591  by being free to do and watch what you want without daddy government banning you..
    2
  45. 👏👏👏👏
    2
  46.  @TheGreenKnight500  👏
    1
  47.  Russian Bot #568984  You're shaming and you want policing. Don't play word games.
    1
  48.  Russian Bot #568984  you realize porn is something generally done in tbe privacy of your own home and therefore can be done privately and unknown to others? If you're advocating for making it known, you're proving my point that you want policing. You make no sense.
    1
  49.  @Life_Is_Torture0000  👏👏👏
    1
  50.  @zanitzeuken  👏
    1
  51. Agree J SUTTON. Banning things doesn't work and it's authoritarian. It sounds like some communist nonsense.
    1
  52.  @yuka-youtube  Agree completely.
    1
  53.  @hre2044  No. That's not a ban. That's an age restriction. Completely different 🤦‍♀️
    1
  54.  @cajunboi4888  We WILL be a minority in 30 years. That's a literal fact if the trends now continue.
    1
  55. 👏👏
    1
  56.  @TranslatedAssumption  that's asinine.
    1
  57. 👏👏 very well said!
    1
  58.    👏👏👏👏👏👏👏
    1
  59.  @thedarklord530  No, I'm well awarenthat we aren't free. We are as free as they let us think we are. I also don't want to be even less free. That is what you are advocating.
    1
  60.  @thedarklord530  I'll stick with the freedom we have and fight for more. Never less. Freedom over everything. All laws happen by the threat that men with guns will come to you and harm you in some way if you don't comply with their law. You will be fined, caged, or murdered. "Surrender your liberty to me and I'll keep you safe" -every tyrant ever "Those who give up essential liberties for a little temporary security, deserve neither and will lose both"
    1
  61.  @rationaljudgment  That's their prerogative to be shit parents. You also cannot give more control to a government without them taking more and more and more and more. I'll pass. Freedom over all. Anyone advocating for more government control is bat shit crazy.
    1
  62.  @rationaljudgment ....your name seems ironic.
    1
  63.  Mazxj Stripes  Yes, he truly is.
    1
  64.  @rationaljudgment  Yes, your name being "rational" whilst being completely irrational is ironic. Freedom is completely rational. Especially when one knows history. Stop trying to be everyone's daddy. It's embarassing for you.
    1
  65.  @rationaljudgment  Ego Brain is a song. 🤣 You continually make your name ironic. If you think I'm rational, that's fine, I'm not the one claiming to be so. I never said I let my kid do whatever. That is an argument nobody made. Nice straw man. If I pluck a blade of straw, he'll fall down. The argument is that parents restrict their childrens content. We can have law and enforcement without it being communistic and authoritarian. I've never explained my idea of freedom so why are you presuming so? Knowing that I think banning and/or restricting one subject is hardly knowing my views. You get more irrational as you go.
    1
  66.  @rationaljudgment  The parents teach the parameters and the kids follow or they don't. Seeing porn isn't going to kill them. We teach our kids all sorts of things. they'll listen or they won't. Parental settings come equipped on just about every device there is these days. Use them. No more control. no more governmental bodied to implement the control and costs of taxpayers to pay for it. Next.
    1
  67. *irrational
    1
  68.  @rationaljudgment  How is it backtracking to make the fact that you are saying things nobody said? I think you're out of your league here.
    1
  69.  @rationaljudgment  So the parents should put up the parental controls that are equipped in most devices today. You are acting as if a kid seeing porn is the equivalent of them being kidnapped and raped. Again...that irrational thing. Yes, you can broadcast porn on tv. Ever watch HBO? Porn channels? Etc? Your last paragraph is beyond irrational and asinine and proof that you're beyond a reasonable discussion.
    1
  70.  @rationaljudgment  what exactly do you propose be done. Exactly.
    1
  71.  @rationaljudgment  Please point out any and all dismantling.
    1
  72.  @rationaljudgment  So what do you propose? What should the government do to save us from the evils of the porn man? Should we ship off all the kids? Should I pack my kids stuff?
    1
  73.  @rationaljudgment  Um yeah. It is obvious that we should keep it to adults. Literally nobody is saying we should just let kids watch it. Not one person! How do you keep it to adults beyond the things we already have?
    1
  74.  @rationaljudgment  So how does the government know that a child was able to access porn?
    1
  75.  @rationaljudgment  in your utopian scenario, I mean.
    1
  76.  @rationaljudgment  Tell me how the government will know that a child was able to access porn so they can give out the punishment to whoever gets the punishment.
    1
  77.  @rationaljudgment  the ID access- there would end up being a database of who is accessing porn. Databases is a big fat no. *sounds the alarm* 👎👎 Mandatory parental locks-this is much less invasive but kids can get around locks and still access or use someone who doesn't have kids and whatnot. There's nothing you can do to stop someone from looking at porn if they really want to. Just like kids get alcohol, cigarettes, drugs, etc. There's tons of ways to get around it and the only way for the government to know is to have databases on citizens. Too much privacy invasion. Literal nanny state. There's nothing we can do that isn't invasive af except be good parents and parent. Not all will. Doesn't mean tbe rest of us should lose more freedoms for their shit parenting. People can have discussions and news can talk about it to get ppl more into it. That's it. What you want is invasive.
    1
  78.  @rationaljudgment  I care. Many people care. It is invasive. Databases and registries are used against you in political matters and whatnot. It's not the government business if Bob wanted to watch someone getting titty fucked. That is invasion of privacy. No 👎
    1
  79.  Mazxj Stripes  👏👏
    1
  80.  @rationaljudgment  No parent is "allowing" it. A kid doing what kids do and getting around shit isn't "allowing". Who is saying they're their kids friend so their kids can do what they want? Nobody! We had this conversation earlier, remember? Do you only believe in extremes?
    1
  81. 👏
    1
  82. Agreed
    1
  83.  Russian Bot #568984  Move to China. You'd be happy there.
    1
  84.  Russian Bot #568984  They ban porn. Sounds like something you'd like.
    1