Comments by "Ego Brain" (@egobrain7349) on "The Jimmy Dore Show" channel.

  1. ​ @David-f8e2v  Says the propaganda with 0 reasoning or proof for this belief.
    1
  2. ​ @calasangel  Stating facts is shilling?
    1
  3. ​ @theghostofmaximumvolume3414 😂
    1
  4. @Jeffrey Menard that's a good start.
    1
  5.  @a9029k  truth. Lol
    1
  6. Not now. They successfully smeared him to be dropped from ag.
    1
  7. 👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻 They declared independence from U over a decade ago because of that. They WANT to be part of R.
    1
  8. ​ @julia.mcconnell  Exactly
    1
  9. ​ @michaelgrishko8028  no, the east U protested and were atked by the west U (and their actual knot seas) They were aided by R.
    1
  10. ​ @HK-zf7op  It is absolutely true. U was supposed to leave the region according the the MA and they didnt. This area actually declared independence from U due to them atking them. And they'd been doing it for a decade when R recognized their indepdnce.
    1
  11. ​ @georgenelson7891  The media calls those of the area R separatists. They do it for a reason. It is true because they're ethnically R. But they say R when they dont need to. They do it because it makes it sound like it is R there doing the fgting and such.
    1
  12.  @TruthIsFreedom7777  Because contrary to Jimmy's comment, gov does not work.
    1
  13. ​ @marlysthoreen4363 He is right.
    1
  14. ​ @SouthEastSD619  No, the gov is not the answer. Almost never. The gov does not produce. It takes. Allow ppl to keep their money and we'd all be better off.
    1
  15. @SouthEastSD619  And I said they're not rights and I explained why they're not. You're not proving why it does not work. (One reason) Thanks.
    1
  16. 👏🏻👏🏻
    1
  17.  @JAKEWJONES  Facts.
    1
  18. ​ @jaelancaster5506 He is. a climate zealot and anti-2a.
    1
  19.  @malvane8061  👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
    1
  20. ​ @HK-zf7op  Both areas that declared independence from U and want to be part of R.
    1
  21. The ppl in Flint do have drinkable water...
    1
  22.  @baronvonlimbourgh1716  The government being farrr too big and impeding on the citizens and the free market isnt what caused this. We dont even have true capitalism because of the government interference. We have corporatism or crony capitalism. Not what it is supposed to be. Blaming this on capitalism is just asinine.
    1
  23.  @octaviogomora7884  The government would sill be there to take half your labor and give it to those who refuse to work or make bad decisions...
    1
  24.  @michaelhunziker7287  👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏
    1
  25.  @stevesmith7839  Same things that can happen with government employees. Lol I have no problem with keeping it, personally. But stop pretending that the gov works in business. It doesn't. Stop raising our prices to mail and give them funds that were given to other countries.
    1
  26.  @peetky8645  well said
    1
  27.  @ramroopneil7962  Did those ppl ask for money?
    1
  28.  @ramroopneil7962  I don't understand that comment. You are talking about people at the Capitol and saying they are asking for money, yea? I've not seen this at all but asked just in case. Your reasoning is that Jimmy, who is a progressive and not even on the same playing field as them, is maybe advocating for it...so that is your proof of them "asking for money"? And all of this is based off of a Operation Mockingbird medias article, not those ppl themselves?....🤔
    1
  29.  @nomdeguerre8464  Js bought the land they turned into Is. They even overpaid for it. By time Is was created, they owned more than As did. (The majority was unowned, crown lands) So, As weren't "displaced." Their lands were bought from them.
    1
  30.  @nomdeguerre8464  ...No, it is fact.
    1
  31.  @nomdeguerre8464  Nope. It is facts. The gaslighting is all the propaganda being spread by Progressives.
    1
  32.  @nomdeguerre8464  Then explain to me the "truth." When did Js start going in? How did they obtain the land?
    1
  33.  @nomdeguerre8464  Typical. You have no clue what you're even saying and supporting.
    1
  34.  @nomdeguerre8464  Ok, I only seen the 1st comment. You realize that Js had already been there for 70 years by then? And as soon as Is was created, they were attacked by 8 A countries? That was the real Jens side. You're talking about the response. There is 100 yrs of Is being attacked by As.
    1
  35.  @nomdeguerre8464  And you never answered the questions of when Js started going in and how they obtained the land. And mind you, they won more during the attacks, yet kept giving it back to the As over the years.
    1
  36.  @nomdeguerre8464  What do you mean what happened to they laid for it? That is still the answer. They did pay for it. This is clearly too much for your wikipedia level knowledge. No, they weren't. Again, they attacked the Js. The Js just won.
    1
  37.  @nomdeguerre8464  Irrelevant. Incorrect. I literally just told you that I had only seen the 1 comment before. Don't be disingenuous. You didn't even know they paid for the land (and still don't know haha) and had been there since the 1880s.
    1
  38.  @nomdeguerre8464  AGAIN, no it wasn't. I seen a comment that said Na+. How am I supposed to know what that meant? Lmfao Disingenuous af. And I already explained to you why you're wrong about that event. It was a war begun by 8 different nations around Is whose intent was to rid of Js completely. The Js just won. And a lot of the As there didn't flee from Is. They fled because they were told to by those other A nation's. They were warned. Again, a wikipedia education.
    1
  39.  @nomdeguerre8464  You can look up that bit was paid for. This isn't some new or hidden information, Jethro. Nothing you've said makes it undeniable. It is a fact. They started purchasing in the 1880s. By time Is was made, they owned more than the As. (Over 70% being unoccupied and unowned Crown lands) You have no clue except what the tv tells you.
    1
  40.  @nomdeguerre8464  And again, incorrect. All you had posted that I seen first was Na+. How was I to know what you meant? And then when I seen it, I explained how you're not correct. I explained that they didn't start that altercation. 8 nations around them did. It was THEIR intention to do the jen siding. They just won.
    1
  41.  @nomdeguerre8464  You seem to have an extreme reading comprehension issue. 😄😄Have a good one. Continue to be wrong. Maybe at some point you will actually just look jt up. Novel idea! Lmao
    1
  42. ​ @RJ1234-d1s  You really think that we wouldn't protect that?
    1
  43.  @MarkCisOfTheLoonieLeft  "all your side seems ro have is ad hominem attacks..." As you slew nothing but ad hominem attacks.
    1
  44.  @briangriffin8106  A disgruntled employee cashing in like everyone else and interviews of the Trump hotel thing show that there were blacks, Puerto Rican, and Asian ppl living in the hotel and the claim qaa from yet again, an ex disgruntled employee.
    1
  45.  @briangriffin8106  Yes many things. Your question is not an argument.
    1
  46.  @briangriffin8106  You aren't wrong there. He isn't my "hero" tho. His insistence on the CP5 is racism how? Actually, he condemned them over and over again. The media clipped his comments. When he said "there were fine ppl on both sides ", go fine the whole speech. He specifically said he isn't talking about the neo nazis and that they need condemned totally. He has aince condemned white supremacists and such like 20 times.
    1
  47.  @briangriffin8106  I did address those. I noted that tenants and enployees during the investigation pointed out thT black ppl and other ppl like Puerto Rican and Asian lived in the apartments...negating the claim that they didn't allow black ppl. The claim was toward Fred Trump anyway. The ex employee who said it specifically said Fred Trump said to not allow black ppl. Other employees said there was no such policy. (And the black ppl that literally lived there...) The Trumps were never proven guilty and never admitted guilt. They didn't have a fine. They entered into a consent decree. The decree makes clear the Trumps did not view the agreement as a surrender, saying the settlement was “in no way an admission” of a violation.The Trumps admitted no wrongdoing and were prohibited from “discriminating against any person in the terms, conditions, or privileges of sale or rental of a dwelling.” They were also required to take out advertisements notifying minority individuals that they had an equal opportunity to seek housing at Trump properties.
    1
  48.  @briangriffin8106  Yes, I absolutely dismissed the claims of one ex disgruntled employee who is cashing in.
    1
  49.  @briangriffin8106  I also just noticed your poat where you imply Fred Trump was a kkk member. sigh There is zero evidence that he was a member or a supporter. There was a big fight that broke out at a rally a long time ago and Fred Trump was detained then discharged with no files charged. There is zero evidence that he was a part of the kkk or a supporter of them.
    1
  50. The funniest part is how many ppl believe Flip Flop Fauci!
    1