Comments by "Ego Brain" (@egobrain7349) on "The Rubin Report" channel.

@Hells Only 🤦🏻‍♀️
1
@Hells Only I've said all that needs said above.
1
@Hells Only Cool story
1
@MrJimmytheweed My comment clearly says what I said.
1
@Karben22 👏
1
@RageWorthyFilms I go anywhere.
1
@MrJimmytheweed No, you tried to replace my words. My comment was quite clear. Your response was asinine and was just trying to say I said things I wasn't saying. Everything I said was true. Lol
1
@MrJimmytheweed No you asked questions to imply I was saying things that I was not.
1
@MrJimmytheweed Specifically point out what I said that was wrong.
1
@MrJimmytheweed Because the US is a republic. Lol It is a constitutional republic. We elect representatives and they are restrained to the Constitution. There is a fine line difference between the two. The founding fathers decided upon a republic do the minority cannot be ruled by the majority.
1
@MrJimmytheweed It is still based on todays definitions. Google is at your fingertips to discover the difference.
1
@MrJimmytheweed Yawnnn
1
@MrJimmytheweed Still yawning. Being derogatory is childish. Not my fault you don't understand the difference. 😘
1
@KC PMII 👏👏👏
1
@59232 Exactly. That was ridiculous.
1
@kimmer6 👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
1
@irenejennings2856 Exactly
1
@ruru6881 Exactly
1
@solutionseeker5875 well said
1
@TCLe False. A study on seroprevalence studies show that the global IFR is 0.15% and in the US, specifically, 0.2%. People, unvaxxed or otherwise are very very very unlikely to pass from it. Who was considered a cov death was admitted to be you are a cov death if you tested positive for it, even if you dies of a "clear, alternate cause." You were also considered it if you had tested positive up to 60 days before, in some places. Later dropped to a few weeks. Some were never even tested and were just assumed. Then there is a problem with the pcr test which was used up until Dec when they finally admitted what everyone had been saying the entire year which is that the test is not supposed to be used for diagnosis (says the inventor himself) as it cannot differentiate between cov and the flu. They also admitted that there was no consensus on the mumber of cycles they were using and they were doing up yo 40 which was WAY too high and gave false positive as it can pick up old genetic material.
1
@TCLe I would also like to note the windfall the hospitals got for every cov patient. Every ventilator used. Etc. Most of the ppl with cov, in the hospitals right now, are mild cases and/or are there for completely separate reasons and just tested positive because they test everyone so they can get that cash.
1
@zakthompson2101 It only helps the person who gets it (cov actually has an extremely low IFR without the vax so..) They still get cov and carry the same viral load making them just as contagious so they are just as "dangerous." So the entire line of thinking of saving the vaxxed from unvaxxed is erroneous.
1
Truly
1