Comments by "Ego Brain" (@egobrain7349) on "Kaitlin Bennett Crashes International Women's Day March" video.

@brexzo3222 No it is an actual biological fact tbat life begins at conception. And most people DO get abortions just because they feel like it
4
@peopleperson8819 "nope" Yep! It is alive. It is human. Another human is killing it on purpose. That is a human life being murdered. 🤷🏻‍♀️
3
@jazmineforoughi2013 I don't see this Ellie person so I guess she did educate herself and then deleted. Hahaha
2
@peopleperson8819 It is a human life. It's murder. 🤷🏻‍♀️
2
@brexzo3222 A chance at death is not actively killing. Bad argument. You're right, a mother doesn't violently stab her womb. She allows a doctor to violently stab her womb. The fetus(which means unborn baby. Word games don't change that) is alive. At the moment of conception it has its own complete genetic code and is it's own living being in its first stage of growth.
2
@elisabellavia9655 bacteria is not human. Bad argument.
2
@tierramoore8530 👏🏻👏🏻
2
@zazelliasunset4793 well said
2
We should go with when life begins. Which is at conception.
1
@92bagder exactly 👌🏻
1
@codyschnuriger6743 👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
1
@brexzo3222 All abortion is violent. Watch an abortion video.
1
@elisabellavia9655 It isn't ever just cells. It is a stage of life of humans that are growing.
1
@brexzo3222 Considine, Douglas (ed.). Van Nostrand's Scientific Encyclopedia. 5th edition. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, 1976, p. 943 Carlson, Bruce M. Patten's Foundations of Embryology. 6th edition. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1996, p. 3] O'Rahilly, Ronan and M�ller, Fabiola. Human Embryology & Teratology. 2nd edition. New York: Wiley-Liss, 1996, pp. 8, 29. This textbook lists "pre-embryo" among "discarded and replaced terms" in modern embryology, describing it as "ill-defined and inaccurate" (p. 12}] England, Marjorie A. Life Before Birth. 2nd ed. England: Mosby-Wolfe, 1996, p.31 Moore, Keith L. Essentials of Human Embryology. Toronto: B.C. Decker Inc, 1988, p.2 Cloning Human Beings. Report and Recommendations of the National Bioethics Advisory Commission. Rockville, MD: GPO, 1997, Appendix-2 Dox, Ida G. et al. The Harper Collins Illustrated Medical Dictionary. New York: Harper Perennial, 1993, p. 146 [Dr. John Eppig, Senior Staff Scientist, Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, Maine) and Member of the NIH Human Embryo Research Panel -- Panel Transcript, February 2, 1994, p. 31
1
@brexzo3222 Science is not in a debate. Most biologists confirm when life begins. There's been hearings in congress by hundreds of scientists even. Ppl have dome polls on biologists. Its not up for debate. It is quite clear.
1
@elisabellavia9655 read post above with all the studies.
1
@brexzo3222 I just gave you a huge list of studies. Considine, Douglas (ed.). Van Nostrand's Scientific Encyclopedia. 5th edition. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, 1976, p. 943 Carlson, Bruce M. Patten's Foundations of Embryology. 6th edition. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1996, p. 3] O'Rahilly, Ronan and M�ller, Fabiola. Human Embryology & Teratology. 2nd edition. New York: Wiley-Liss, 1996, pp. 8, 29. This textbook lists "pre-embryo" among "discarded and replaced terms" in modern embryology, describing it as "ill-defined and inaccurate" (p. 12}] England, Marjorie A. Life Before Birth. 2nd ed. England: Mosby-Wolfe, 1996, p.31 Moore, Keith L. Essentials of Human Embryology. Toronto: B.C. Decker Inc, 1988, p.2 Cloning Human Beings. Report and Recommendations of the National Bioethics Advisory Commission. Rockville, MD: GPO, 1997, Appendix-2 Dox, Ida G. et al. The Harper Collins Illustrated Medical Dictionary. New York: Harper Perennial, 1993, p. 146 [Dr. John Eppig, Senior Staff Scientist, Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, Maine) and Member of the NIH Human Embryo Research Panel -- Panel Transcript, February 2, 1994, p. 31
1
@peopleperson8819 It is a human life. 🤣 What do uou think it's a fish? It is a stage of human life.
1
@peopleperson8819 No. I'm pro human life. Big difference. And I'm pro defense of your own life, even if it is in danger because of the baby, but that is unlikely since the time for it to endanger you is in later stages in which uou can just have the baby instead of killing it since babies live earlier and earlier these days. And that is extremely rare anyway. Regardless. Pro human life.
1
@brexzo3222 Talk to most biologists. Life LITERALLY begins at conception. Idc what situation a person has been in. No situation needs to end with killing a baby. Also, call it what you want, but those terms for baby mean the same thing. A baby in earlier stages of life. They're used as a way to undermine the babies life.
1
@brexzo3222 Yet most abortions are done for exactly those reasons. Lol They don't want a baby to interfere with their life. These are not acceptable and yet all these ppl are fighting for the ability to do just that. Kill a baby "just because".
1
@brexzo3222 Life doesn't mean that it has to "think for itself". Otherwise plants wouldn't be alive. This is a life tbat is human. Zygote, fetus, etc. Are unborn babies. Calling them other than what they are in an abortion febate is a tactic solely for dehumanizing the human life.
1
@brexzo3222 It is "just because" the baby will change their life and people are taught to be irresponsible and people like yourselves are buffaloed into thinking that it isn't even a human life. Those are copout excuses. There is always adoption.
1
@brexzo3222 The same can be said for a person who is only thinking of herself and not the human she created and kills. I'm thinking for more than myself. She is thinking only of herself. I said not being able to "think" doesn't make it not a life, not alive, not a person, or not murder whem it is intentionally killed.
1